This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Background China’s Civil ProcedureLaw was enacted in April 1991 by the Fourth Session of the Seventh National People’s Congress. However, no substantial revisions were made to the provisions concerning foreign-related civil litigation. Since then, it had undergone four revisions in 2007, 2012, 2017, and 2021. Jurisdiction 2.1
Accompanying such a rule are also some provisions that deal with matters of civil procedure and conflict of laws, though as has been pointed out earlier on this blog by Kilimcioglu, Kruger, and Van Hof, the CSDDD is mostly silent on PIL. This disclosure must adhere to national procedurallaws.
The second issue of 2022 of Giustizia Consensuale (published by Editoriale Scientifica) has just been released, and it features: Ferruccio Auletta and Alberto Massera , Giustizia consensuale e p.a.: Observatory on Legislation and Regulations Mauro Bove, I verbali che concludono la mediazione nel d.lgs.
This article gives a glimpse of how Chinese courts handle asymmetric choice of court agreements in international and commercial civil litigations. [4] Choice of Law Most Chinese courts tend to apply lex fori on the effectiveness of asymmetric choice of court agreements. Chen & Su , (2022) Lu Min Zhong 567 Hao [(2022)???567?].
The revision of this regulation, which will enter into force on 1 July 2022, provides an opportunity to examine the current and future rules by taking the example of the international service of writs of summons. EU private international law rules are almost always value neutral. This norm is part of procedurallaw.
‘Die deutsche Rechtsprechung auf dem Gebiete des Internationalen Privatrechts’, or short ‘IPRspr’, offers the complete and systematic documentation of German case law on private international law, including procedurallaw and foreign law. As a book publication, however, the IPRspr will be discontinued.
The second issue of 2022 of the Rivista di diritto internazionale privato e processuale (RDIPP, published by CEDAM) was just released. This article addresses the complex features and problems arising from the combined application of all European and international instruments dealing with divorce and the economic aspects of family law.
Magnus: A new Private International Law and new Procedural Rules for Adoptions in Germany. As a result of two recent reforms the German private international and procedurallaws applicable to adoptions have changed quite substantively. The following article presents the German implementing rules for this recast.
Of course, the law of judgments remains critically important to both ensure justice and stability. On May 12, 2022, the Supreme Court is set to decide whether to move forward with the pending case of PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC v. 4] A lot has happened in procedurallaw 1907. Patreon, Inc. ,
Reimann: Human Rights Litigation Beyond the Alien Tort Claims Act: The Crucial Role of the Act of State Doctrine. The Kashef case currently before the federal courts in New York shows that human rights litigation against corporate defendants in the United States is alive and well.
Penasthika rightly observes that this signifies confusion between jurisdiction and choice of law, because what the Indonesian courts should apply is substantive and not procedurallaw. Procedurallaw matters are reserved for the forum, and some Indonesian judges only appear to see the procedural aspects of choice of law.
The third issue for the Journal of Private International Law for 2022 was published today. This contribution maps the meaning and nature of those articles, their application in early case-law across Member States, and their impact among others on business and human rights litigation, pre and post Brexit.
Hübner: Climate change litigation at the interface of private and public law – the foreign permit. The article deals with the interplay of private international law, substantive law, and public law in the realm of international environmental liability. Montana Eighth Judicial District Court / Ford Motor Company v.
The Chinese Supreme People’s Court (hereinafter “ SPC “) issued “SPC’s Regulation on Several Matters Concerning the Jurisdiction of Foreign-Related Disputes” (hereinafter “ Regulation 2022 “), [1] which will enter into force on 1st January 2023. Main Content. Convenience and Efficiency.
Cornell), Bachelor of Laws (ZUEL). * The doctrine of forum non conveniens is an important principle in civil procedurelaws and frequently applied by courts in many legal systems, especially those of common law countries.
This solution will have a significant impact on French litigation in this area. Previous issues of the Revue Critique (from 2010 to 2022) are available on Cairn. Thus, a French creditor can no longer initiate collective proceedings in France against a debtor who has virtually no connection with France.
