2020 Civil Law Tort 
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
FEBRUARY 27, 2025
First Climate Case Brought by Youth in Japan On August 6, 2024, 16 Japanese young people filed a civil law case– Youth Climate Case Japan for Tomorrow –against 10 major thermal power companies claiming a violation of Articles 709 and 719 of the Civil Code (Tort). Royal Dutch Shell plc. ,
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
JUNE 1, 2022
Civil law cases. Civil lawsuits were filed in Sendai in 2017 and Kobe in 2018 by citizens against corporations that planned to build new coal-fired power plants. a group of citizens submitted a civil law complaint requesting an injunction to stop the construction and subsequent operation of two coal-fired power plants.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Conflict of Laws
DECEMBER 12, 2020
By Zhengxin Huo, Professor of Law, China University of Polit’l Science and Law; Associate Member of International Academy of Comparative Law; Observer of the UNESCO 1970 Convention. The Court, thereafter, held the hearings on 26 July and 12 October of 2018 respectively, and publicly pronounced the judgement on 4 December 2020.
Conflict of Laws
AUGUST 23, 2023
The monograph predominantly examines 19 Indonesian court decisions on choice of law in international commercial contracts during the period, 2000-2020. Finally, this second chapter discusses the limits on choice of law, such as public policy and mandatory rules.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
MAY 30, 2024
This holds for tort law (liability), criminal law, and administrative law. This is an important point, as the Draft Treaty leaves it up to the State Parties to determine whether the human rights violations are best dealt with in administrative, criminal, or civil law (Art. 2(e), 6, 7, and 8, in particular).
Conflict of Laws
JANUARY 30, 2024
The decision is the first to recognize a corporate duty to mitigate climate change under tort law. Examining two Supreme Court decisions from 2017 and 2020, the analysis covers grounds for revocation, the child’s refusal to return, and discrepancies with EU and Anglo-American Law decisions.
Conflict of Laws
JULY 9, 2021
12] Before and after the application, the defendant Sharp had brought tort claims arising from SEP (standard essential patent) licensing against OPPO by commencing several parallel proceedings before German courts, a Japanese court and a Taiwanese court. [13] See (2020) Yue 03 Min Chu No.689-1. See (2017) E 72 Xing Bao No.3.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
103 
Let's personalize your content