This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
This marks the second time that the court of NSW in Australia enforces Chinese judgment after Bao v Qu; Tian (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 588. [2]. Under the principle of reciprocity, Chinese court may enforce Australian judgments according to Article 288 of Civil ProceduralLaw of China. [14] Ltd (“second original defendant”) and Ms.
By Zhengxin Huo, Professor of Law, China University of Polit’l Science and Law; Associate Member of International Academy of Comparative Law; Observer of the UNESCO 1970 Convention. The Court, thereafter, held the hearings on 26 July and 12 October of 2018 respectively, and publicly pronounced the judgement on 4 December 2020.
2020) 235 ). 2020) 217). Nonetheless, it has to be acknowledged that, in the context of the recognition and enforcement of foreign family law decisions, several issues remain open. See also Prof. Yasuhiro Okudas translation in 50 ZJapanR/J. Whether reciprocity is established (Art.
Jurisdiction is a fundamental aspect of Nigerian procedurallaw. 1] The concept of jurisdiction in Nigerian conflict of laws (often called “territorial jurisdiction” by many Nigerian judges) is the most confusing aspect of Nigerian conflict of laws. 2013) 39 Commonwealth Law Bulletin 333; Bamodu O., “In
„Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters: Explanatory Report“, as approved by the HCCH on 22 September 2020 (available here). Judgments Convention: Application to Governments”, Netherlands International Law Review (NILR) 67 (2020), pp 121-137.
„Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters: Explanatory Report“, as approved by the HCCH on 22 September 2020 (available here). Judgments Convention: Application to Governments”, Netherlands International Law Review (NILR) 67 (2020), pp 121-137.
„Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters: Explanatory Report“, as approved by the HCCH on 22 September 2020 (available here). Judgments Convention: Application to Governments”, Netherlands International Law Review (NILR) 67 (2020), pp 121-137. 187-214.
„Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters: Explanatory Report“, as approved by the HCCH on 22 September 2020 (available here). Judgments Convention: Application to Governments”, Netherlands International Law Review (NILR) 67 (2020), pp 121-137.
„Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters: Explanatory Report“, as approved by the HCCH on 22 September 2020 (available here). Judgments Convention: Application to Governments”, Netherlands International Law Review (NILR) 67 (2020), pp 121-137. 187-214.
„Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters: Explanatory Report“, as approved by the HCCH on 22 September 2020 (available here). Judgments Convention: Application to Governments”, Netherlands International Law Review (NILR) 67 (2020), pp 121-137.
„Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters: Explanatory Report“, as approved by the HCCH on 22 September 2020 (available here). Judgments Convention: Application to Governments”, Netherlands International Law Review (NILR) 67 (2020), pp 121-137.
„Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters: Explanatory Report“, as approved by the HCCH on 22 September 2020 (available here). Judgments Convention: Application to Governments”, Netherlands International Law Review (NILR) 67 (2020), pp 121-137.
Magnus: A new Private International Law and new Procedural Rules for Adoptions in Germany. As a result of two recent reforms the German private international and procedurallaws applicable to adoptions have changed quite substantively. The few provisions on choice of law are based on the EuErbVO. 17 CPC 1996.
79-109 (available here ) Amurodov, Jahongir “Some issues of Ratification of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters (2019) by the Republic of Uzbekistan”, Uzbek Law Review 2020-03, pp. University of Pittsburgh Law Review 82 (2021), pp. Fernández Arroyo (eds.),
Early Marriage in Germany: Law and Politics of Cultural Demarcation Stefan Arnold [The Chapter] examines the German law on early marriage with a focus on the recent statute effective from 1 July 2024. Ulf Maunsbach argues for allowing individual exceptions to enable authorities and courts to make carefully considered decisions.
79-109 (available here ) Amurodov, Jahongir “Some issues of Ratification of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters (2019) by the Republic of Uzbekistan”, Uzbek Law Review 2020-03, pp. University of Pittsburgh Law Review 82 (2021), pp. Fernández Arroyo (eds.),
79-109 (available here ) Amurodov, Jahongir “Some issues of Ratification of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters (2019) by the Republic of Uzbekistan”, Uzbek Law Review 2020-03, pp. University of Pittsburgh Law Review 82 (2021), pp. Fernández Arroyo (eds.),
Wagner: European Conflict of Law2020: EU in crisis mode! This article provides an overview of developments in Brussels in the field of judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters from December 2019 until December 2020. v OOO Insurance Company Chubb (Enka v Chubb).
The ruling demonstrated a pragmatic approach rather than deferring to state court procedural rules, highlighting the court’s focus on minimizing unnecessary delays and costs. #2 It also touches on procedurallaw, particularly the standards for amending a complaint after a motion to dismiss. 2 Sonner v. 4 United States v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content