Nitschmann: The consequences of Brexit on Civil Judicial Cooperation between Germany and the United Kingdom The United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union has far-reaching consequences for international civil procedurelaw. 57 Austrian Code of Civil Procedure. A reshaping of Art. Pursuant to Art.
On 7 June 2022, the Supreme Court of New South Wales recognized and enforced two Chinese judicial mediation settlement issued by the People’s Court of Qingdao, Shandong Province China in Bank of China Limited v Chen. This document is called ‘judicial mediation settlement’ in this note. What is a judicial mediation settlement.
Written by Zilin Hao, Anjie Law Firm, Beijing, China. On 17 March 2022, Shanghai Maritime Court of PRC issued a ruling of recognizing and enforcing a commercial judgment made by the English High Court, with the approval of Supreme People’s Court (“SPC”). The Chinese Court Recognizes an English Commercial Judgment for the First Time.
The EU Commission published a long awaited Proposal for a Directive on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence (CSDDD), COM(2022) 71 final, on 23 February 2022; the EU Council adopted its negotiation position on 1 December 2022; and now, the EU Parliament has suggested amendments to this Draft Directive on 1 June 2023.
Written by NIE Yuxin and LIU Chang, Wuhan University Institute of International Law. The present Civil ProcedureLaw of China (hereinafter “CPL”) was enacted in 1990 and has been amended four times. All amendments made no substantive adjustments to the foreign-related civil procedure proceedings. Background. 285, para.
The author analyses the background of the decision and discusses its consequences for the long-standing conflict of procedurallaws ( Justizkonflikt) between the United States and Germany. All in all, there are many issues where one must hope for reasonable clarifications by the ECJ G.
Spring 2022 is roaring forward – and this semester is an especially busy one for me. All of this has given me a terrific opportunity to really think about procedure, law, and data. By Jason Rantanen. And it’s fortuitously come at a time when several related projects are coming to fruition.
The decision illustrates that the relevance of the domicile of natural persons for the jurisdiction in direct actions for damages against board members (Art 4, 62 Brussels Ia Regulation) can lead to the fact that courts of different member states have to decide on crucial aspects of complex investor litigation at the same time. 36 (1) No.
In both proceedings, the question also arose as to whether the law applicable under the general rules of Art 3, 4 Rome I Regulation can be applied instead of the law applicable under Art 6 Rome I Regulation if the former is more favourable to the consumer in the specific case. 7(1)(b) Brussels Ia-Regulation.
Although Article 25(1) of the Brussels Ia Regulation differs from Article 17 of the Brussels Convention and Article 23(1) of the Brussels I Regulation, the jurisprudence of the CJEU is capable of being applied to the current provision ( Maersk , [52]; C 358/21 Tilman , EU:C:2022:923, [34]; AG Collins in Maersk , [51]-[54]).
by Achim Czubaiko, Research Fellow („Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter“) and PhD Candidate, supported by the German Scholarship Foundation, Institute for German and International Civil ProceduralLaw, University of Bonn. 2 (12) Private International Law (Implementation of Agreements) Act 2020 (c. 2022 (6), proposal 15. [38]
On 10 June 2022, the University of Trento, Faculty of Law celebrated the first anniversary of the launch of Giustizia consensuale , founded and edited by Professor Silvana Dalla Bontà and Professor Paola Lucarelli. He stated that there are three points of interaction between agreement and procedure.
Update of 28 September 2022: New entries are printed bold. Brexit and the Future of Private International Law in English Courts”, Oxford 2022. A Guide to Global Private International Law”, Oxford 2022, forthcoming. Breaking) News From The Hague: A Game Changer in International Litigation? Bibliography.
Update of 31 August 2022: New entries are printed bold. Brexit and the Future of Private International Law in English Courts”, Oxford 2022. Judgments Convention: Application to Governments”, Netherlands International Law Review (NILR) 67 (2020), pp 121-137. Explanatory Reports. Bibliography. Ahmed, Mukarrum. Cai, Ya-qi.
