This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on Thursday upheld a New York law that permits state and private actors to sue gun manufacturers and sellers for contributing to gun violence. The post US federal appeals court upholds New York law allowing lawsuits against gun manufacturers appeared first on JURIST - News.
The US Supreme Court declined to hear a challenge Monday to the appellate courtdecision that struck down Minnesota law prohibiting adults aged 18-20 from obtaining a permit to own guns and carry them in public. ” said Second Amendment Foundation founder and Executive Vice President Alan M.
The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments Monday over a challenge to Louisiana’s recently redrawn voting map and its two Black-majority districts. But this has became life as usual for the states under this Court’s voting cases.” It is unclear how the court will rule in the case.
The Supreme Court has not yet granted writ of certiorari in any patent cases this term. Rather, any new grant this term will very likely be pushed back to the October 2022 Term for hearing and decision. Still, there are a number of important patent cases pending before the court. 21-746 (CVSG requested February 22, 2022).
Last Friday, December 20, 2024, the Sabin Center submitted an amicus brief to the New York State Court of Appeals the states highest court in support of the City of New York in Glen Oaks Village Owners, Inc., City of New York began in 2022, when a group of cooperative apartment owners filed suit seeking to invalidate Local Law 97.
But the courts have taken the general provision and given it substantial meaning beyond the text. Senator Tillis has introduced legislation that would re-write Section 101 — taking back authority from the courts and detailing the scope of eligibility as broadly extending to technology-based innovation.
In 2019, we blogged that the District Court found for the plaintiffs, holding that CMS did not have the statutory authority to make such a change without first conducting a hospital acquisition cost survey data. The District Court opinion was subsequently reversed by the D.C. S. _ (2022). See 42 U.S.C. Becerra, No.
With the holidays upon us and the end of the year fast approaching, the FCC took care of one piece of business required by statute as it released a Public Notice announcing the start of the 2022 Quadrennial Review of the FCC’s ownership rules.
Tribal courts are often the only immediately available forum to address violent crime in Indian Country, but the sentences they can impose are extremely limited and often insufficient. Denezpi was sentenced to 140 days by the Court of Indian Offenses pursuant to that plea, time he had already served in custody. .
Kirschenbaum — In November 2020, we blogged about a decision by the Federal District Court of Maryland dismissing a Federal False Claims Act (FCA) qui tam suit alleging that Forest Laboratories knowingly reported inflated best prices under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program (MDRP), resulting in underpayment of rebates. Burr , 551 U.S.
It may have been Justice Clarence Thomas’s 74th birthday, but he was the one delivering gifts on June 23, 2022. This holding restored the right to bear arms across the country and gives hope that many other firearm restrictions — including several that have previously been upheld by courts — will be repealed or held unconstitutional.
It is possible that these interpretations of the new Act will change with new legislation or courtdecisions, so never assume what you read one day will be interpreted the same way the next day. This provision, if it becomes effective, will sunset on December 27, 2022. Below are brief descriptions of each of these amendments.
In 2021, the Supreme Court sided with the patentee in holding that the AIA trial system violated the Appointments Clause of the U.S. The Court concluded that PTAB judges were wielding the substantial power of the U.S. Oral arguments in this round of the appeal are set for March 30, 2022. by Dennis Crouch. Arthrex, Inc.
Under the Medicaid Drug Rebate statute, a pharmaceutical manufacturer whose drug prices increase faster than the rate of inflation must pay additional per-unit rebates to the program. The statute defines a “line extension” as a “new formulation” of an existing drug, with certain exceptions. Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 23-1457 (4th Cir.
The revision of this regulation, which will enter into force on 1 July 2022, provides an opportunity to examine the current and future rules by taking the example of the international service of writs of summons. Courts are struggling with the right approach to the relevant rules. van Calster: Lex ecologia.
