This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Very recently, Indonesian private international law has attracted significant scholarship in the English language. [1] 1] Dr Penasthika’s monograph (‘the monograph’) [2] is one such work that deserves attention for its compelling and comprehensive account of choice of law in international commercial contracts in Indonesia.
The following comment has been kindly provided by Sarah Ott, a doctoral student and research assistant at the University of Freiburg (Germany), Institute for Comparative and Private International Law, Dept. A central question of the dispute was the law applicable to the contract.
Like most of the civillaw codifications in the region, the new law focuses mainly on the so-called “patrimonial law,” i.e., property rights and obligations (contractual and non-contractual). M/73 of 9 March 2022, entered into force on June 18, 2022).
The SC invited Contracting States, which have not done so already, to consider designating, in accordance with the Emerging Guidance regarding the Development of the IHNJ, one or more members of the judiciary for the purpose of direct judicial communications within the context of the IHNJ. It is submitted the following: 55.
The third issue of the Journal of Private International Law for 2023 has just been published. As such, it contributes to an understanding of implied jurisdiction agreements, providing valuable insights into their practical implications for international commercial contracts.
Introduction In a previous post , I reported and commented on a decision rendered by the Abu Dhabi Supreme Court (hereinafter “ADSC”) in which the Court addressed the issue of the applicability of the Abu Dhabi Civil Marriage Law (Law No. 8/2022 of 1 February 2022) to foreign Muslims. In that case ( Appeal No.
Melnick Annual Symposium sponsored by the Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (2014), the Conference at the University of Trento (11 November 2022) once again evokes the image of mediation as a ‘sleeping beauty’ awaiting her Prince Charming. 149 del 2022 ( A Proposal from the Civil Justice Observers on the Italian Reform of Civil Justice.
Despite the absence of an open provision for TPF, the amendments in the “Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1999” and the “Specific Relief Act, 1963” which have ensured that the performance of a contract is mandatory, boost the confidence of the funders and make it prone to increased cases of funding. CONFIDENTIALITY. 12] Union of India v.
Saada (20-1034) will take place tomorrow (Tuesday 22 March 2022) at 10 am Washington DC time before the US Supreme Court. Written by Mayela Celis, UNED. The oral arguments of the case Golan v. For the argument transcripts and audio, click here. The live audio will be available here. We have previously reported on this case here and here.
On 7 June 2022, the Supreme Court of New South Wales recognized and enforced two Chinese judicial mediation settlement issued by the People’s Court of Qingdao, Shandong Province China in Bank of China Limited v Chen. The common law and civillaw view the notion of judicial power differently.
The legal scholarly discussion of the last decade has brought to the establishment of various models in the fields of contractlaw, property law, company law, securities law etc. Thus, various legal problems in these fields of law could be solved.
Paragraph 1 of Article 276 lists six jurisdiction grounds, including the place of contract formation, place of contract performance, place of the subject matter, place of distrainable property, place of tort, and place of representative offices. in Supreme People’s Court Gazette, Issue 2, 2022 (Total No. Sharp Corporation.,
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
52 
Let's personalize your content