Based on a litigation agreement pursuant to Sections 119b (2), 184a (3) of the German Courts Constitution Act on the first instance jurisdiction of the Commercial Court and on the conduct of proceedings in English, the article analyses details of the newly created procedural instruments and their implementation in practice.
This is more so], especially since the submitted documents on the Canadian civil procedurelaw and the Regulation No. 57/2018 on the Executive Regulations of Law No. 42/2022 of 3 October 2022 ) (hereafter “ New 2022 FACP ”). [iv] Hartley, International Commercial Litigation (3 rd ed. iv] Ibid. [v]
In preparation of the Conference on the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention on 9/10 September 2022, taking place on campus of the University of Bonn, Germany, we are offering here a Repository of contributions to the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention. Update of 20 April 2022: New entries are printed bold. Biresaw, Samuel Maigreg. Cong, Junqi.
Ayer Chair in Business Law and Martin Luther King Jr. Professor of Law at UC Davis School of Law. In December 2022, Chinese lawmakers published a draft law on foreign state immunity , an English translation of which is now available. This post is cross-posted at Transnational Litigation Blog.]
Update of 7 June 2022: New entries are printed bold. Brexit and the Future of Private International Law in English Courts”, Oxford 2022. Judgments Convention: Application to Governments”, Netherlands International Law Review (NILR) 67 (2020), pp 121-137. Explanatory Reports. Report of the Special Commission”, HCCH Prel.-Doc.
Rescheduled: “The HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention: Prospects for Judicial Cooperation in Civil Matters between the EU and Third Countries” – Conference on 9 and 10 September 2022, University of Bonn, Germany. Update of 12 January 2022: New entries are printed bold. A Guide to Global Private International Law”, Oxford 2022, forthcoming.
Rescheduled: “The HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention: Prospects for Judicial Cooperation in Civil Matters between the EU and Third Countries” – Conference on 9 and 10 September 2022, University of Bonn, Germany. Judgments Convention: Application to Governments”, Netherlands International Law Review (NILR) 67 (2020), pp 121-137. 108-138.
In preparation of the Conference on the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention on 9/10 September 2022 , planned to be taking place on campus of the University of Bonn, Germany, we are offering here a Repository of contributions to the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention. A Guide to Global Private International Law”, Oxford 2022, forthcoming.
In preparation of the Conference on the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention on 9/10 September 2022, taking place on campus of the University of Bonn, Germany, we are offering here a Repository of contributions to the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention. Update of 16 February 2022: New entries are printed bold. Biresaw, Samuel Maigreg.
The FSIL’s reciprocity clause is consistent with the emphasis on reciprocity that one finds in other provisions of Chinese law. In another change from the draft law, the NPC Standing Committee has added “PRC Courts” (??????????) The general practice in China is that courts, rather than litigants, serve process.
79-109 (available here ) Amurodov, Jahongir “Some issues of Ratification of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters (2019) by the Republic of Uzbekistan”, Uzbek Law Review 2020-03, pp. Breaking) News From The Hague: A Game Changer in International Litigation?
79-109 (available here ) Amurodov, Jahongir “Some issues of Ratification of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters (2019) by the Republic of Uzbekistan”, Uzbek Law Review 2020-03, pp. Breaking) News From The Hague: A Game Changer in International Litigation?
79-109 (available here ) Amurodov, Jahongir “Some issues of Ratification of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters (2019) by the Republic of Uzbekistan”, Uzbek Law Review 2020-03, pp. Breaking) News From The Hague: A Game Changer in International Litigation?
Climate litigation in Germany has achieved another major victory. Against this backdrop, the decision of the Higher Administrative Court must also be understood as part of a new wave of climate litigation. On November 30, 2023, the Higher Administrative Court Berlin-Brandenburg ruled in DUH and BUND v. million tons of CO2 equivalent).
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content