Patently O

DECEMBER 11, 2022

Apple’s attorneys were able to convince the judge that the license to Fortress meant that Uniloc no longer held full rights to the patent and thus lacked standing to sue. Uniloc USA, Inc. Motorola Mobility LLC , 52 F.4th 4th 1340 (Fed. Even though the original lower court decision violated precedent, it still binds the parties.

Stare Decisis 131

Stare Decisis Court Decisions Litigation Litigating 131

Patently O

JULY 2, 2024

In the past, both the USPTO and patent attorneys have largely ignored the larger scope of administrative law, but in recent years USPTO operations have been under tighter control from the White House, and courts have increasingly asked whether the agency is following the rules. to dictate the outcome of cases.” Vidal (Fed. ”

Stare Decisis 49

Stare Decisis Statute Construction Administrative Law 49

Fordham Law News

JANUARY 5, 2024

13] The Court defended the exemption largely on the grounds of stare decisis and congressional acquiescence, tasking Congress with changing the long-standing law if they felt the need. [14] 2022) aff’d, No. 29] Settlement On November 2, 2023, James W. 1 (West). [7] Antitrust Division, U.S. 3d 45, 52 (S.D.N.Y. Needle, Inc.

Sports 52

Sports Stare Decisis Laws Court 52

Patently O

JULY 6, 2022

USPTO (Supreme Court 2022) focuses the question of whether COURTS have power to create non-statutory patentability doctrines. Steve Gass has a PhD in physics and also a patent attorney. And, in any case, these exceptions have defined the reach of the statute as a matter of statutory stare decisis going back 150 years.

Stare Decisis 75

Stare Decisis Statute Court Construction 75

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 7, 2022

After granting four petitions for review on Friday afternoon, the court – as expected – did not add any new cases to its docket for the 2022-23 term. At his trial, prosecutors called the assistant district attorney who had handled the case at the grand jury to the stand, where he testified at length. Buffington v.

Stare Decisis 98

Stare Decisis Court Rules Court Government 98

JURIST

DECEMBER 19, 2024

The Georiga Court of Appeals removed Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis from the election interference case against President-elect Donald Trump and 18 others over Willis’s previously undisclosed relationship with special prosecutor Nathan Wade. ” Willis hired Wade to lead the Trump prosecution in November 2021.

Stare Decisis 211

Stare Decisis Court Attorney 211