This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
On December 30, 2022, the Chinese legislator, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, published a draft of the Civil ProcedureLaw Amendment for public consultation. The Berkeley Center for Law and Technology organized a panel discussion on the draft.
Background China’s Civil ProcedureLaw was enacted in April 1991 by the Fourth Session of the Seventh National People’s Congress. The latest amendments to the Civil ProcedureLaw in 2023, referred to as the new CPL, involve 26 amendments, including 14 modified articles and 15 new additions. See the table below.
Date: Friday, 30 September 2022. the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for ProceduralLaw, the University of Heidelberg, the Free University of Brussels, the University of Zagreb, and the University of Vilnius. The interaction between the EFFORTS Regulations and national enforcement procedures. Registration is compulsory.
Choice of Law Most Chinese courts tend to apply lex fori on the effectiveness of asymmetric choice of court agreements. However, in 2022, the Supreme Peoples Court of PRC (hereinafter referred to as SPC) issued Summary of National Symposium on Foreign-Related Commercial and Maritime Trials of Courts (hereinafter referred to as the Summary).
Ayer Chair in Business Law and Martin Luther King Jr. Professor of Law at UC Davis School of Law. In December 2022, Chinese lawmakers published a draftlaw on foreign state immunity , an English translation of which is now available. These provisions generally follow the U.N. Convention.
On 15 July 2022, the Supreme Court of New South Wales (“NSW”) recognized and enforced a Chinese judgment issued by the Shanghai Pudong New Area People’s Court 12 years ago in Tianjin Yingtong Materials Co Ltd v Young [2022] NSWSC 943. [1] Candidate, Institute of International Law, Wuhan University. [1] Written by Zilin Hao*.
Thus, in the Indonesian legal system, there is an interplay of civil law, which is inherited from the Dutch East Indies, adat (customary law), and Islamic law. It was especially fascinating to me to discover here that the Indonesian language is usually a legal requirement for drafting contracts involving Indonesians.
To date, Paraguay is the only country to have implemented into its national law the Hague Principles on Choice of Law in International Commercial Contracts. Unlike the Principles, however, Law No.
American private international law (Conflict of Laws, “Conflicts Law”) addresses procedure (jurisdiction of courts, recognition of judgments) as well as the choice of the applicable law. The following comments first recall the role of restatements in American law.
Written by NIE Yuxin and LIU Chang, Wuhan University Institute of International Law. The present Civil ProcedureLaw of China (hereinafter “CPL”) was enacted in 1990 and has been amended four times. All amendments made no substantive adjustments to the foreign-related civil procedure proceedings. Background. 276, para.
by Achim Czubaiko, Research Fellow („Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter“) and PhD Candidate, supported by the German Scholarship Foundation, Institute for German and International Civil ProceduralLaw, University of Bonn. 30] Draft Statutory Instruments 2024 No. Regulations 2024 (“Draft Guidelines”). Court of Session). [35]
The EU Sustainability Directive and Jurisdiction The Draft for a Corporate Sustainable Due Diligence Directive currently contains no rules on jurisdiction. Nor do we want to add to the lively discussion on the choice-of-law- aspects regarding civil liability (see, amongst others, van Calster , Ho-Dac , Dias and, before the Proposal, Rühl ).
Nitschmann: The consequences of Brexit on Civil Judicial Cooperation between Germany and the United Kingdom The United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union has far-reaching consequences for international civil procedurelaw. 57 Austrian Code of Civil Procedure. The principle stated in para. A reshaping of Art.
Spring 2022 is roaring forward – and this semester is an especially busy one for me. All of this has given me a terrific opportunity to really think about procedure, law, and data. While this paper may not be for all readers, if this is a subject that’s interesting to you, you can read the draft here: [link].
Cornell), Bachelor of Laws (ZUEL). * The doctrine of forum non conveniens is an important principle in civil procedurelaws and frequently applied by courts in many legal systems, especially those of common law countries.
Freitag: More Freedom of Choice in Private International Law on the Name of a Person! The author analyses the background of the decision and discusses its consequences for the long-standing conflict of procedurallaws ( Justizkonflikt) between the United States and Germany.
On 23 February 2022, the European Commission published its proposal of a Directive on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence (CSDD) in respect to human rights and the environment. For those interested, there are many contributions available online, namely in the Oxford Business Law Blog, which dedicates a whole series to it ( here ).
For the law of state immunity, this move is particularly significant because China had been the most important adherent to the rival, absolute theory of foreign state immunity. In two prior posts ( here and here ), I discussed a draft of the FSIL (English translation here ). This provision also follows the U.N. but not to “rulings.”
