Remove 2021 Remove Cause of Action Remove Tort
article thumbnail

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Alien Tort Statute

Constitutional Law Reporter

S. _ (2021), the U.S. By a vote of 8-1, the Court held that to plead facts sufficient to support a domestic application of the Alien Tort Statute, 28 U.S.C. The post Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Alien Tort Statute appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. In Nestlé USA, Inc. Doe , 593 U.

Tort 59
article thumbnail

No cause of action against employers for take-home COVID

At the Lectern

” “[E]xclusivity provisions bar a third party claim only when proof of an employee’s injury is required as an element of the cause of action,” the court says. Superior Court (2021) 73 Cal.App.5th ” The opinion does, however, leave unaddressed some issues that could change the bottom line.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

United Kingdom Supreme Court confirms that consequential loss satisfies the tort gateway for service out of the jurisdiction

Conflict of Laws

In FS Cairo (Nile Plaza) LLC v Lady Brownlie [2021] UKSC 45 (“ Brownlie II ”), the Supreme Court held as a matter of ratio by a 4:1 majority that consequential loss satisfies the ‘tort gateway’ in Practice Direction (“ PD ”) 6B, para. Economic torts? This post is written by Joshua Folkard, Barrister at Twenty Essex. Background.

Tort 52
article thumbnail

Tennessee Supreme Court Agrees to Review Comparative Fault Issue in Negligent Misrepresentation Case

Day on Torts

The Tennessee Supreme Court has agreed to accept review of a comparative fault issue concerning the tort of negligent misrepresentation. Here is a copy of the court of appeals opinion in the case , decided on March 10, 2021. The case is Pryority Partnership v. The case is Pryority Partnership v. AMT Properties, LLC , No.

article thumbnail

Anti-Suit Injunctions and Dispute Resolution Clauses

Conflict of Laws

Subsequently, Asiana also pursued actions against GGS and the directors of the Gate Gourmet Group. It alleged that the directors were actively involved in the chairmans unlawful conduct and therefore liable in tort under Korean law, and GGS was vicariously liable for their actions. 9] [2021] 2 SLR 753. [10]

Tort 45
article thumbnail

In a first for climate nuisance claims, a Hawai‘i State Court allowed Honolulu to proceed with its case against fossil fuel companies

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Starting in 2017, cities, counties, and states across the United States have filed claims (see here and here ) in state courts against fossil fuel companies seeking redress for the climate harms their products have caused. Many of these cases asserted nuisance and other tort law claims.

Court 85
article thumbnail

Smith v Fonterra: A Common Law Climate Litigation Breakthrough

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

A civil law breakthrough came in 2021, with the ruling of a Dutch court against Shell. Michael Smith brought tort claims against New Zealand’s seven largest GHG emitters, which are collectively responsible for one-third of all New Zealand GHG emissions. As this open-ended definition suggests, public nuisance is a slippery tort.