This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Supreme Court’s October 2022 term ended just a couple of months ago, but it’s already apparent that the decisions are leading to a great deal of litigation. What are the major issues left open by the cases that are likely to be litigated in state and federal courts?
Rather, any new grant this term will very likely be pushed back to the October 2022 Term for hearing and decision. Still, there are a number of important patent cases pending before the court. 21-746 (CVSG requested February 22, 2022). 2022)(forthcoming). Lets talk them through. Daktronics, Inc., 35 U.S.C. §
The district court had granted Milieudefensies claims for a reduction target of 45% by 2030, leading to Shells appeal in 2022. The appellate court followed the district court’s decision to a large extent, but also deviated from it on crucial points. Three Takeaways from the Decision 1.
Litigants shouldn’t get to choose the judge who decides their case. Judge shopping, we’ve argued elsewhere , raises concerns about court bias and capture and can make litigation unnecessarily costly and inefficient. Google also won its only petition in 2022, bumping its grant rate up even higher, to 71.4%. of the time.
This means that issues decided at the district or administrative court level can be binding on all other courts: district courts, administrative courts, appellate courts, and even the Supreme Court. District courtdecisions are not binding precedent because they are at the bottom.
This blog post discusses the case and its implications for future climate litigation and policy in Czechia. First Dismissal by the Supreme Administrative Court In February 2023, the Supreme Administrative Court of the Czech Republic overturned the Prague Municipal Courtsdecision and returned the case for further proceedings.
Circuit’s July 2022 ruling in National Association of Broadcasters v. FCC , which rejected the requirement that broadcast licensees independently check two federal databases to verify whether an airtime lessee is a “foreign governmental entity” (see our Broadcast Law Blog article on the Court’sdecision here ).
The first week of July 2022 brought on several major developments in climate litigation in the Netherlands, with possibly significant ramifications for a new type of global climate litigation. This “splash” of misleading advertisement cases (rather than a “wave”) seems to be a fairly new phenomenon in climate litigation.
65, 2022) of the Japanese Yearbook of International Law – published by the International Law Association of Japan – has been recently released. It features the following articles, case notes as well as English translation of some relevant courtdecisions relating to private international law. The latest Volume (Vol.
This week, we highlight petitions that ask the court to consider, among other things, whether the 2nd Circuit’s decision in December granting the state an early-stage victory in the litigation ran afoul of the Second Amendment. But the court did not specify exactly what history courts must look to.
On 21 August 2022, China Justice Observer released the 2022 version of the List of China’s Cases on Recognition of Foreign Judgments. The full version of the 2022 List of China’s Cases on Recognition of Foreign Judgments is available here. Written by Dr. Meng Yu and Dr. Guodong Du, co-founders of China Justice Observer*.
.” It recently published a request for public comments on the idea of a small claims patent court. patent litigation deters small- and medium-sized enterprises, including. The remedies that a potential small claims patent court would be able to. The legal effect of decisions of a potential small claims patent court; and.
Since these Supreme Courtdecisions, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has applied this two-step test and issued a number of opinions as to whether a particular subject matter is patent-eligible. Explain how the current state of patent eligibility jurisprudence affects the conduct of business in your technology areas.
The revision of this regulation, which will enter into force on 1 July 2022, provides an opportunity to examine the current and future rules by taking the example of the international service of writs of summons. Predictability is the core ambition, not a particular outcome in litigation. van Calster: Lex ecologia. Budzikiewicz/B.
While previous versions of the dataset have been limited to merits decisions, this year we began including non-merits terminations as well. Currently, all non-merits terminations from 2022 are included in the dataset. We’ll be working backwards to add terminations from earlier years. But it is a drop from 2014-2020.
On March 15, 2022, the Full Federal Court of Australia, an intermediate appellate court, unanimously overturned the primary judge’s decision in Sharma and Others v. The decision has significant implications for future climate litigation claims in Australia. 2021 Federal CourtDecision .
Guest Commentary: An Unexpected Success for Czech Climate Litigation. On June 15, 2022, the Prague Municipal Court, a first instance administrative court, decided in favor of the plaintiffs in the first Czech strategic climate case ( Klimatická žaloba ?R 2022 Prague Municipal CourtDecision.
Facts of the Case The cases spring from more than two years of litigation, in which two separate groups of voters have challenged Louisianas congressional maps. In the first round of redistricting litigation, Robinson, et al v. In the first round of redistricting litigation, Robinson, et al v.
In other words, FDA needed to determine whether the initial biosimilar litigation—pre-interchangeable supplemental approval—counts towards the FIE expiration date calculation.
Accused infringers also prefer IPRs because they effectively bifurcate the trial between validity and infringement, with the IPR validity questions being decided first while infringement litigation is stayed. The result is that the IPRs are also a low risk option for accused infringers since no liability attaches from that decision.
The first issue of the Journal of Private International law for 2022 was released yesterday. The aim of this article is to explore the issue of how the proposed convention shall address conflicts of jurisdiction in international litigation.
Interestingly, the litigation was dismissed as the district judge was of the view it was for the U.S. On appeal, in a decision dated October 18, 2022, the Second Circuit concurred with the bulk of the lower court’s analysis but, in the absence of a statutory bar, reinstated that part of the case which sought injunctive relief.
The monograph predominantly examines 19 Indonesian courtdecisions on choice of law in international commercial contracts during the period, 2000-2020. This decision has since been followed by many Indonesian judges. 3] Judgment of the Supreme Court 1537K/PDT/1989, 21 January 1991. [4] 2] Penasthika (ibid). [3]
Quach is expected to decide whether California’s test for determining whether a party has waived its right to compel arbitration by engaging in litigation remains valid after the United States Supreme Courtdecision in Morgan v. 2022) _ U.S. _ [142 S.Ct. The court granted review in August 2022.
