2021 Punitive Damages Statute 
Conflict of Laws
MARCH 23, 2024
by Salih Okur (University of Augsburg) On 8 and 9 March, scholars from more than a dozen different jurisdictions followed the invitation of Tobias Lutzi to discuss recent trends in punitive damages at the University of Augsburg, Germany. The conference contained five panels overall, which were split into three blocks.
At the Lectern
SEPTEMBER 23, 2021
The opinion reversed an award, including $2,500,000 in punitive damages, against an insurance company regarding the sale of the company’s annuity, because, the appellate court concluded, the person who sold the annuity was not the company’s agent. Lewis (2021) 11 Cal.5th County of San Mateo (2006) 139 Cal.App.4th
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
At the Lectern
DECEMBER 2, 2021
Superior Court , where review was granted in September to decide if Government Code section 818 , which bars punitive damages against government defendants, precludes recovery under Code of Civil Procedure section 340.1 , subdivision (b), which permits an award of up to treble damages after a child is sexually abused as a result of a cover up.
JayS.Rothman&Associates
MAY 1, 2022
as well as general damages for any mental anguish, emotional distress, or other pain and suffering. In addition, punitive damages are available if the additional elements of Cal. Remedies for sexual harassment can include compensation for any economic harm (e.g., lost income, medical expenses, therapy expenses, etc.),
Constitutional Law Reporter
SEPTEMBER 15, 2021
S. _ (2021), the U.S. By a vote of 5-4, the justices held that only a plaintiff concretely harmed by a defendant’s violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) has Article III standing to seek damages against that private defendant in federal court. In TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez , 594 U. Supreme Court’s Decision. Robins, 578 U.S.
FDA Law Blog
APRIL 23, 2021
22, 2021) [hereinafter Slip Op.], It did that by focusing on the text of the statute. Indeed, the first (and very succinct) point in the Court’s analysis of the statute is that “the language [of §13(b)] refers only to injunctions.” Id. Gibbs & John R. Fleder & Michael S. Heesters —. Federal Trade Commission, No.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
DECEMBER 11, 2020
Supreme Court scheduled oral argument for January 19, 2021 in fossil fuel companies’ appeal of a Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals decision affirming an order remanding to state court the City of Baltimore’s climate change case against the companies. the court continued the case management conference scheduled for December 16 to June 9, 2021.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
59 
Let's personalize your content