This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Assume that you successfully obtained a favourable judgment from a foreign court that orders the losing party to pay punitivedamages in addition to compensatory damages. Could the judgment be enforced in Japan where punitivedamages are considered as contrary to public policy?
It features the following articles, case notes as well as English translation of some relevant courtdecisions relating to private international law. 348) JUDICIAL DECISIONS IN JAPAN ( Private International Law) Supreme Court (3rd Petty Bench), Judgment, May 25, 2021 (p.423) The latest Volume (Vol.
Please also note that in the UK case , the Shanghai Maritime Court of China ruled to recognize and enforce an English judgment, marking the first time that an English monetary judgment has been enforced in China based on reciprocity. Each case has been reviewed and more details, such as the case numbers and causes of action, have been added.
The Supreme Court has handed down a decision in AMG Capital Management, LLC, et al. 22, 2021) [hereinafter Slip Op.], So, the obvious question to many readers is how does this Supreme Courtdecision implicate FDA? Gibbs & John R. Fleder & Michael S. Heesters —. Federal Trade Commission, No. 19-508 (Apr.
A Hawaii court held that the Hawai‘i Environmental Policy Act requires environmental review for commercial taking of aquarium fish and that Department of Land and Natural Resources issuance and renewal of licenses for commercial aquarium collection without environmental review was invalid and illegal. Chevron Corp. , 3:18-cv-07477 (N.D.
Indirekta behörighetsregler och svensk domsrätt – Analys och utredning av svensk domstols behörighet i förhållande till 2019 års Haagkonvention om erkännande och verkställighet” (Examensarbete inom juristprogrammet, avancerad nivå, Örebro Universitet, 2021; available here ). University of Pittsburgh Law Review 82 (2021), pp.
Indirekta behörighetsregler och svensk domsrätt – Analys och utredning av svensk domstols behörighet i förhållande till 2019 års Haagkonvention om erkännande och verkställighet” (Examensarbete inom juristprogrammet, avancerad nivå, Örebro Universitet, 2021; available here ). . University of Pittsburgh Law Review 82 (2021), pp.
“The Hague 2019 Convention for the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judicial Decisions: A Comparative Study”, International Journal of Doctrine, Judiciary, and Legislation (IJDJL) 2 (2021), pp. Les Zones d’ombre de la Convention de La Haye du 2 Juillet 2019”, Revue Internationale de Droit Comparé (RIDC), 73 (2021), pp.
Third, the court failed to consider whether trebling damages is allowed under the FSIA. Section 1606 provides that a foreign state except for an agency or instrumentality thereof shall not be liable for punitivedamages. Walters relied on the Supreme Courtsdecision in First National City Bank v.
Update of 7 December 2021: New entries are printed bold. Les Zones d’ombre de la Convention de La Haye du 2 Juillet 2019”, Revue Internationale de Droit Comparé (RIDC), 73 (2021), pp. The Court Jurisdiction and Proceedings Transfer Act and the Hague Judgments and Jurisdictions Projects”, Osgoode Hall Law Journal 55 (2018), pp 257-304.
Update of 20 November 2021: New entries are printed bold. Les Zones d’ombre de la Convention de La Haye du 2 Juillet 2019”, Revue Internationale de Droit Comparé (RIDC), 73 (2021), pp. The Court Jurisdiction and Proceedings Transfer Act and the Hague Judgments and Jurisdictions Projects”, Osgoode Hall Law Journal 55 (2018), pp 257-304.
Indirekta behörighetsregler och svensk domsrätt – Analys och utredning av svensk domstols behörighet i förhållande till 2019 års Haagkonvention om erkännande och verkställighet” (Examensarbete inom juristprogrammet, avancerad nivå, Örebro Universitet, 2021 ; available here ). University of Pittsburgh Law Review 82 (2021), pp.
Indirekta behörighetsregler och svensk domsrätt – Analys och utredning av svensk domstols behörighet i förhållande till 2019 års Haagkonvention om erkännande och verkställighet” (Examensarbete inom juristprogrammet, avancerad nivå, Örebro Universitet, 2021 ; available here ). University of Pittsburgh Law Review 82 (2021), pp.
Indirekta behörighetsregler och svensk domsrätt – Analys och utredning av svensk domstols behörighet i förhållande till 2019 års Haagkonvention om erkännande och verkställighet” (Examensarbete inom juristprogrammet, avancerad nivå, Örebro Universitet, 2021 ; available here ). University of Pittsburgh Law Review 82 (2021), pp.
11-116 (available here ) Arslan, Ilyas “The 2019 Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters”, Uluslararasi Ticaret ve Tahkim Hukuku Dergisi 10 (2021), pp. University of Pittsburgh Law Review 82 (2021), pp.
11-116 (available here ) Arslan, Ilyas “The 2019 Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters”, Uluslararasi Ticaret ve Tahkim Hukuku Dergisi 10 (2021), pp. University of Pittsburgh Law Review 82 (2021), pp.
11-116 (available here ) Arslan, Ilyas “The 2019 Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters”, Uluslararasi Ticaret ve Tahkim Hukuku Dergisi 10 (2021), pp. University of Pittsburgh Law Review 82 (2021), pp.
The NHTSA regulations would have taken effect in January 2021. In its stay motion, the Truck Trailer Manufacturers Association (TTMA) argued that the court had already determined that its challenge to the EPA standards was likely to be successful and that the NHTSA standards could not function without the EPA standards. filed Sept.
EPA’s response to the petitions is due June 3, 2021. 29, 2021); North American Coal Corp. DECISIONS AND SETTLEMENTS. Parties Voluntarily Dismissed Appeals of Federal CourtDecision Requiring More Climate Change Analysis for Wyoming Oil and Gas Leases. West Virginia v. 20-1530 (U.S. 20-1531 (U.S. Haaland , Nos.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content