2021 Cause of Action Court Decisions 
Conflict of Laws
MAY 31, 2021
However, the defendant/appellant challenged the jurisdiction of the Kastina State High Court to hear the case on the basis that the contract in issue was concluded in Yobe State, where it claimed the cause of action arose, which it argued was outside the jurisdiction of Kastina State. 2] (2021) 7 NWLR (Pt. 1776) 535. [3]
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
DECEMBER 21, 2021
Brazil: When a court accepts the legally disruptive nature of climate change. On December 07, 2021, the Federal Regional Court of the Fourth Region (TRF4) – one of Brazil’s federal courts of appeal – decided what should be the competent jurisdiction to hear the case of IEA v. The Federal Court of Appeal’s decision.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Conflict of Laws
SEPTEMBER 30, 2024
This decision is also interesting because it is unlikely, if not impossible, to have foreign judgments recognized and enforced in Thailand. Another noteworthy case is In re Shanghai International Corporation (2021) Hu 03 Xie Wai Ren No.1, Zhou v Jing [2023] NSWSC 214 (Australia), [21] Yin v Wu [2023] VSCA 130 (Australia) [22] ).
Conflict of Laws
AUGUST 24, 2022
Please also note that in the UK case , the Shanghai Maritime Court of China ruled to recognize and enforce an English judgment, marking the first time that an English monetary judgment has been enforced in China based on reciprocity. Each case has been reviewed and more details, such as the case numbers and causes of action, have been added.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
MAY 12, 2023
Local and state government plaintiffs want the cases to remain in state court, where they argue that climate nuisance claims are similar to past state law-based efforts to hold companies accountable for misleading the public about their products’ harms, like those against tobacco companies. This requires an analysis of the claims themselves.
Constitutional Law Reporter
SEPTEMBER 23, 2024
In 2021, Corner Post joined a suit brought against the Board under APA. According to the majority, an APA claim does not accrue for purposes of §2401(a)’s 6-year statute of limitations until the plaintiff is injured by final agency action. The Board subsequently published Regulation II, which sets a maximum interchange fee of $0.21
Conflict of Laws
MARCH 29, 2023
One may wonder whether the Kentucky Court agrees with this assessment – that a foreign court’s injunction restraining enforcement of its judgment effectively amounts to an act of comity.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
98 
Let's personalize your content