This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
65, 2022) of the Japanese Yearbook of International Law – published by the International Law Association of Japan – has been recently released. It features the following articles, case notes as well as English translation of some relevant courtdecisions relating to private international law.
The revision of this regulation, which will enter into force on 1 July 2022, provides an opportunity to examine the current and future rules by taking the example of the international service of writs of summons. The Cologne courtdecision combined several precedents of the German Federal Court and the European Court of Justice.
This is evidenced by the US Supreme Court2022 judgment Golan v. Department of State Attorney-Advisor for Children’s Issues as well as a USAID Regional Legal Advisor/Senior Advisor for Children/Youth in Conflict, Anna has transitioned to practicing international familylaw with a focus on child rights cases and issues.
This is evidenced by the US Supreme Court2022 judgment Golan v. Department of State Attorney-Advisor for Children’s Issues as well as a USAID Regional Legal Advisor/Senior Advisor for Children/Youth in Conflict, Anna has transitioned to practicing international familylaw with a focus on child rights cases and issues.
Hau: International jurisdiction based on nationality in European familylaw. The author analyses, among other things, courtdecisions in which the distinction between constitutive religious marriage and civil documentation of marriage in Lebanon plays a central role. Kronke: Ulrich Drobnig (1928–2022).
592/2023 ), the DSC dismissed the appeal by reasoning as follows: First, the DSC recalled the legal framework for the enforcement of foreign judgments, citing almost verbatim Article 222 of the new Federal Civil Procedure Act of 2022 (the English translation can be found here ). 356/2022 of 7 December 2022 ). 37 (2023), pp.
The article argues that the regulation is overall a helpful and welcome addition to international familylaw because it strengthens the welfare of the child and enhances the practical functionality and normative structure of its predecessor. Nevertheless, scope for further improvements in another recast regulation is identified.
Introduction In a previous post , I reported and commented on a decision rendered by the Abu Dhabi Supreme Court (hereinafter “ADSC”) in which the Court addressed the issue of the applicability of the Abu Dhabi Civil Marriage Law (Law No. 8/2022 of 1 February 2022) to foreign Muslims.
Schütze: Security for costs of english plaintiffs in Austrian litigation The judgment of the Austrian Supreme Court (Oberster Gerichtshof – OGH) of 29 March 2022 deals with the obligation of English plaintiffs to provide security for costs according to sect. 57 Austrian Code of Civil Procedure. The principle stated in para.
Concluding Remarks This is not the only case in which challenges to choice-of-court agreements in favor of a foreign court are framed in terms of forum non conveniens in Bahrain (see e.g., the Bahrain Chamber of Dispute Resolution, Case No. 09/2022 of 17 October 2022 ). Would it operate in familylaw disputes, etc.?
On 7 December 2022, the European Commission adopted a Proposal for a Regulation which aims to harmonize at the EU level the rules of private international law with regard to parenthood. This proposal aims to provide legal certainty and predictability for families in cross-border situations. What is next?
Legal Battle a) In Japan On 28 January 2021, Y initiated legal proceedings against X in the Tokyo FamilyCourt, seeking custody of the children and an order to hand over the two daughters. On 31 May 2021, the Tokyo FamilyCourt issued a decree in favor of Y ( Hanrei Taimuzu , No. 1496 (2022) p. 2519 (2022) p.60).
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content