18, 2022 ). At times, a court can look to other relevant evidence, but only when the ANDA filing fails to “speak clearly and directly to the question of infringement.” ” Rather, the court assumes that the ANDA filer will “act in full compliance with its representations to the FDA.” Eagle Pharm.,
In July 2022, Indonesians at the frontline of climate change filed a claim before the National Human Rights Commission seeking recognition that climate change is a matter of human rights and calling on the Indonesian government to take stronger action. Millions of Indonesians cautiously await its decision. The human rights complaint.
Courts to obtain discovery in order to facilitate foreign litigation; with the pending global litigation between Eli Lilly and Novartis serving as our key example. The standard today is that prior to trial the litigating parties will share “mutual knowledge of all relevant facts.” ” Hickman v.
The 2020 update and 2022 update were also posted on Conflictoflaws.net. Please note that in In re DAR (2022) Jing 01 Po Shen No. 786), the Beijing First Intermediate People’s Court ruled to recognize a German court’s bankruptcy ruling based on the principle of reciprocity. 99 Trade Co. Ltd (2019) Jing 04 Xie Wai Ren No.3,
The 2020 update [2] , 2022 update [3] , and 2023 update [4] were also posted on Conflictoflaws.net. Case analyses have been aggregated under the country tags since 2022, so it is now easier to track down relevant cases, together with their information and analyses, in each country/region report.
In its 2022 Caltech decision, the Federal Circuit overturned its prior Shaw precedent and found that the estoppel broadly applies to all claims challenged in an IPR and all grounds “which reasonably could have been asserted” against the petitioned claims. 2022) (“Caltech”). 2022) (“Caltech”).
Even some judges on the Federal Circuit have labeled the eligibility framework as an “incoherent doctrine” [1] that might tempt district courts into “an effective coin toss,” [2] while others have openly confessed that “the nation’s lone patent court … [is] at a loss as to how to uniformly apply § 101.” [3]
Alex Mills, Sustainability and jurisdiction in the international civil litigation market The sustainability of the global economy, particularly in response to the concerns of climate change, is an issue which impacts many different aspects of life and work around the world.
California Commerce Club : Does California’s test for determining whether a party has waived its right to compel arbitration by engaging in litigation remain valid after the United States Supreme Courtdecision in Morgan v. 2022) _ U.S. _ [142 S.Ct. The court granted review in August 2022. Sundance, Inc.
For litigants embroiled in cross-border litigation, the anti-suit injunction has become a staple in the conflict of laws arsenal of common law courts. This was the scenario facing the New Zealand High Court in the recent case of Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley Family Trustee Limited [2022] NZHC 2881.
105 (2001), the Supreme Court recognized that §1 is limited to transportation workers. The Court revisited the scope of the residual clause in Southwest Airlines Co. 450 (2022). All this “complexity and uncertainty” would “‘breed[] litigation from a statute that seeks to avoid it.’” Adams , 532 U.S. Saxon , 596 U.S.
Supreme Court issued its first opinion of the 2022-2023 Term. S. _ (2023), a unanimous Court held that the effective date of an award of service-related disability compensation to a veteran of the United States military determined pursuant to 38 U.S.C. §§ 5110(a)(1) and 5110(b)(1) is not subject to equitable tolling.
Based on a litigation agreement pursuant to Sections 119b (2), 184a (3) of the German Courts Constitution Act on the first instance jurisdiction of the Commercial Court and on the conduct of proceedings in English, the article analyses details of the newly created procedural instruments and their implementation in practice.
Boule , 596 U.S. _ (2022), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the authority of a court to imply a cause of action under Bivens v. In Egbert v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. Border Patrol agent. Anderson v. Creighton , 483 U.S. 635 (1987).
The last of these cases was the first climate case in the form of administrative litigation. Thus, the court’s approach effectively means that no plaintiff will have standing in any climate change litigation. In July 2022, the United Nations declared the right to a clean, healthy sustainable environment.
Introduction In a previous post , I reported and commented on a decision rendered by the Abu Dhabi Supreme Court (hereinafter “ADSC”) in which the Court addressed the issue of the applicability of the Abu Dhabi Civil Marriage Law (Law No. 8/2022 of 1 February 2022) to foreign Muslims. In that case ( Appeal No.
Schütze: Security for costs of english plaintiffs in Austrian litigation The judgment of the Austrian Supreme Court (Oberster Gerichtshof – OGH) of 29 March 2022 deals with the obligation of English plaintiffs to provide security for costs according to sect. 57 Austrian Code of Civil Procedure.
Update of 28 September 2022: New entries are printed bold. Brexit and the Future of Private International Law in English Courts”, Oxford 2022. A Guide to Global Private International Law”, Oxford 2022, forthcoming. Breaking) News From The Hague: A Game Changer in International Litigation? Explanatory Reports.
Update of 31 August 2022: New entries are printed bold. Brexit and the Future of Private International Law in English Courts”, Oxford 2022. A Guide to Global Private International Law”, Oxford 2022, forthcoming. Breaking) News From The Hague: A Game Changer in International Litigation? Explanatory Reports.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has begun 2023 with its first precedential patent decision in DexCom, Inc. In an opinion by Judge Stoll, the court affirmed a district courtdecision denying DexCom’s motion for a preliminary injunction. Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc., 2023-1795 (Fed. January 3, 2024).
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content