This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
A Delaware Superior Court Judge Tuesday ruled Fox Corp. of election fraud related to the 2020 US presidential election. Dominion alleged that Fox News adopted an election fraud narrative, centered on Dominion, to increase its viewers after the 2020 election. ” The post Delaware courtrules Fox Corp.
.” The complaint goes on to argue that “it is possible to draw 16 reasonably compact majority-Black districts,” which would better reflect the number of Black Arkansans in the state population, according to data from the 2020 US Census.
The US Supreme Courtruled in a 6-3 opinion Thursday that mistakes of law—and not only mistakes of fact—could protect parties from losing their copyrights on grounds of inaccurate registration. Unicolors, a fabric design company, sued fashion giant Hennes & Mauritz (H&M) for copyright infringement in 2020.
A New York appeals courtruled that a New York City law granting non-citizens the power to vote was unconstitutional. It was estimated that the law would allow more than 800,000 non-citizens the ability to vote in New York City local elections, prior to the court’s Wednesday ruling. The municipal legislation, Int.
Guaidó appointed the Guaidó Board as an ad hoc board of the Central Bank under a “transition statute” passed by the Venezuelan National Assembly. The Venezuelan Supreme Tribunal of Justice has held the transition statute null and void. The Maduro Board sued the Bank of England in May 2020 to release the gold reserves.
The US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit reversed and remanded a lower courtruling on Tuesday which allowed the organizations VoteAmerica and the Voter Participation Center (VPC) to send out mail-in ballot applications to Kansas voters with pre-filled information. Kansas later enacted HB2332 in 2021.
Share Alaska Native corporations are eligible for about $500 million in COVID-19 relief money that Congress earmarked for Native American tribes, the Supreme Courtruled Friday. The case required the court to decide whether Alaska Native corporations are “Indian tribes” for the purpose of the 2020 CARES Act.
But six years after his deportation, the Supreme Courtruled in Leocal v. Ashcroft that, under the relevant federal statute, DUI convictions like Palomar-Santiago’s are not aggravated felonies. The direct implications of the court’sruling are likely quite narrow.
The parties’ dispute is about whether a prosecutor or trial court can opt to void a plea deal that included a probationary term that is now longer than permitted. Stamps (2020) 9 Cal.5th Stamps (2020) 9 Cal.5th It’s not an easily resolved issue, because the Legislature didn’t specify an answer. In People v.
The decision represents the first 5-to-4 split in a case argued during the Court’s2020-21 term. In support, justice Sotomayor emphasized that the statute in Your Home did not implicate the presumption in favor of judicial review and was narrower than §231g, which simply incorporates §355(f ) into the RRA. Legal Background.
Where plaintiffs alleged that “church entities were negligent regarding the sexual abuse of minors” by a clergyman, and the allegations included claims of fraudulent concealment through an investigation that was actually a “whitewash,” dismissal based on the statute of limitations was reversed. Continue reading.
Alternatively, if the Patent Act requires inventor(s) must be human, are AI-created inventions not patentable at all under the current statute? In 2020, the USPTO refused to vacate the Notice of Missing Parts, pointing to the Patent Act’s text as support that the inventor must be a natural person. Thaler, assignee, filed U.S.
Do not forget your state or national bar journal, especially to help you keep up with the lastest changes to statutes and case law, as well as courtrule changes! You can also find great information at your local or state paralegal organization and its newsletter. As always, if I can give you a hand, please give a shout!
Kyle Rittenhouse, the 17-year-old who shot and killed two people during a 2020 protest in Kenosha, WI., Howrey Professor of Law at the George Washington University Law School, state statutes vary widely on defining what constitutes aggression. Photo by janinsanfran via Flickr Photo by PROjaninsanfran via Flickr.
A 2020 study by the NRE of over 2,400 confirmed exonerations found that in 30 percent of the cases prosecutorial misconduct was specifically a factor. Of the 106 exonerations through the end of 2020 in Pennsylvania, prosecutors committed misconduct in 48 of them, or about 45 percent. Certify Compliance.
