This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
We were curious as to the status of online court help to the self-represented litigants as a good 2021 year-end wrapup article for the CTB? For reference, an earlier list was compiled by the legaltechdesign.com website in 2018 and posted at: [link] The following list was compiled December 13-15, 2021. We share what we found below.
Whether law firms are filing into well-established eFiling courts or joining a court that is transitioning to eFiling for the first time, there are a variety of issues that can come up with documents that may cause them to be rejected. . Details on the document OR in the eFiling workflow are incorrect .
San Diego announces eFiling mandate, Madera County reveals strategic plan, and Riverside moves to remote civil trials. The post March 19, 2021: Weekly court update appeared first on One Legal.
Marin County brings back jury trials, San Diego and Placer Counties mandate eFiling, and Orange County changes electronic evidence submission process. The post March 26, 2021: Weekly court update appeared first on One Legal.
This week: Alameda modifies phone hours to speed up case processing, Mendocino prepares for eFiling, and some courts announce February 12th closure. The post February 5, 2021: Weekly court update appeared first on One Legal.
The release of their native-cloud product in March 2021, ALN Cloud, has further defined them as a true leader in legal tech. With the acquisition of ALN, Aderant further expands our footprint in our practice of law solutions with the addition of eDockets, Forms WorkFlow, Smart Dockets, Docket Alerts and eFiling Portal.”
The release of their native-cloud product in March 2021, ALN Cloud, has further defined them as a true leader in legal tech. With the acquisition of ALN, Aderant further expands our footprint in our practice of law solutions with the addition of eDockets, Forms WorkFlow, Smart Dockets, Docket Alerts and eFiling Portal.”
2024 Legal Industry Trends Report ) 91% of law firms had the ability to eFile in 2023. 2024 Legal Industry Trends Report ) 34% of law firms who used eFilling in 2023 saved 1-2 hours each week, 27% saved 3-5 hours, and 26% saved 5+ hours. 55% of lawyers in 2021 say that their workplace supports their mental health needs.
The agency is continuing to collect data from the 30 importers participating in the eFiling beta pilot. They expect an eFiling rulemaking to be finalized by the end of 2024 with full implementation in 2025. U.S. billion in 2021 and $1.2 Report highlights: U.S. imports under the CBI tariff preferences increased to $1.9
In particular, Lawson cites, “downloading forms from databases, saving Word documents as efile-ready PDFs, or inserting a section symbol can slow their progress even while large firms are deploying artificial intelligence to streamline ediscovery workflows.” Prieto, What’s New with the NextGen Bar Exam?
Within one day of being retained to assist with penalties assessed in 2021, Diaz Trade Law was able to effectively communicate with CBP and get CBP to rescind a demand letter and instead provide the requested mitigation, lowering the penalty amounts from $28,388 to $1,000, an unprecedented result! CBP mitigated apenalty from $44,145.34
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content