This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The US Supreme Court Monday granted both Jones v. The Supreme Court previously denied Jones certiorari but granted it after the Eighth Circuit affirmed a lower court’s dismissal of his habeas petition in August 2021. The court is anticipated to hear arguments in these two cases in the fall. ” Jones v.
The United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Thursday instructed the District Court for the Northern District of Georgia to dismiss Marjorie Taylor Greene’s lawsuit over a challenge to her congressional candidacy. Greene asked the district court to bar the challenge.
Share The Supreme Court on Wednesday largely upheld the Food and Drug Administrations denials of two companies applications to sell flavored liquids for use in e-cigarettes. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit set aside the FDAs denial of the two companies applications. The full U.S.
The Bombay High Court on Friday stayed two provisions of India’s Information Technology Rules (“the Rules” or “Rules”) intended to regulate publishers of digital content such as social media intermediaries, OTT (Over-the-top) platforms, and online news and current affairs websites.
The Danish Court of Impeachment, or Rigsretten, Monday sentenced former Danish immigration minister Inger Støjberg to 60 days in prison. As immigration minister, Støjberg was responsible for administrating and enforcing Danish immigration law during the 2015 European migration crisis.
The US National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) ruled Monday that Starbucks violated federal labor laws by firing two workers who were planning to organize a union at a Philadelphia store in 2020. The case predates the massive unionizing of Starbucks workers across the country, which began in 2021.
The Indian Supreme Court on Monday issued notice in a petition challenging the All India Bar Examination Rules 2010 which require an advocate to qualify for the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) within two years after enrolment to a State Bar Council. Bar Council of India and Indian Council of Legal Aid & Advice v. Bar Council of India.
In the 2018 case, the plaintiffs were found not to have standing because their interest in not suffering damage from climate change was not considered an individual interest to be protected (see Japanese Courts Admit the Operation of New Coal-Fired Power Plants in Kobe for more discussion).
The JAA would extend the same basic workplace protections that apply to most other workers, to judiciary employees who support the daily functioning of our courts; and it would ensure that judges who interpret federal anti-discrimination laws, are themselves subject to them. Many thought LAPs Clerkships Database couldnt be done.
The Supreme Court of Japan may soon weigh in on a growing field of climate litigation in Japan against coal-fired power plants. On May 6, 2022, the Citizens’ Committee on the Kobe Coal-Fired Power Plant filed an appeal to Japan’s Supreme Court in Citizens’ Committee on the Kobe Coal-Fired Power Plant v. Administrative complaints.
environmental and administrativelaw cases recently decided. SUPREME COURT. The federal government depends on the service of thousands of AdministrativeLaw Judges (ALJs), most of whom are appointed or selected by the head of an agency or internal agency boards. the President alone.or Continue Reading ›.
Koblitz — You know a court decision is going to be worth reading when the judges compare FDA’s regulatory governance of flavored e-cigarettes to a Shakespearean gaslighting. In August 2021, FDA issued a press release announcing the denial of 55,000 flavored e-cigarette applications en masse. By David B. Clissold & Sara W.
This is a brief review of some of the significant environmental (and administrativelaw decisions) released the past few weeks. SUPREME COURT. On April 22, 2021, the Court decided two important administrativelaw cases: Carr, et al. by Anthony B. Saul and AMG Capital Management v.
On December 13, 2021, the Fifth Circuit issued an en banc opinion in Cochran v. Securities & Exchange Commission et al., finding that the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 does not strip.
The courts have issued several new and significant rulings on environmental and administrativelaw the past few weeks. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. by Anthony B. Truck Trailer Manufacturers Association, Inc. See 81 FR 73478.)
But a Middle District of Pennsylvania court recently established one key limit on states’ authority to block new transmission lines through the siting process. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania issued a decision on December 6, 2023 in Transource Pa. The PUC adopted and incorporated the ALJ decision in May 2021.
On March 11, 2021, the esteemed Christie’s auction house sold a digital artwork (titled Everydays ) by an artist named Beeple for $69,346,250 USD. The NFT will have to pass the Howey test, first described by the US Supreme Court in 1946. Beeple (real name, Mike Winkelmann) is a well-known and prolific online digital author.
Share This week we highlight cert petitions (and one original action ) that ask the Supreme Court to consider, among other things, whether New Jersey can withdraw from its Waterfront Commission Compact with New York concerning governance and law enforcement over the Port of New York and New Jersey. In New York v. However, the U.S.
Supreme Court’s decision in Axon Enterprise, Inc. Federal Trade Commission , 598 U.S. _ (2023), allows federal district courts to consider constitutional challenges to administrative proceedings prior to the issuance of final rulings. Cochran’s and Axon’s suits were both dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Supreme Court2021). 2, administrative patent judges of the U.S. Whether, if administrative patent judges are principal officers, the court of appeals properly cured any Appointments Clause defect in the current statutory scheme prospectively by severing the application of 5 U.S.C. by Dennis Crouch. Arthrex, Inc.
Given these stakes, it is no coincidence that South Africa was chosen as the pilot for the Just Energy Transition Partnership (JETP), first announced in 2021 at the 26 th meeting of the conference of the parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP26). billion to support South Africa’s energy transition.
Supreme Court unanimously held in Carr v. Saul, 593 U.S. _ (2021) , that the principles of issue exhaustion do not require Social Security disability claimants to argue at the agency level that the administrativelaw judges hearing their disability claims were unconstitutionally appointed. Supreme Court decided Lucia v.