Plaintiff asserted various claims against defendants, including breach of contract, fraud, intentional misrepresentation, and negligence, all of which the trial court dismissed as untimely pursuant to the three-year statute of limitations applicable to claims of injuries to real property. In Simpkins v. John Maher Builders, Inc. ,
In July 2019, Georgia Southern University (“GSU”) invited Martin to speak at the 2020 International Critical Media Literary Conference. 50-5-85’s inclusion of “other actions that are intended to limit commercial relations with Israel” makes the statute impermissibly vague. O.C.G.A. §
The libel defendants filed motions to dismiss pursuant to the TPPA, which the trial court granted on December 10, 2020. The trial court then entered an order awarding some attorneys’ fees on March 5, 2021, then due to some late filing, entered another order regarding attorneys’ fees on June 24, 2021. quoting Nandigam ).
In June 2020, the Supreme Court issued a summary reversal – meaning it decided the case without merits briefing or oral argument – in Andrus v. On remand, the Texas courtruled that the inadequate counsel had not prejudiced Andrus. Ineffective assistance of counsel. Washington. Filing a new petition in a second Andrus v.
Working on the presumption that the “ Legislature intends for ameliorative enactments to apply as broadly as is constitutionally permis sible,” the Supreme Court i n People v. The courtruled similarly last year in People v. McKenzie (2020) 9 Cal.5th
The statute provides a two-step IPR process: Step 1 is the institution decision by the Director under § 314(b); Step 2 is the trial and final written decision by the PTAB. At least two prerequisites assist the Director in deciding to grant review: [1] a reasonable likelihood that the petitioner would prevail in 35 U.S.C. § 315(b). . §
The Tennessee Supreme Court reviews very few cases in a given year. In the year ending June 30, 2020 (the last period for which information is publicly available) the High Court was asked to accept review in 569 cases. Because the trial court properly interpreted the statute, we affirm the trial court’s decision.
Last year, only 47% of respondents reported their laptop being their primary device, compared to 49% of respondents in 2020 responding that a desktop computer was their primary device. In 2020, 41% of solo law firms reported laptops being their primary device as opposed to 35% in 2021. This increase is not an outlier.
After an unsuccessful negotiation, the Committee of Yunchun Village and the Committee Dongpu Village sued Van Overeem to demand the statue’s return both in Fujian Province of China and in Amsterdam of the Netherlands at the end of 2015, [2] fearing that a statute of limitation might bar their case. 626, Date of judgment: 4 December 2020. [2]
Plaintiff’s counsel sent pre-suit notice to all potential defendants on July 3, 2020, and those notices included medical release forms that were allegedly HIPAA complaint pursuant to Tenn. 29, 2022), plaintiff alleged that he was injured by defendants’ medical negligence on July 5, 2019. Code Ann. § 29-26-121(a)(2)(E).
In May 2020, defendant filed a Rule 60.02(3) The trial court ultimately granted defendant’s motion and found that the judgment was void, which the Court of Appeals affirmed. While the Court agreed with plaintiff that Tenn. 3) motion seeking relief from the judgment on the grounds that it was void. In Turner v.
The state passed the COVID-19 Emergency Eviction and Foreclosure Prevention Act of 2020 (“CEEFPA”), [1] allowing tenants to self-certify that they suffered from hardship because of the pandemic. [2] In Manhattan, the Housing Court took a more direct approach to the ERAP issue when applying a textualist review of the law. [17]
Secondly, a court can validly exercise jurisdiction over a defendant in an action in personam where such defendant submits to the court’s jurisdiction or waives his right to raise a jurisdictional challenge. Thus, a court may only stretch its jurisdictional arm outside its territory in certain limited circumstances. [12]
16, 2020), plaintiff filed suit under the Governmental Tort Liability Act (GTLA) after he was injured in a car accident. Based on these findings, the Courtruled that plaintiff had not met the requirements of the first exception to the Public Duty Doctrine. In Kimble v. Dyer County Tennessee , No. W2019-02042-COA-R3-CV (Tenn.
