This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In Japan, climate litigation ( / Kiko soshou ) has been used to challenge the legality of the construction and operation of the coal-fired power plants and promote coal phase-out. Subsequently, two administrative cases were filed, one in Kobe in 2018 ( Citizens Committee on the Kobe Coal-Fired Power Plant v. Sendai Power Station ).
The Supreme Court of Japan may soon weigh in on a growing field of climate litigation in Japan against coal-fired power plants. On May 6, 2022, the Citizens’ Committee on the Kobe Coal-Fired Power Plant filed an appeal to Japan’s Supreme Court in Citizens’ Committee on the Kobe Coal-Fired Power Plant v. Civil law cases.
Credit: Tobias Reich, Unsplash The Sabin Center’s Global Climate Change Litigation Database currently lists over 2000 cases. And what do they say about the future of climate litigation in the country? The country also has a strong tradition of public interest litigation , with roots in the anti-apartheid struggle.
These stations have until May 5, 2022 to prepare and upload their responses to their online public files. See our post on the Broadcast Law Blog for more information, and read the audit letter setting out all the requirements for the audit response and the list of audited stations, here.
The fourth issue of 2022 of the Rivista di diritto internazionale privato e processuale (RDIPP, published by CEDAM) was just released. In order to limit the forum shopping potential of the present rules on jurisdiction and applicable law in defamation cases, an intervention by the EU legislature should be envisaged. XXXII-329.
New York maintains that the terms of the compact provide that only Congress can repeal it and that, insofar as the compact represents a federal statute, its breach violates federal law. In earlier litigation, the Waterfront Commission sued the New Jersey governor to prevent him from enforcing the law. However, the U.S.
Menell, Koret Professor of Law; Director, Berkeley Center for Law & Technology; Faculty Director, Berkeley Judicial Institute; University of California at Berkeley School of Law. Prior to the mid-1990s, patent litigation took place in district court silos. They saw advantages to trying patent cases to juries.
In her recent response , Chairwoman Rosenworcel stated that the FCC’s ability to share the requested information was limited because the matter was subject to pending litigation, and because the proposed transaction remains active at the FCC.
According to the Press Release announcing his appointment, David Shaw will fill that position after having previously served as an administrativelaw judge on the International Trade Commission for over 10 years. A new Chief Copyright Royalty Judge of the Copyright Royalty Board has just been named by the Librarian of Congress.
Two of the cases involve whether litigants must wait for administrative proceedings to conclude before challenging the authority of federal agencies in federal court. The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in five cases last week. Axon Enterprise, Inc.
In April 2023, the Council of State, the highest court on administrativelaw matters, affirmed the decision. Despite a strong climate change legal framework, the lack of implementation of statutes and case law is a prevalent and persistent issue in Colombia. In February 2023, the Tribunal of Cundinamarca decided the case.
2022-1212 (Fed. The Section 15 declaration falsely stated no proceedings involving the DANTANNA’S mark were pending, when in fact the cancellation proceeding and related litigation were still ongoing. The philosophical divide between textual fidelity and policy concerns is a recurring tension in administrativelaw.
At this Friday’s conference, the Supreme Court will thus begin the process of considering what cases to review next fall during October Term 2022. Last week’s relists yielded what will likely be the last five cases to be to be argued during the current term. The company faced a series of demands from the FTC it viewed as unreasonable.
In the course of the litigation, Abdelhady asked the court to ignore her election (and receipt) of workers’ compensation benefits and find that the WCA does not apply after all. Abdelhady had a drawn out litigation under WCA to force payments from the university. Id That claim failed and the D.C. See Abdelhady v. 3d 896 (D.C.
The Securities and Exchange Commission regulations on climate disclosure, first proposed in March 2022 and likely to be issued in final form in October 2023, [1] have drawn considerable controversy and face an uncertain fate in the inevitable litigation. [2] Victor, Fixing the Climate: Strategies for an Uncertain World (2022).
Share The Supreme Court on Monday added two new cases , both involving the jurisdiction of federal district courts, to the merits docket for the 2022-23 term. An administrativelaw judge agreed that Cochran had violated federal law, fined her over $20,000, and banned her from practicing before the SEC for five years.
Not only did these directors make sweeping policy changes for the nation but, in 2022 alone, they awarded more than $25 billion in federal biomedical grants. In one case involving challenged administrativelaw judges in 2018, the Supreme Court ruled in Lucia v. The problem is the 21st Century Cures Act , passed in 2016.
Hausman is a former immigrants’ rights attorney and a postdoctoral fellow at Stanford University, who studies administrativelaw and immigration enforcement. The 2022 forthcoming paper can be accessed here.
In an article published in 2014, law professor Thomas Merrill suggested that the Chevron decision was not regarded as a particularly consequential one when it was issued. But in the decades since then, it became one of the most significant rulings on federal administrativelaw, cited by federal courts more than 18,000 times.
Major decisions on abortion and gun rights are expected by June 2022. That’s what 2022 is likely to be. The court tends to be more conservative in the selection of cases before major elections, but 2022 will put the court at ground zero in one of the most heated elections in history. It recently added to that list.
In 2021 the Biden Administration reversed the Trump-era rollbacks and instituted the strictest-ever vehicle GHG emissions standards in a move aimed at preventing 3.1 In 2022, Texas, along with several other states and industry groups representing fuel manufacturers (together, Petitioners), challenged EPA’s new emissions standards in court.
Biden appointed the most judges to the Second Circuit in 2021, to the Ninth in 2022, and even had one judge begin active service in 2025 ( Embry Kidd in the Eleventh Circuit). This reflects a pragmatic and arguably conservative judicial approach to patent law, consistent with modern trends in 101 jurisprudence. #2 2 Gociman v.
” She also pressed counsel to distinguish between different types of harms and resources diverted by organizations in a way that might affect their standing in litigation. As the Court weighs these decisions, their approaches could shape not only the outcomes of these cases but the broader trajectory of constitutional law.
I want you to read about the two cases of the day and tell me what you think about how courts are doing with law and equity. 2022) and Boston Police Superior Officers Association v. Both cases involved requests for emergency relief, seeking to stay or enjoin the vaccine mandates while the litigation is pending.
The Scramble to Identify Major Questions in AdministrativeLaw In its June 2022 decision in West Virginia v. The challenge of meeting changing conditions in administrativelaw is known as the pacing problem: scientific and technological developments will nearly always outstrip the pace of government oversight.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content