This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The XXIInd volume of the Yearbook of Private International Law (2020/2021) has been released. The most recent innovations on classical themes of private international law (torts, muslim divorces, the degree of deference by state courts to international commercial arbitral awards, etc.) add to this already rich volume.
While Indonesian Private International Law does not explicitly address the law applicable to torts, the prevailing doctrine is lex loci delicti commissi (the law of the place where the tort was committed). However, Indonesian judges often apply lex fori (the law of the forum) to protect Indonesian citizens.
The Journal includes the following: › Women, Marriage, and Divorce in California, 1849–1872 by Bonnie L. The latest edition of California Legal History, the Journal of the California Supreme Court Historical Society , is out and available here. Disclosure: I’m on the Society’s board of directors.].
July 16, 2021), plaintiff and defendant were brother and sister. When defendant and his wife were later divorcing in 2019, the annuity came to light, and the wife informed plaintiff that she had seen a check that appeared to have been endorsed by someone else on her behalf. In Pomeroy v. McGinnis , No. E2020-00960-COA-R3-CV (Tenn.
4, 2021), plaintiff filed a fraud claim against defendant attorney who had represented him for a portion of plaintiff’s previous divorce case. In Vazeen v. M2019-01395-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Plaintiff asserted that defendant had engaged in fraudulent billing and that defendant had “charged a higher hourly rate than agreed.”
Social media prompts: Create a list of 10 LinkedIn post ideas for a mass tort firm that specializes in Brainstorm 20 post ideas for our CEO’s personal LinkedIn page to position them as a thought leader on California divorce law Create a LinkedIn post on how my business law firm is accepting new clients 5.
In particular, it examines the recognition of ancillary judgments in divorce cases, concluding that they fall under article 118 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The decision is the first to recognize a corporate duty to mitigate climate change under tort law.
Litigation : This may include a range of both civil and criminal litigation cases, such as personal injury tort claims, divorce and family law cases, contract disputes, and so on. . According to our 2021 Industry Report, 38% of those surveyed said they saved at least 6 hours a month by using software with invoicing features. .
At the same time, the dispute also raises broader questions about whether and when it is appropriate to resolve mass tort cases – that is, lawsuits brought by a group of people who have been harmed in a similar way, such as in a plane crash or by a defective product – through the bankruptcy system. And in Sept.
Eichel: Choice of Court Agreements and Rules of Interpretation in the Context of Tort or Anti-trust Claims. 1 Lugano Convention 2007 vis-à-vis claims in tort. However, with regard to torts and antitrust claims there are rules of interpretation arising from Art. 1 Brussels Ia Regulation/Art. 25 Brussels Ia Regulation itself.
The principal focus will be on questions of jurisdiction, the recognition and enforcement of judgments and choice of law for contract and tort. When children are born out of wedlock, but within close temporal relation to a divorce, the competing connecting factors provided for in Art. 20 EGBGB.
Haselbeck : Divorce without the involvement of a court in Member States of the EU and the Brussels IIbis- and the Rome III-Regulation. In recent years some Member States of the European Union such as Italy, Spain, France, and Greece introduced the possibility of a divorce without the involvement of a court. Sonnentag/J.
The third issue of 2021 of the Dutch journal on private international law (NIPR) is available. This article analyses the changes in the framework for international jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in cross-border civil and commercial matters between the Netherlands and the UK after 1 January 2021.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content