In a rare ruling, the court granted review in Munoz v. The statute proscribes a reviewing court from “render[ing] a decision in a proceeding. ” The Supreme Court’s order depublishes the appellate court’s opinion. See In re Shaputis (2011) 53 Cal.4th 4th 1521, 1533.)”
It is my understanding that additional exercises should be available May 2020. As students electronically answer each question, Core Knowledge instantly provides feedback and an explanation of the right anwer.
First, she argued that “our Supreme Court’s opinion in Martin entitles Plaintiff to conduct discovery because the burden of proof lies with her to prove substantial compliance with pre-suit notice.” (See See Martin v. Rolling Hills Hosp., LLC, 600 S.W.3d 3d 322 (Tenn.
While defendant urged the Court to “follow the modern trend taken in federal courts, which no longer requires renewal of a motion for directed verdict at the close of all the proof,” the Court declined to change long-standing Tennessee law. Accordingly, the Courtruled that, pursuant to Tenn.
Then, in 2009 , the California Supreme Courtruled that the callousness of the original crime couldn’t be a parole board’s sole criterion for denying a person freedom. There’s no rationale between what he did then and his current dangerousness, that’s why we have the youth offender statute,” Shaddow said. “We
In 2020, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit found in favor of Spain, again applying Spanish law. It is important to note that both the district judge and the court of appeals determined the application of Spanish law because they were applying federal choice of law rules.
The court also declined to vacate BLM’s leasing decisions and instead enjoined BLM from issuing drilling permits for the leases while it responds to the court’s decision. Trade Groups Proceeding with Narrower Challenge to 2016 Refrigerant Management Rule; NRDC and States Challenge 2020 Rescission of Portion of Rule.
A US federal judge ruled Monday that Georgia’s anti-BDS law, which prohibits state contractors from boycotting Israel, violates the First Amendment and the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The courtruled in favor of Martin, and found that O.C.G.A. § 50-5-85 was constitutional.
The court granted the Attorney General’s petition for review in People v. Howard (2020) 50 Cal.App.5th The cases concern resentencing a defendant whose felony-murder conviction is tossed under subsequent legislation narrowing the felony-murder rule. Rules of Court, rule 8.528(d); In re Benoit (1973) 10 Cal.3d
The Federal Court Legislation Amendment Rules 2022 (Cth) (‘Amendment Rules’) came into force on 13 January 2023. Among other things, they amend the Federal CourtRules 2011 (Cth) (‘FCR’) by repealing division 10.4, The Amendment Rules replace the old division 10.4 1] Civil Procedure Rules 2006 (ACT) div 6.8.9;
The appellate courtruled that the mandate is not unconstitutional, as was argued in the initial lawsuit filed in 2020 by healthcare provider Women’s Med Group and three of its patients. People who undergo abortions can choose to take custody of the remains and dispose of them on their own accord.
A federal appeals courtruled that Gonzalez’s case could not go forward because she had not provided examples of others who had engaged in the same kind of conduct but had not engaged in protected speech and had not been arrested. The district attorney ultimately declined to pursue the charges against Gonzalez.
Corpus linguistics is a tool used to identify the original public meaning of words – no small thing when the outcome of a case often hinges on the meaning of a single word in a statute or the Constitution. 2020); Health Freedom Def. These examples underscore corpus linguistics’ utility in ascertaining the meaning of statutes.
Editors note – I invited Professor Nina Mendelson (University of Michigan Law School) to author a guest post after reading her 2020 Admin. The exclusivity provision specifically bars reliance on a statute “providing general authority” to an agency head to “delegate” or “reassign” duties.
The missing ingredient in our February 2020 deal with the Taliban and traditional plea bargaining is the failure of both agreements to provide certainty based on the contingency of a loss or guilty verdict. When defendants reject a plea deal, they are typically subject to much higher penalties if convicted at trial. In fact, the U.S.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content