Conflict of Laws

DECEMBER 7, 2021

Update of 7 December 2021: New entries are printed bold. Appraisal of the Success of the Instruments of International Commercial Arbitration vs. Litigation and Mediation in the Harmonization of the Rules of Transnational Commercial Dispute Settlement”, preprint (DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-953987/v1 Explanatory Reports. rs-953987/v1 ).

Drafting 52

Drafting Laws Litigation Litigating 52

Conflict of Laws

AUGUST 31, 2022

Indirekta behörighetsregler och svensk domsrätt – Analys och utredning av svensk domstols behörighet i förhållande till 2019 års Haagkonvention om erkännande och verkställighet” (Examensarbete inom juristprogrammet, avancerad nivå, Örebro Universitet, 2021 ; available here ). University of Pittsburgh Law Review 82 (2021), pp.

Drafting 40

Drafting Laws Litigation Litigating 40

Conflict of Laws

NOVEMBER 23, 2021

Update of 20 November 2021: New entries are printed bold. Appraisal of the Success of the Instruments of International Commercial Arbitration vs. Litigation and Mediation in the Harmonization of the Rules of Transnational Commercial Dispute Settlement”, preprint (DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-953987/v1 Explanatory Reports. rs-953987/v1 ).

Drafting 52

Drafting Laws Litigation Litigating 52

Conflict of Laws

SEPTEMBER 28, 2022

Indirekta behörighetsregler och svensk domsrätt – Analys och utredning av svensk domstols behörighet i förhållande till 2019 års Haagkonvention om erkännande och verkställighet” (Examensarbete inom juristprogrammet, avancerad nivå, Örebro Universitet, 2021 ; available here ). University of Pittsburgh Law Review 82 (2021), pp.

Drafting 40

Drafting Laws Litigation Litigating 40

Conflict of Laws

JUNE 21, 2022

Indirekta behörighetsregler och svensk domsrätt – Analys och utredning av svensk domstols behörighet i förhållande till 2019 års Haagkonvention om erkännande och verkställighet” (Examensarbete inom juristprogrammet, avancerad nivå, Örebro Universitet, 2021 ; available here ). University of Pittsburgh Law Review 82 (2021), pp.

Drafting 40

Drafting Laws Litigation Litigating 40

FDA Law Blog

APRIL 23, 2021

22, 2021) [hereinafter Slip Op.], It did that by focusing on the text of the statute. Indeed, the first (and very succinct) point in the Court’s analysis of the statute is that “the language [of §13(b)] refers only to injunctions.” Id. Gibbs & John R. Fleder & Michael S. Heesters —. Federal Trade Commission, No.

Court 40

Court Statute Punitive Damages Government 40

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

DECEMBER 11, 2020

Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. On November 23, GM announced that it was withdrawing from the litigation. By Margaret Barry and Korey Silverman-Roati.

Court 54

Court Government Litigation Litigating 54

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

OCTOBER 20, 2020

Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. 1442, or the civil-rights removal statute, 28 U.S.C. The NHTSA regulations would have taken effect in January 2021.

Court 72

Court Government Compensatory Damages Litigation 72

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

NOVEMBER 16, 2020

Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. HERE ARE RECENT ADDITIONS TO THE INTERNATIONAL CLIMATE LITIGATION CHART. By Margaret Barry and Korey Silverman-Roati. filed Sept.

Cause of Action 96

Cause of Action Court Government Litigation 96

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

MAY 7, 2021

Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. Circuit majority opinion’s interpretation was foreclosed by the statute and violated separation of powers. and non-U.S.

Court 40

Court Government Construction Litigation 40

JonathanTurley

MARCH 31, 2021

The officers seek $75,000 in damages in their complaint but also ask for unspecified punitive damages. The second “Count Five” is actually just a demand for punitive damages, rather than an actual separate tort. COUNT FOUR (Violation of a Public Safety Statute: D.C.

Punitive Damages 49

Punitive Damages Tort Statute Court 49