This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for International, European and Regulatory ProceduralLaw is currently recruiting. A fully-funded position as Research Fellow (PhD candidate) for the Department of European and Comparative ProceduralLaw, led by Prof.
Background China’s Civil ProcedureLaw was enacted in April 1991 by the Fourth Session of the Seventh National People’s Congress. The latest amendments to the Civil ProcedureLaw in 2023, referred to as the new CPL, involve 26 amendments, including 14 modified articles and 15 new additions.
Choice of Law Most Chinese courts tend to apply lex fori on the effectiveness of asymmetric choice of court agreements. However, in 2022, the Supreme Peoples Court of PRC (hereinafter referred to as SPC) issued Summary of National Symposium on Foreign-Related Commercial and Maritime Trials of Courts (hereinafter referred to as the Summary).
Very recently, Indonesian private international law has attracted significant scholarship in the English language. [1] 1] Dr Penasthika’s monograph (‘the monograph’) [2] is one such work that deserves attention for its compelling and comprehensive account of choice of law in international commercial contracts in Indonesia.
In the judgment in Owens Bank, C-129/92 , the Court of Justice held that the Brussels Convention does not apply to proceedings in a Contracting State concerning the enforcement of judgment given in civil and commercial matters in non-contracting State. Court’s answer and its findings.
The revision of this regulation, which will enter into force on 1 July 2022, provides an opportunity to examine the current and future rules by taking the example of the international service of writs of summons. It points out that the Regulation Rome I covers only obligations that would not exist without the contract.
On 15 July 2022, the Supreme Court of New South Wales (“NSW”) recognized and enforced a Chinese judgment issued by the Shanghai Pudong New Area People’s Court 12 years ago in Tianjin Yingtong Materials Co Ltd v Young [2022] NSWSC 943. [1] Written by Zilin Hao*. 1] It ruled that the defendant Katherine Young (“Ms.
The second issue of 2022 of Giustizia Consensuale (published by Editoriale Scientifica) has just been released, and it features: Ferruccio Auletta and Alberto Massera , Giustizia consensuale e p.a.: Observatory on Legislation and Regulations Mauro Bove, I verbali che concludono la mediazione nel d.lgs.
It is also notable that, as concluded after examining the data kindly brought to our attention by the Thessaloniki Court of First Instance Department of Publications, out of one hundred court judgments related to international law issued in the year 2022 by the above mentioned Court, approximately 70% of them concerned family disputes in a broader (..)
Schlosser: Jurisdiction Agreements and other Agreements integrally Covered by European Law. Certain contracts are particularly close to the law of the European Union. That law is particularly concerned about its effectiveness, if needed by a creative approach.
Magnus: A new Private International Law and new Procedural Rules for Adoptions in Germany. As a result of two recent reforms the German private international and procedurallaws applicable to adoptions have changed quite substantively. The following article presents the German implementing rules for this recast.
The third issue for the Journal of Private International Law for 2022 was published today. A Kusumadara, “Jurisdiction of Courts Chosen in the Parties’ Choice of Court Agreements: An Unsettled Issue in Indonesian Private International Law and the way-out”. Review Article.
The second issue of 2022 of the Rivista di diritto internazionale privato e processuale (RDIPP, published by CEDAM) was just released. Mariottini , Senior Research Fellow at the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for ProceduralLaw: Henry Deeb GABRIEL, Contracts for the Sale of Goods – A Comparison of U.S.
Issue 2/2022 of RabelsZ has just been published. It contains the following contributions: Ralf Michaels: Peter Mankowski *11.10.1966 †10.2.2022, Volume 86 (2022) / Issue 2, pp. 323–326, DOI: 10.1628/rabelsz-2022-0028. 327–363, DOI: 10.1628/rabelsz-2022-0029. 327–363, DOI: 10.1628/rabelsz-2022-0029.
We would like to explore these and many other related questions at the 4th German-speaking Conference for Young Scholars in Private International Law. The call for papers will be released in spring 2022 and we expect the submission of abstracts until late summer 2022.
Samtleben: Paraguay: Choice of Law in international contracts. To date, Paraguay is the only country to have implemented into its national law the Hague Principles on Choice of Law in International Commercial Contracts. Unlike the Principles, however, Law No.
The author criticizes that the ECJ characterizes the contract to enter into a future contract detached from the future contract and generally argues in favor of an ancillary characterization and a broad understanding of the provision of services for the purpose of Art. 7(1)(b) Brussels Ia-Regulation.
Hau: Interim relief against contracting authorities: classification as a civil and commercial matter, coordination of parallel proceedings and procedural autonomy of the Member States. Choice of court agreements are one of the most important instruments of international civil procedurelaw.
