Remove 2021 Remove Cause of Action Remove Litigation Remove Statute
article thumbnail

No cause of action against employers for take-home COVID

At the Lectern

The court also holds that California’s worker’s compensation statutes don’t bar the action. ” “[E]xclusivity provisions bar a third party claim only when proof of an employee’s injury is required as an element of the cause of action,” the court says. Superior Court (2021) 73 Cal.App.5th

article thumbnail

New York sues New Jersey over compact governing Port of New York and New Jersey

SCOTUSBlog

To create the compact, each state passed statutes and, as New York’s bill of complaint indicates is a constitutional requirement for interstate compacts, Congress consented as well. However, in 2018, New Jersey passed a statute to withdraw from the compact, and on Dec. However, the U.S. Disclosure : Goldstein & Russell, P.C.,

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Exclusive: You keep using that word; I don’t think you know what it means.

Patently O

There are two different statutes regarding Federal Court exclusive jurisdiction over patent cases. 1338(a) provides Federal district courts with “original jurisdiction of any civil action arising under any Act of Congress relating to patents.” Sasso (Supreme Court 2021). by Dennis Crouch. See, for example, Gunn v.

Contract 100
article thumbnail

Territorial Jurisdiction for Breach of Contract in Nigeria or whatever

Conflict of Laws

However, the defendant/appellant challenged the jurisdiction of the Kastina State High Court to hear the case on the basis that the contract in issue was concluded in Yobe State, where it claimed the cause of action arose, which it argued was outside the jurisdiction of Kastina State. 2] (2021) 7 NWLR (Pt. 1776) 535. [3]

article thumbnail

Nirvana Stuck in Lawsuit Over Nevermind Album Cover

The IP Law Blog

In 2021, at the age of 30, he filed his lawsuit and after two rounds of amended pleadings, filed a second amended complaint in January 2022. 2255, which allows victims of child pornography to bring a civil cause of action. He turned 18 in 2009. Mr. Elden asserts a single claim against the defendants for violation of 18 U.S.C.

article thumbnail

How does the USPTO Decide the Discretionary Aspect of Institution?

Patently O

In February 2021, US Inventor and others collectively sued the USPTO asking the court to order the USPTO to issue rulemaking regarding discretionary considerations at the institution stage of AIA Trials. In this case, the PTO argued (1) that the statute does not require rules on that discretionary aspect of institution. Hirshfeld , No.

Statute 80
article thumbnail

Ford v. Montana: Supreme Court on the Scope of Personal Jurisdiction

Patently O

Montana 8th Judicial District ( Supreme Court 2021 ). 2017) refocused attention on a required nexus between the the defendant’s contacts with the forum state and the cause of action. The decision suggested to many that defendant’s connections should have a causal-link with the cause of action.

Court 63