2021 Constitutional Law Court Rules Statute 
JURIST
OCTOBER 31, 2023
Originally, the law allowed four reasons for reopening a case: forgery of documents, false statements by a witness, judicial negligence or valid confessions post-trial. In 2021, the Bundestag added a fifth provision. However, the court found the 2021 reform conflicted with Article 103 of the Basic Law.
Constitutional Law Reporter
FEBRUARY 23, 2021
S. _ (2021), the U.S. Supreme Court held that Germany was entitled to State immunity in a lawsuit seeking compensation for the forced sale of medieval art known as the “Welfenschatz” during the rise of Nazi Germany. The justices remanded the case back to the lower court to consider the latter argument. Philipp , 592 U.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Constitutional Law Reporter
FEBRUARY 22, 2021
S. _ (2021), a divided U.S. Supreme Court held that a refusal by the U.S. The decision represents the first 5-to-4 split in a case argued during the Court’s 2020-21 term. The post Divided Court Rules U.S. Railroad Retirement Board Decision Subject to Judicial Review appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter.
Constitutional Law Reporter
SEPTEMBER 15, 2021
S. _ (2021), the U.S. By a vote of 5-4, the justices held that only a plaintiff concretely harmed by a defendant’s violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) has Article III standing to seek damages against that private defendant in federal court. In TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez , 594 U. Robins, 578 U.S.
Constitutional Law Reporter
JULY 12, 2023
Supreme Court ruled that Texas and Louisiana lacked standing to challenge a Biden Administration immigration enforcement policy. According to the eight-member majority, “federal courts are generally not the proper forum for resolving claims that the Executive Branch should make more arrests or bring more prosecutions.”
Constitutional Law Reporter
FEBRUARY 1, 2022
Missouri , the Court ruled that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) rule should be allowed to take effect nationwide as the lower courts consider legal challenges. The rule thus fits neatly within the language of the statute.”. However, held in Biden v.
JURIST
JULY 1, 2024
The US Supreme Court on Monday vacated and remanded lower court rulings regarding the constitutionality of statutes enacted by Florida and Texas to regulate large social media companies’ content moderation practices. Key to the court’s ruling in Moody v.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
211 
Let's personalize your content