At the Supreme Court’s conference yesterday, actions of note included: SVPA expert witness. The court granted a district attorney’s petition for review in Needham v. Superior Court. The court granted review in Seviour-Iloff v. The court also agreed to hear People v. Zuniga (2022) 79 Cal.App.5th
The district court says sided with the patentee and a jury awarded $1.2 On appeal, however, the Federal Circuit has reversed–holding that the Eddings letter constituted a “commercial offer for sale of the claimed design” and therefore created a bar to patentability under the statute. by Dennis Crouch. Larry Junker v.
The PTAB is the busiest patent court in the country. The Board cancels lots of patent claims, but also regularly sides with patentees in the Final Written Decision (at least as to some claims). 2022) (“Caltech”). 2022) (“Caltech”). by Dennis Crouch. ” 35 U.S.C. California Inst. 1348 (2018).
Supreme Court has concluded its oral arguments for the 2022-2023 Term. The Court’s final week included four cases, with issues ranging from bankruptcy to RICO to government takings. Below is a brief summary of the issues before the Court: Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. 2d 1112, 1115 (7th Cir.
Last month the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the district court’sdecision to dismiss a False Claims Act (FCA) ( 21 U.S.C This blog will continue to monitor how DOJ and the courts analyze the intersection between the FDCA and the FCA.
Supreme Court issued its first opinion of the 2022-2023 Term. S. _ (2023), a unanimous Court held that the effective date of an award of service-related disability compensation to a veteran of the United States military determined pursuant to 38 U.S.C. §§ 5110(a)(1) and 5110(b)(1) is not subject to equitable tolling.
Courts to obtain discovery in order to facilitate foreign litigation; with the pending global litigation between Eli Lilly and Novartis serving as our key example. Although most international civil courts offer some access to discovery, no other country has as extensive or powerful of a process. by Dennis Crouch. But, the U.S.
August 17, 2022). In a strategic decision Ingenio did not seek remand for full institution to try to also catch the one remaining claim 27. On remand, the district court judge (Yeakel, W.D.Tex.) The district court clearly erred in its decision by analyzing the argument as only raising issue preclusion.
Part 1: Multiple PTEs Under the PTE statute at 35 U.S.C. § For years after the enactment of the Hatch-Waxman Amendments the PTO interpreted the PTE statute to permit multiple PTEs, provided there are separate, but not necessarily different, regulatory review periods. 2020) , has not yet—and to our surprise—ended up in court.
Unfortunately, the PTA statute is not a model of clarity and has been the subject of numerous court battles over various quirky elements. The provision at issue in Sawstop has to do with PTA added for PTAB appeals and district court challenges. by Dennis Crouch. Vidal , — F.4th 4th — (Fed. 154(b)(1)(C)(iii).
Supreme Court upheld a federal law that prohibits individuals subject to a domestic violence restraining order from possessing a gun. 922(g)(8) , a federal statute that prohibits individuals subject to a domestic violence restraining order from possessing a firearm. In light of Bruen , the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed.
Supreme Court held that the Federal Arbitration Act’s (FAA) exemption for transportation workers in interstate commerce applies to transportation workers regardless of whether they work in the transportation industry. Supreme Court’sDecision The Supreme Court unanimously reversed. “A 450 (2022). In Bissonnette v.
The Supreme Court today announced it will hear nine cases on its late-May calendar. That’s as many arguments as on next week’s large early-May calendar , and it puts the court on pace to issue well over 50 opinions this term. The court granted review in March 2023. 2022) _ U.S. _ [142 S.Ct. Sundance, Inc.
With the ambiguity of the statutory text, FDA looked at the plain language, context, and the structure and purpose of the statute—including both parties’ positions on those points. Notably, the purpose of the statute seemed to govern much of FDA’s interpretation. mL was approved on March 18, 2022. mL and 20 mg/0.4
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has begun 2023 with its first precedential patent decision in DexCom, Inc. In an opinion by Judge Stoll, the court affirmed a district courtdecision denying DexCom’s motion for a preliminary injunction. District Court for the District of Delaware. 2023-1795 (Fed.
