This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Eight years on from the last set of major changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) governing e-discovery, you might think that the practice of e-discovery had settled down into a comfortable status quo. And all of these platforms are fair game for discovery. The usual rules of discovery apply.
Whereas 2020 ended with a newfound sense of the possible, 2021 ends with us still not knowing what is ahead, and therefore which way to turn. Whereas 2020 ended with great promise for regulatory reform, 2021 ends with little further progress on that front – and even retreats to some extent. I should be more optimistic.
According to the report, “84% of respondents report personally using remote access software for law-related tasks (compared with 76% in 2021, 75% in 2020, and 73% in 2019). Calendaring. For many years the most important software for solos and small firms continues to be word processing, calendaring, and time & billing.
Whereas 2020 ended with a newfound sense of the possible, 2021 ends with us still not knowing what is ahead, and therefore which way to turn. Whereas 2020 ended with great promise for regulatory reform, 2021 ends with little further progress on that front – and even retreats to some extent. I should be more optimistic.
E-discovery. For example, 38% of surveyed lawyers say that legal billing software with invoicing features saves them six to 15+ hours per month (per the MyCase 2021 Legal Industry Report ). . In fact, our 2021 Legal Industry Report found that 88% of firms now use cloud SaaS products , compared to 76% before the pandemic.
Calendaring / Docketing. e-Discovery. According to the ABA TechReport 2021 , 88 percent of firms turn to colleagues for their input when assessing legal tech. Here’s just a snapshot of some of the different types of legal tech you can choose from: Accounting . Appointment Booking . Billing / Accounts Receivable (AR) .
Litigation Technology & E-Discovery. These days, cybersecurity awareness training should be on every firm’s calendar at least once a year and more if possible. According to the 2021 Verizon Data Breach Investigation Report, phishing was present in 36% of breaches. The survey results are provided in five volumes.
Case Chronology software allows users to work on a page once while automatically generating Reports, Search Features, Duplicate Detection, Analysis Filters, Interactive Calendars, and Timelines. Since 2021, our solutions have been used on c.50 What makes you unique or innovative? What makes you unique or innovative?
Altumatim Elevator Pitch: Altumatim is the story-based eDiscovery platform that fully automates document review and finds the most important evidence by learning the story the attorney wants to tell. We are constantly innovating and will continue to provide the most cutting-edge technology within the eDiscovery marketplace. and Beagle.
Founded: 7/6/2021. From launch, we closed our first customer in December 2021. Founded: 4/1/2021. Launching January 2022, our AI-driven engine will automate litigation processes like lawsuit and motion drafting, discovery preparation, procedural calendaring and much more by turning days of work into 2-3 minute-long activities.
Founded: 7/6/2021. From launch, we closed our first customer in December 2021. Founded: 4/1/2021. Launching January 2022, our AI-driven engine will automate litigation processes like lawsuit and motion drafting, discovery preparation, procedural calendaring and much more by turning days of work into 2-3 minute-long activities.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content