2021 Constitutional Law Court Decisions 
Constitutional Law Reporter
JANUARY 19, 2023
Supreme Court agreed to keep the federal government’s Title 42 policy in place while legal challenges continue. By a vote of 5-4, the justices stayed a lower court decision that would have lifted the policy on December 21, 2022. Alejandro Mayorkas et al.,
Conflict of Laws
MAY 31, 2021
9] This approach is that a Nigerian court cannot assume jurisdiction where the cause of action arose in one State, or another foreign country. This approach is that more than one court can have jurisdiction in matters of conflict of laws where the cause of action is connected to such States. 2] (2021) 7 NWLR (Pt.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Constitutional Law Reporter
SEPTEMBER 23, 2024
In 2021, Corner Post joined a suit brought against the Board under APA. The post SCOTUS Clarifies Statute of Limitations for APA Claims appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. The Board subsequently published Regulation II, which sets a maximum interchange fee of $0.21 per transaction plus.05%
Constitutional Law Reporter
JUNE 22, 2023
It held that Tyler’s claim that the County illegally appropriated the $25,000 surplus constitutes a “classic pocketbook injury sufficient to give her standing” under TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez , 594 U.S. , (2021). The taxpayer must render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s, but no more.”
Constitutional Law Reporter
MAY 30, 2023
Each suit premised jurisdiction on district courts’ ordinary federal-question authority to resolve “civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States.” The post Supreme Court Greenlights Pre-enforcement Challenges to FTC and SEC Proceedings appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter.
Constitutional Law Reporter
FEBRUARY 28, 2022
The suit before the Supreme Court alleges that Alabama’s electoral maps are racially gerrymandered in violation of the United States Constitution and/or dilute the votes of Black Alabamians in violation of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. All of the plaintiffs requested a preliminary injunction barring Alabama Secretary of State John H.
JonathanTurley
MAY 9, 2021
The family court decision was reviewed by Judges Stan Pritzker, John Egan Jr., They admit that the rock was “not addressed by family court or the attorney for the child, the mother’s testimony at the hearing, as well as an exhibit admitted into evidence.” However, the mother’s home was left as the child’s residence.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
59 
Let's personalize your content