This interesting case comment has been kindly provided to the blog by Nicolás Zambrana-Tévar , LLM, PhD, KIMEP University The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has found in favor of Spain as defendant in a property case spanning several decades.
Federal Court Found Flaws in New Climate Change Analysis for Wyoming Oil and Gas Leases. The federal district court for the District of Columbia ruled that the U.S. Second, the court concluded that BLM should have calculated and considered total greenhouse emissions, instead of merely relying on comparisons of yearly emission rates.
The Supreme Court of Wisconsin ruled Wednesday that a 1849 statute that banned nearly all abortions is unenforceable. The majority held that the state legislature “impliedly repealed” the statute through its comprehensive abortion care legislation over the past 50 years.
The Supreme Court on Wednesday took the rare action of vacating submission of two already argued cases and ordering supplemental briefing. The court expects the cases will be resubmitted on August 13, which would have opinions filing as late as November 10. Both cases have received much publicity. Paxton (June 27, 2025, No.
But Weaver argued that she could not reasonably have been expected to know her actions were unconstitutional—a claim that an appeals court panel unanimously rejected last Friday. After Counts rejected that claim, Brunner appealed to the 5th Circuit, which affirmed Counts' decision in December 2022. That ruling by the U.S.
Hirshfeld has the legal power to fulfill the expanded job as required by the Supreme Court’s decision. Guest post by Nina Mendelson , Following one Supreme Courtdecision posing dangers for the integrity of all sorts of agency adjudication, the ongoing litigation in Arthrex v. — Dennis Crouch.
Here are some of the notable actions at yesterday’s Supreme Court conference , a double one: Striking a strike. The court granted review in People v. to reconsider past decisions to impose prior strikes” and that “[c]ourts should consider Section 1385.” The court decided to also hear People v.
Supreme Court struck down the Biden Administration’s student loan forgiveness program. In 2022, as the COVID–19 pandemic came to its end, the Secretary invoked the HEROES Act to issue “waivers and modifications” reducing or eliminating the federal student debt of most borrowers. In Biden v. Nebraska , 600 U.S. _ (2023), the U.S.
Report authors highlighted a recent Supreme Courtdecision in Canada. This month in a landmark decision in R v Bissonnette , the Canadian Supreme unanimously ruled life without parole sentences unconstitutional on the basis that sentences that extend beyond a person’s natural ability to outlive them are cruel and unusual punishments.
At the Supreme Court’s conference today, a double one, there were no straight grants , but there were actions of note, including: Reproductive rights legislation. The court granted review in People v. There were eight criminal case grant-and-holds : three more waiting for a decision in People v.
In preparation of the Conference on the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention on 9/10 September 2022, taking place on campus of the University of Bonn, Germany, we are offering here a Repository of contributions to the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention. Update of 20 April 2022: New entries are printed bold. Åkerfeldt, Xerxes. Amurodov, Jahongir.
Update of 28 September 2022: New entries are printed bold. Brexit and the Future of Private International Law in English Courts”, Oxford 2022. Indirect jurisdiction and Swedish law – Analysis and inquiry of the jurisdiction of Swedish courts in relation to the 2019 Hague Convention on Recognition and Enforcement”.
Update of 31 August 2022: New entries are printed bold. Brexit and the Future of Private International Law in English Courts”, Oxford 2022. Indirect jurisdiction and Swedish law – Analysis and inquiry of the jurisdiction of Swedish courts in relation to the 2019 Hague Convention on Recognition and Enforcement”.
Share The Petitions of the Week column highlights some of the cert petitions recently filed in the Supreme Court. Nearly 25 years ago, the Supreme Court upheld a federal restriction on the amount of money political parties can spend at the direction of candidates for office. A quarter-century later, in 2001, the court in FEC v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content