Patently O

MARCH 13, 2024

The Supreme Court’s denial of Purdue’s request for a 30-day extension serves as a reminder that even in cases involving significant legal questions, the Court expects parties to follow its procedural rules and provide strong justifications for any deviations. 2022-1482 (Fed. Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.,

Court 52

Court Diligence Statute Court Rules 52

Day on Torts

MAY 18, 2022

M2021-00487-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 1404357 (Tenn. May 4, 2022), plaintiffs filed this pro se action that revolved around a newly built home they bought in August 2017 that had allegedly developed severe mold issues. In Simpkins v. John Maher Builders, Inc. , Code Ann. § 28-3-105.) On appeal, dismissal was partially reversed.

Tort 59

Tort Statute Diligence Contract 59

Day on Torts

DECEMBER 5, 2022

Where there was material evidence to show that plaintiff met her required due diligence, the jury verdict for plaintiff on her intentional misrepresentation and fraud claim was affirmed. M2021-01335-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 17175608 (Tenn. 23, 2022), the issues revolved around plaintiff’s purchase of a home. In Hogue v.

Compensatory Damages 59

Compensatory Damages Punitive Damages Tort Diligence 59

At the Lectern

MARCH 16, 2023

Division Three disagreed with the Second District, Division Seven, opinion in In re Brown (2022) 76 Cal.App.5th 5th 296, of which the Supreme Court considered granting review on its own motion, but decided not to (see here ). The court granted the Attorney General’s petition for review in People v. 15, 2022, No.

Felony 40

Felony Court Construction Statute 40