This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Folks, Folks Hess, PLLC (1/2021). 2007) (a cause of action “accrues” each time a party fails to perform as required by the contract) and Ortiz v. 2015) (each time the debtor fails to make a payment when it becomes due, a separate breach occurs and a cause of action “accrues”, starting the clock). Short answer: No.
The purpose of this write up is to briefly highlight the confusion on the concept of jurisdiction in Nigerian conflict of laws through the lens of a very recently reported case (reported last week) of Attorney General of Yobe State v Maska & Ano r. (“ Maska” ). [2]. 10] This approach softens the strict territorial jurisdiction approach.
27, 2021, it formally notified New York that it intends to withdraw. whose attorneys contribute to SCOTUSblog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case. whose attorneys contribute to SCOTUSblog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case. O’Donnell & Sons, Inc.
Although the case does not involve submission to AI algorithms, some of the questions here are similar to those many IP attorneys are considering when onboarding new AI tools. The consequences: in 2021, a patent application surfaced in Australia that appears to have been derived from Neuropublic’s confidential disclosure.
Tennessee is not only the Supreme Court’s first oral argument of the 2021-22 term, but it is also the first time that states have asked the court to weigh in on how they should share an interstate aquifer. Share Mississippi v. The case will be argued on Monday, and it will be the court’s first in-person argument in a year and a half.
The holding is important–repeated and specific threats of litigation by an out-of-state patentee can be sufficient to establish personal jurisdiction for a declaratory judgment action. [2] Its sole employee is Robert Babayi–a patent attorney practicing in Washington DC who has apparently never visited the Texas office.
In February 2021, US Inventor and others collectively sued the USPTO asking the court to order the USPTO to issue rulemaking regarding discretionary considerations at the institution stage of AIA Trials. Case Dismissed : Judge Gilstrap dismissed the case in July 2021 — agreeing with the USPTO that the plaintiffs lacked standing.
Starting in 2021, she alleges, she became “the driving force” behind ClaimDeck, while employed by both the law firm and the company. Within weeks of expressing that intent, the defendants fired her without cause, she claims, alleging that their actual motive was to deprive her of the compensation she had earned. .”
Lots of work over the years has gone into determining whether a particular cause of action meets the arising under requirement of these provisions. 251 (2013) (patent litigation attorney malpractice lawsuit does not arise under the Patent Act). Sasso (Supreme Court 2021). .” 28 U.S.C. See, for example, Gunn v.
Another noteworthy case is In re Shanghai International Corporation (2021) Hu 03 Xie Wai Ren No.1, Each case has been reviewed and more details, such as the grounds, the case numbers, and causes of action, have been added. Zhou v Jing [2023] NSWSC 214 (Australia), [21] Yin v Wu [2023] VSCA 130 (Australia) [22] ).
. § 55-8-136, which is a Class C misdemeanor, the statute of limitations for plaintiff’s action was extended to two years pursuant to Tenn. 28, 2021), plaintiff was injured in a car accident with defendant in September 2017. Code Ann. § 28-3-104(a)(2). In Younger v. Okbahhanes , No. E2020-00429-COA-R10-CV (Tenn.
As a landmark judicial policy issued by China’s Supreme People’s Court, the 2021 Conference Summary provides a detailed guideline for Chinese courts to review foreign judgment-related applications. EB-5 Visa fraud judgments, but rejected the punitive damages awarded therein, echoing the same rule laid down in the 2021 Conference Summary.
On December 07, 2021, the Federal Regional Court of the Fourth Region (TRF4) – one of Brazil’s federal courts of appeal – decided what should be the competent jurisdiction to hear the case of IEA v. In July 2021, the Federal District Court of Curitiba issued an order rejecting jurisdiction and transferring the case to the Court of Amazonas.
The Second District, Division Eight, published opinion held an attorney fee award for the plaintiff-attorney was not too small. In Sujan , the unpublished opinion of the Fourth District, Division Two, held that the plaintiff’s causes of action for. Superior Court (2021) 11 Cal.5th 5th 381. (See
July 16, 2021), plaintiff and defendant were brother and sister. The second element required plaintiff to show that she “could not have discovered the cause of action despite exercising reasonable care and diligence.” In Pomeroy v. McGinnis , No. E2020-00960-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. internal citation omitted).
Tod Tumey is a Houston-based patent attorney who represents Voice Tech Corp. Back in 2021, VoiceTech sued Mycroft for patent infringement. Tumey sued Mycroft as well as Mycroft founder Joshua Montgomery and CEO Michael Lewis on several causes of action: . Tod Tumey v. Mycroft AI ( 8th Cir. Racketeering.
As I reported here in November , the law firm Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld has sued Xcential for misappropriation of trade secrets, breach of contract, and other causes of action. Akin Gump claims one of its attorneys, Louis Agnello , is the actual inventor of Bill Synthesis. The Holy Grail?
The daughter of civil rights leader Malcolm X filed a civil action Friday against the US, the city of New York, and the estates of various former federal agents for their alleged role in concealing, condoning, and facilitating X’s assassination in 1965. The family of Malcolm X is represented by noted civil rights attorney Ben Crump.