Law 1931 of 2018 on climate change action. Law 2169 of 2021 on carbon neutrality and climate resilience. These laws, decrees, and resolutions (together the “framework”) fulfill some of Colombia’s international commitments regarding climate change and provide rules to design, implement and evaluate climate action in Colombia.
The Chairwoman also stated that “many of the questions contained in your letter are addressed in either the Hearing Designation Order issued in this case or the Commission’s Opposition to Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed recently with the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit,” both of which are publicly available documents.
In 2021, Illumina, Inc. In September 2022, AdministrativeLaw Judge Chappell dismissed the FTC’s charges against Illumina. [11] In July 2021, the Commission launched an in-depth investigation of the acquisition. [21] In July 2021, the Commission launched an in-depth investigation of the acquisition. [21]
4-5-322, which grants exclusive jurisdiction of such reviews to the Chancery Court. Dismissal from the circuit court based on a lack of subject matter jurisdiction was thus affirmed. 15, 2021), plaintiff was a former firefighter who had initially been denied Line of Duty (LOD) disability benefits by the defendant City’s Pension Board.
As we’ve reported in previous weekly updates, the FCC’s Media Bureau has issued a hearing designation order referring questions about Standard General Broadcasting’s proposed acquisition of the TEGNA broadcast stations to an AdministrativeLaw Judge (ALJ) for an evidentiary hearing.
According to the Press Release announcing his appointment, David Shaw will fill that position after having previously served as an administrativelaw judge on the International Trade Commission for over 10 years. A new Chief Copyright Royalty Judge of the Copyright Royalty Board has just been named by the Librarian of Congress.
The NAB filed a petition with the US Court of Appeals for a “writ of mandamus” to force the FCC to resolve its 2018 Quadrennial Review. As we wrote on our Broadcast Law Blog , the FCC started its 2022 Quadrennial Review in December despite not having concluded its 2018 review.
This article examines the conflicts rules in question and discusses the broader private international law context of the proposed Directive, in particular the rules of jurisdiction and the mosaic approach of the CJEU for the interpretation of Article 7(2) of Regulation Brussels Ia.
As a matter of administrativelaw, the Brand Memo made good sense from the perspective of FDA-regulated industry, as we described here. The memorandum cites the 2019 Supreme Court decision, Kisor v. This policy, announced by then Associate Attorney General Rachel Brand in 2018 was referred to as the Brand Memo. Wilkie , 139 S.
An AdministrativeLaw Judge reviewed the agreement and determined that it restricted competition, but its procompetitive benefits outweighed the anticompetitive effects. On April 13, 2021, the Fifth Circuit upheld the FTC’s Order looking to whether the agreement caused anticompetitive effects that outweigh the procompetitive benefits.
An AdministrativeLaw Judge reviewed the agreement and determined that it restricted competition, but its procompetitive benefits outweighed the anticompetitive effects. On April 13, 2021, the Fifth Circuit upheld the FTC’s Order looking to whether the agreement caused anticompetitive effects that outweigh the procompetitive benefits.
DOC is rescinding the administrative review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on certain non-refillable steel cylinders (non-refillable cylinders) from the People’s Republic China (China), covering the period August 28, 2020, though December 31, 2021. . DOC announced on October 9, 2019, in the U.S.
District Court for the District of Texas on Zarzamora Healthcare LLC for repeatedly dispensing opioids and other controlled substances “by filling prescriptions while ignoring red flags.” The Coconut Grove decision introduces no new red flags, but further clarifies DEA’s expectations, especially in the context of Florida’s standard of care.
The US Supreme Court ruled Tuesday in Moore v. The theory stipulates that state legislatures retain exclusive authority over the administration of elections; therefore, state courts are not allowed to intervene, even if the law in question violates the state constitution.
Action continued this week on the FCC’s Media Bureau’s hearing designation order referring questions about Standard General Broadcasting’s proposed acquisition of the TEGNA broadcast stations to an AdministrativeLaw Judge (ALJ) for an evidentiary hearing.
This is a brief account of some of the important environmental and administrativelaw cases recently decided. SUPREME COURT . On June 28, 2021, the Supreme Court decided the case of Pakdel v. Comments are due by August 27, 2021. City and County of San Francisco. City and County of San Francisco.
Citrique Belge) did not sell subject merchandise in the United States at prices below normal value during the July 1, 2020, through June 30, 2021, period of review (POR). at less than normal value (NV) during the period of review: July 1, 2020, through June 30, 2021. Court of International Trade . Citrique Belge N.V.
New Patently-O Law Journal article by David Boundy , a partner at Potomac Law Group, PLLC. Mr. Boundy practices at the intersection of patent and administrativelaw, and consults with other firms on court and administrative agency proceedings, including PTAB trials and appeals. HowToUseGuidance.pdf.
Share The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. At this Friday’s conference, the Supreme Court will thus begin the process of considering what cases to review next fall during October Term 2022. The district court and U.S. What’s the difference ?
Ethel Zatyko and Rena Pettypiece had taken a twelve-month course in the hope of becoming court stenographers. They wrote letters of application to court officials. But when the answers came, their hopes were dashed: the RCAF might recruit women wireless operators, but Alberta doesnt allow women court reporters.
Share The Supreme Court on Monday ruled that a North Dakota truck stop can bring a challenge to a regulation issued 13 years ago by the Federal Reserve Board. In 2021, when Corner Post, a truck stop and convenience store in Watford City, N.D., A federal district court dismissed the case.
Share The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. Just before the Supreme Court begins its new term on the first Monday in October , the court gathers to consider all the hundreds of cert petitions that have built up over the summer. At issue in Oklahoma v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content