On 9 September 2022, the Max Planck Institute for ProceduralLaw Luxembourg hosted a conference on the Brussels Ibis Reform, in collaboration with the KU Leuven and the EAPIL. Since its establishment in 1968, it has been constantly evolving. The group is led by Burkhard Hess (MPI Luxembourg) and Geert van Calster (KU Leuven).
In preparation of the Conference on the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention on 9/10 September 2022, taking place on campus of the University of Bonn, Germany, we are offering here a Repository of contributions to the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention. Update of 20 April 2022: New entries are printed bold. 1 of December 2018 (available here ).
Accompanying such a rule are also some provisions that deal with matters of civil procedure and conflict of laws, though as has been pointed out earlier on this blog by Kilimcioglu, Kruger, and Van Hof, the CSDDD is mostly silent on PIL. These rules on civil procedure naturally apply to both domestic cases and cross-border situations.
Update of 28 September 2022: New entries are printed bold. Judgments Convention: Revised Draft Explanatory Report”, HCCH Prel.-Doc. Brexit and the Future of Private International Law in English Courts”, Oxford 2022. A Guide to Global Private International Law”, Oxford 2022, forthcoming. Explanatory Reports.
Update of 31 August 2022: New entries are printed bold. Judgments Convention: Revised Draft Explanatory Report”, HCCH Prel.-Doc. Brexit and the Future of Private International Law in English Courts”, Oxford 2022. A Guide to Global Private International Law”, Oxford 2022, forthcoming. Explanatory Reports.
In preparation of the Conference on the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention on 9/10 September 2022 , planned to be taking place on campus of the University of Bonn, Germany, we are offering here a Repository of contributions to the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention. Judgments Convention: Revised Draft Explanatory Report”, HCCH Prel.-Doc.
Rescheduled: “The HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention: Prospects for Judicial Cooperation in Civil Matters between the EU and Third Countries” – Conference on 9 and 10 September 2022, University of Bonn, Germany. Update of 12 January 2022: New entries are printed bold. Judgments Convention: Revised Draft Explanatory Report”, HCCH Prel.-Doc.
Rescheduled: “The HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention: Prospects for Judicial Cooperation in Civil Matters between the EU and Third Countries” – Conference on 9 and 10 September 2022, University of Bonn, Germany. Judgments Convention: Revised Draft Explanatory Report”, HCCH Prel.-Doc. Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève.
Update of 7 June 2022: New entries are printed bold. Judgments Convention: Revised Draft Explanatory Report”, HCCH Prel.-Doc. Brexit and the Future of Private International Law in English Courts”, Oxford 2022. A Guide to Global Private International Law”, Oxford 2022, forthcoming. Explanatory Reports.
In preparation of the Conference on the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention on 9/10 September 2022, taking place on campus of the University of Bonn, Germany, we are offering here a Repository of contributions to the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention. Update of 16 February 2022: New entries are printed bold. Nygh, Peter; Pocar, Fausto.
79-109 (available here ) Amurodov, Jahongir “Some issues of Ratification of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters (2019) by the Republic of Uzbekistan”, Uzbek Law Review 2020-03, pp. 11 of August 2000 (available here ), pp 19-128 II. 166-172 (available here ) Brand, Ronald A.
79-109 (available here ) Amurodov, Jahongir “Some issues of Ratification of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters (2019) by the Republic of Uzbekistan”, Uzbek Law Review 2020-03, pp. 11 of August 2000 (available here ), pp 19-128 II. 166-172 (available here ) Brand, Ronald A.
79-109 (available here ) Amurodov, Jahongir “Some issues of Ratification of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters (2019) by the Republic of Uzbekistan”, Uzbek Law Review 2020-03, pp. 11 of August 2000 (available here ), pp 19-128 II. 166-172 (available here ) Brand, Ronald A.
In March 2022, the German Environment Agency determined that Germany’s transportation and building sectors had exceeded their maximum allowable annual emissions (the building sector exceeded its sectoral target by 2.5 (Examples abound: see here , here , and here ). million tons of CO2 equivalent). That incentive function would then be gone.
Written by Jidong Lin, Wuhan University Institute of International Law Background China’s newly amended Civil ProcedureLaw (“CPL 2024”), which came into effect on 1 January 2024, introduces several distinct and innovative changes. npc/c2/c30834/202112/t20211227_315637.html> html> accessed 13 October 2024. [2]
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content