Supreme Court scheduled oral argument for January 19, 2021 in fossil fuel companies’ appeal of a Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals decision affirming an order remanding to state court the City of Baltimore’s climate change case against the companies. the court continued the case management conference scheduled for December 16 to June 9, 2021.
Arizona Residential Eviction Actions Procedures – effective July 15, 2021. Parties, attorneys, and witnesses in an eviction proceeding shall be permitted to participate remotely or in person. The post Update on Arizona Eviction Proceedings – July, 15, 2021 appeared first on Diane L.
After a two-year investigation, Aziz and one of his co-defendants, Khalil Islam, were exonerated in November 2021 when then-Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. Aziz’s lawyers have filed six causes of action against the city, demanded a jury trial and requested at least USD 40 million in compensatory damages.
Application of Singapore’s new rules on service out of jurisdiction: Three Arrows Capital and NW Corp The Rules of Court 2021 (‘ROC 2021’) entered into force on 1 April 2022. Among other things, ROC 2021 reformed the rules on service out of jurisdiction (previously discussed here ).
Griffen then appealed and the attorney for the Haunted Hotel quoted Hunter S. The other employees were reportedly shaken up and Logan County Prosecuting Attorney John Bennett later suspended White. The retailer filed a motion for partial summary judgment as to plaintiffs’ cause of action for failure to warn.
2021, the bankruptcy court confirmed a reorganization plan that would remake the company as a nonprofit devoted to addressing the public-health problems created by the opioid epidemic – by, for example, funding the development of an OTC nasal spray to treat opioid dependence, as well as a drug to reverse opioid overdoses. And in Sept.
They also seek punitive damages, disgorgement of profits, pre-judgment interest, attorneys’ and expert witness fees and other costs, and other equitable, declaratory, and/or injunctive relief “to assure … an effective remedy.”. Cases brought by cities. Building on corporate accountability cases worldwide.
The appellate court held to be improper a city attorney’s delegation to the police in infraction cases of discovery obligations under Brady v. 83 and it ordered dismissed an action for overnight camping in Balboa Park. Valencia (2021) 11 Cal.5th Navarro (2021) 12 Cal.5th Maryland (1963) 373 U.S. 333 (Stats.
S. _ (2021), by a vote of 5-4, with Chief Justice John Roberts siding with the liberal justices. The defendants included various state officials, including the Executive Directors of the Texas Medical Board (TMB), Texas Board of Nursing, and Texas Board of Pharmacy, as well as the Commissioner of HHSC, and the Attorney General.
In October 2021, Danielle Thomas, former exotic dancer known as “Pole Assassin” (and the girlfriend of Texas special teams coach Jeff Banks), found herself embroiled in a Halloween tort after the monkey previously used in her act bit a wandering child at the house of horror she created for Halloween. Again, the court agreed.
Doe , 20-1374 , concerns whether Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act (and Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act, which incorporates its enforcement mechanisms) provides a disparate-impact cause of action for plaintiffs alleging disability discrimination, and whether such claims can be based on facially neutral health-plan terms.
In doing so, Judge Arthur Engoron granted New York Attorney General Letitia James’ motion for partial summary judgment and effectively ordered the dissolution of “any of the entity defendants” and “any other entity controlled or beneficially owned by” Trump and his business associates. billion each year.
3, 2021); Vecinos para el Bienestar de la Comunidad Costera v. On September 8, 2021, a federal district court in New Jersey granted the City of Hoboken’s motion to remand to state court its climate change lawsuit against oil and gas companies. 20, 2021), No. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission , No. 20-1045 (D.C. Minnesota v.
Circuit’s order also established the briefing schedule for the cases, with three initial briefs from petitioners due on January 14, 2021, respondents’ brief due April 14, 2021, and reply briefs due June 1, 2021. California v. Wheeler , No. 20-1357 (D.C. The plaintiffs plan to appeal.
In October 2021, Danielle Thomas, former exotic dancer known as “Pole Assassin” (and the girlfriend of Texas special teams coach Jeff Banks), found not just herself but her pet monkey and emotional support animal Gia (who once performed with her in her act) in a tort lawsuit. particularly those with ravenous monkeys.
The district court dismissed the claims against Egbert, noting that causes of action under Bivens v. But a panel of the 9th Circuit reversed, holding that Bivens actions are available for such claims against Border Patrol officers. CVSG: 9/27/2021. Issues : (1) Whether a cause of action exists under Bivens v.
June 15, 2021). June 16, 2021). On June 14, 2021, the U.S. On June 23, 2021, Chevron Corporation filed notice in the district court of its voluntary dismissal of third-party complaints against the energy company Equinor ASA (formerly Statoil ASA). June 14, 2021). June 28, 2021). June 25, 2021).
By the third day of trial Wednesday morning, Trump had already unleashed yet “ another attack on ‘corrupt’ attorney general ” Letitia James. Will these attorneys also be sanctioned during the trial or fined at the end of the case? That is real estate’.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content