According to the doctrine of privity of contract, only parties to a choice of court agreement are subject to the rights and obligations arising from it. Effectively, this is a context specific harmonised approach to developing substantive contractlaw rules to regulate the effectiveness of choice of court agreements.
Nitschmann: The consequences of Brexit on Civil Judicial Cooperation between Germany and the United Kingdom The United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union has far-reaching consequences for international civil procedurelaw. 57 Austrian Code of Civil Procedure. 5 Brussels Ia Regulation and Art. A reshaping of Art.
Orient Thai Airlines”), a Thai company, entered into an airline ticket sales contract based on their long-term cooperation in charter flights. The contract was signed in Nanning and stipulated that disputes would be settled by the court where the Orient Thai Airlines was located.
Coester-Waltjen: Non-Recognition of “Child Marriages“ Concluded Abroad and Constitutional Standards The Federal Supreme Court raised the question on the constitutionality of one provision of the new law concerning “child marriages” enacted by the German legislator in 2017. 13 ss 3 no 1 EGBGB).
April 2022, both unreported). The second decision concerned two accredited sports managers from Argentina against an Argentinian football player who terminated unilaterally the agreement, hence, he failed to abide by the conditions of the contract signed with the managers. Piraeus Court of first instance, decision published on 28.
Written by NIE Yuxin and LIU Chang, Wuhan University Institute of International Law. The present Civil ProcedureLaw of China (hereinafter “CPL”) was enacted in 1990 and has been amended four times. All amendments made no substantive adjustments to the foreign-related civil procedure proceedings. Background. Jurisdiction.
Such a court decision can be recognised in Germany under procedurallaw. had to deal with the extraterritorial effect of so-called US secondary sanctions on contracts to which German law is applicable. (OLG OLG Frankfurt a.M.) OLG Frankfurt a.M.) 9(3) Rome I Regulation.
On 7 June 2022, the Supreme Court of New South Wales recognized and enforced two Chinese judicial mediation settlement issued by the People’s Court of Qingdao, Shandong Province China in Bank of China Limited v Chen. This document is called ‘judicial mediation settlement’ in this note. What is a judicial mediation settlement.
On 10 June 2022, the University of Trento, Faculty of Law celebrated the first anniversary of the launch of Giustizia consensuale , founded and edited by Professor Silvana Dalla Bontà and Professor Paola Lucarelli. He stated that there are three points of interaction between agreement and procedure.
On 9 September 2022, the Max Planck Institute for ProceduralLaw Luxembourg hosted a conference on the Brussels Ibis Reform, in collaboration with the KU Leuven and the EAPIL. 1 in light of the principle of privity of contracts (“Relativität des Schuldverhältnisses”) and the concurrence of claims under Article 7 no.
The EU Commission published a long awaited Proposal for a Directive on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence (CSDDD), COM(2022) 71 final, on 23 February 2022; the EU Council adopted its negotiation position on 1 December 2022; and now, the EU Parliament has suggested amendments to this Draft Directive on 1 June 2023.
A/S the CJEU iterates on the principle expressed in Recital 18 Brussels I bis Regulation that in cross-border insurance contracts only the weaker party should be protected by rules of jurisdiction more favourable to his interests than the general rules. April 2022, 596 U.S. _ (2022) – Cassirer et al./. In its decision T.B.
Convention, the FSIL deals separately with employment contracts (Article 8) and intellectual property cases (Article 11). The FSIL’s reciprocity clause is consistent with the emphasis on reciprocity that one finds in other provisions of Chinese law. Like the U.N. Article 7’s reference to both “nature and purpose” is significant.
Written by Jidong Lin, Wuhan University Institute of International Law Background China’s newly amended Civil ProcedureLaw (“CPL 2024”), which came into effect on 1 January 2024, introduces several distinct and innovative changes. npc/c2/c30834/202112/t20211227_315637.html> html> accessed 13 October 2024. [2]
Contract and Process for the Joint Appointment of an Expert Pursuant to Art. 473 bis (26)of the Italian Code of Civil Procedure ; in Italian). 150/2022 d.lgs. Their regulatory discipline is converging in parallel with the technological convergence among the various sectors of the digital ecosystem.
Biden appointed the most judges to the Second Circuit in 2021, to the Ninth in 2022, and even had one judge begin active service in 2025 ( Embry Kidd in the Eleventh Circuit). This reflects a pragmatic and arguably conservative judicial approach to patent law, consistent with modern trends in 101 jurisprudence. #2 2 Gociman v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content