This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
I’m getting ready to teach my Fall 2021 Patent Lawclass, and that means doing an updated patent grant graph. utility patents granted per year from 1840-2020: Data for 2021 isn’t included in the table, but as of July 31, 2021, the authority file contains 195,480 patents. This graph uses calendar years (Jan.
By Jason Rantanen I’m getting ready to teach my Fall 2023 Patent Lawclass, and that means updating the granted utility patents graph that I do every few years. Filings are continuing to trend slightly upwards (there were 457k non-RCE UPR filings in FY 2022, as compared with 450k in FY 2020 and 427k in FY 2018).
Today I am introducing Legal Tech Look-Back , a recurring series of posts that will turn back the calendar on legal tech news. As reported here in September 2020 , following the introduction of Lexis+, LexisNexis retired “Advance” from the name of the older product, instead calling it simply Lexis. Aah legal tech.
But not much has been normal since the COVID pandemic hit, which caused the court to begin remote arguments in April 2020. There haven’t been oral arguments outside of San Francisco since the February 2020calendar in Sacramento. “The court is working calendar to calendar,” he said. ’ ”
As awful as was the year 2020 for so many reasons, my year-end report last year found reasons to be optimistic. The silver lining of 2020,” I wrote, “is that we have been forced to consider changes that were long overdue and then given the opportunity to implement those changes.”. It is as if we are serving time in a legal tech limbo.
And we are in the midst right now of spending a three-part miniseries within the podcast of really looking in terms of what’s going on in the lawschools. We know that they are training the next generation in our profession and we know that these issues are becoming much more acutely aware in the environment. BREE: Right.
Today I am introducing Legal Tech Look-Back , a recurring series of posts that will turn back the calendar on legal tech news. As reported here in September 2020 , following the introduction of Lexis+, LexisNexis retired “Advance” from the name of the older product, instead calling it simply Lexis. Aah legal tech.
Launching January 2022, our AI-driven engine will automate litigation processes like lawsuit and motion drafting, discovery preparation, procedural calendaring and much more by turning days of work into 2-3 minute-long activities. Traction: We have 30+ solo and small law firm subscriptions since coming out of a soft launch in December 2020.
And obviously starting with having been in lawschool, I’ve been a part of the legal community. And frankly, by virtue of being African-American, I’ve seen what difference it makes in various places, whether it’s having people in lawschool assume that I got in as part of an affirmative action outreach.
As awful as was the year 2020 for so many reasons, my year-end report last year found reasons to be optimistic. The silver lining of 2020,” I wrote, “is that we have been forced to consider changes that were long overdue and then given the opportunity to implement those changes.”. It is as if we are serving time in a legal tech limbo.
Even before the events of 2020, I think, we started to see firms dedicate more resources to DE&I, like creating full time positions, moving away from DE&I being embedded in HR or being seen as a compliance requirement from the GCs office. So we had really started to see kind of an elevation of DE&I and the role. BREE: Right.
Launching January 2022, our AI-driven engine will automate litigation processes like lawsuit and motion drafting, discovery preparation, procedural calendaring and much more by turning days of work into 2-3 minute-long activities. Traction: We have 30+ solo and small law firm subscriptions since coming out of a soft launch in December 2020.
Demo video: [link] Founded: 10/28/2020, Vancouver, BC, Canada Target customer: Solos, small and medium size firms. Founded: 8/1/2020, Ghent, Belgium (HQ). He has worked across startups and corporate technology, and is closing out his third year of lawschool. Target customer: Small to medium size litigation law firms.
We are wrapping up a three-part series looking at the interconnection of well-being in lawschools. We have had Linda Sugin from Fordham LawSchool, we have had Jennifer Leonard from Penn Law, and today we are so excited to welcome Janet Stearns from the Miami School of Law. How are you doing today?
The Supreme Court hasn’t been holding many oral arguments this term: only 23 cases have been heard or scheduled through the court’s recently announced March calendar , which will be its seventh of 2024–2025. Horvitz & Levy is co-counsel for amicus UC Irvine lawschools Consumer Law Clinic.)
The emergency calendar is busy almost on a weekly basis.” She has been a highly effective justice, stepping into the vacuum created by the death in 2020 of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. But I have to get up the next morning and keep on fighting.” Not anymore. Don’t risk your legacy.”
I actually never intended to go to lawschool. But then I go to lawschool. And then I thought for sure by summer 2020 we’d be able to go out and about and things would be quasi under control. For example, I never intended to be a diversity and inclusion professional. When I came to the U.S., I graduate.
Because I joined Morgan first as a summer associate after my second year of lawschool at Cornell LawSchool. Because the things I talked about earlier, things such as putting my 12 step meetings in my work calendar so that my assistant and everyone else knew when I was not available. STEVE: Chris, great questions.
(Horvitz & Levy is co-counsel for amicus UC Irvine lawschool’s Consumer Law Clinic.) The latest docket entries, in October 2023, show a defense motion — and the People’s response to the motion — to stay the appeal and for a limited remand or, in the alternative, for calendar preference.
a professor of law at Yale LawSchool, and author of the Pulitzer Prize-winning book, Locking Up Our Own: Crime and Punishment in Black America. A 2020 Gallup poll found that 81 percent of Black Americans, and 83 percent of Hispanic Americans, want police to spend the same amount of or more time in their area.
Below is my column in The Messenger on the early struggle of Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis to preserve her strategy of holding a mass 19-person trial over the 2020 election case involving former president Donald Trump. Of course, Willis is not the only person with a challenging calendar.
She told lawyers that she will stick with her schedule unless “I’m in trial in another matter that has not yet returned to my calendar.” As the calendar continues to shrink, claims of blind justice increasingly look like the blind pursuit of a specific person. Most citizens already see that reality. Jonathan Turley is the J.B. &
that Trump could “present a serious and substantial danger of prejudicing” his 2020 federal election interference case. Smith compared Trump’s comments on the trial to the “disinformation” spread by Trump after the 2020 election — the subject of the indictment. Smith told District Judge Tanya Chutkan in Washington, D.C.,
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content