This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
A third complaint filed more than one year after dismissal of the original complaint did not fall within the savings statute and was time barred. 23, 2024), plaintiff filed a complaint alleging several tort claims, including assault, battery, and trespass. Defendant filed a motion to dismiss based on the statute of limitations.
A third complaint filed more than one year after dismissal of the original complaint did not fall within the savings statute and was time barred. 23, 2024), plaintiff filed a complaint alleging several tort claims, including assault, battery, and trespass. Defendant filed a motion to dismiss based on the statute of limitations.
Izhar Ahmed Khan is a 2022 LL.B. Alongside, under the ‘good faith’ immunity clauses incorporated in most of the parliamentary statutes, the state institutions and their officers are provided immunity from civil claims arising from negligent or harmful actions done by them in the performance of their duties.
Where a patient left the hospital with known pressure ulcers and no wound treatment plan, the statute of limitations for his HCLA (health care liability act, formerly known as medical malpractice) claim related to those skin wounds began to run on the day he was discharged from the hospital. M2022-00476-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 16545403 (Tenn.
Where plaintiff filed a products liability claim based on a hip replacement device she had received, but her hip replacement occurred more than ten years before her suit was filed, dismissal based on the statute of repose was affirmed. W2021-00426-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 767709 (Tenn. In Jones v. Smith & Nephew Inc. , Code Ann. §
Where defendant governmental entity did not own the park where plaintiff was injured, and plaintiff was attending a concert in the park when she fell, summary judgment based on both the GTLA and Recreational Use Statute was affirmed. E2021-00189-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 3092906 (Tenn. In Costner v. internal citation and quotations omitted).
Where the gravamen of plaintiff’s complaint was his tort claim for defamation seeking unliquidated damages, the chancery court did not have subject matter jurisdiction and the case should have been transferred to circuit court. In Lowery v. Redmond , No. W2021-00611-COA-R3-CV (Tenn.
Here is my annual list of Halloween torts and crimes. Halloween has everything for a torts-filled holiday: battery, trespass, defamation, nuisance, product liability and more. However, my students and I often discuss the remarkably wide range of torts that comes with All Hallow’s Eve.
M2021-00487-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 1404357 (Tenn. May 4, 2022), plaintiffs filed this pro se action that revolved around a newly built home they bought in August 2017 that had allegedly developed severe mold issues. In Simpkins v. John Maher Builders, Inc. , Code Ann. § 28-3-105.) On appeal, dismissal was partially reversed.
M2021-00262-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 202641 (Tenn. 24, 2022), plaintiff was walking on a sidewalk in a residential neighborhood when she tripped and fell over a sewer cleanout cap that protruded from the middle of the sidewalk. In Garamella v. City of Lebanon , No. Code Ann. § This opinion was released 1.5
E2021-01156-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 2866006 (Tenn. July 21, 2022), plaintiffs were the adult daughters of decedent and defendant was the widow of decedent. Conversion is subject to a three-year statute of limitations. Lewis , No. During the later years of decedent’s life, he suffered from Alzheimer’s and his competency was disputed.
E2021-00812-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 14199150 (Tenn. 25, 2022), plaintiff filed multiple tort claims against multiple defendants, including libel claims against certain defendants based on their social media statements related to the death of a dog who died while in the care of plaintiff’s dog training business. In Laferney v.
W2020-01305-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 95167 (Tenn. 10, 2022), plaintiff had been treated by defendant doctor for cancer (defendant’s employer was also a defendant). Defendant filed a motion to dismiss, asserting that plaintiff failed to file her complaint within the three-year statute of repose. Gibson , No.
M2020-01438-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 168145 (Tenn. 19, 2022), plaintiff county filed this legal malpractice suit against defendant attorney who had represented the county in an underlying action filed by a former county employee. In Coffee County v. Spining , No. On appeal, dismissal was affirmed. This opinion was released 2.5
E2021-01513-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 16559447 (Tenn. 1, 2022), plaintiffs filed suit against defendant construction company related to defendant’s construction of plaintiffs’ residential home, and defendant filed a counterclaim, which was the claim at issue in this appeal. In Reiss v. Rock Creek Construction, Inc. ,
M2021-01347-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 16846642 (Tenn. 10, 2022), plaintiffs and defendants had been involved in extensive litigation related to a boundary line dispute running between their residential properties. Note: Chapter 104, Section 1 of Day on Torts: Leading Cases in Tennessee Tort Law has been updated to include this decision.
The 2022 edition once again proved the immense value that the Summer Courses offer. Arnaud Nuyts , from the Université Libre de Bruxelles, held a Special Course on ‘The Forum for Cyber-Torts’, which is an excellent topic in today’s day and age. It presented three juridical sources in hierarchy: statute, equity and common law.
M2021-00563-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 2069160 (Tenn. June 9, 2022), plaintiff and defendant husband were in the process of getting divorced. Note: Chapter 22 of Day on Torts: Leading Cases in Tennessee Tort Law has been updated to include this decision. internal citation omitted). In Meade v. Paducah Nissan, LLC , No.
Where plaintiffs alleged that “church entities were negligent regarding the sexual abuse of minors” by a clergyman, and the allegations included claims of fraudulent concealment through an investigation that was actually a “whitewash,” dismissal based on the statute of limitations was reversed. W2021-00353-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 1837455 (Tenn.
M2020-01291-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 1788274 (Tenn. June 2, 2022), defendant had previously been married to one of the plaintiffs, and a final decree of divorce had been issued in their divorce case. Note: Chapter 28, Section 11 of Day on Torts: Leading Cases in Tennessee Tort Law has been updated to include this decision.
E2021-01197-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 5295794 (Tenn. 7, 2022), plaintiff went to defendant hospital for treatment for a laceration on his foot. Note: Chapter 41, Section 8 of Day on Torts: Leading Cases in Tennessee Tort Law has been updated to include this decision. In Howell v.
M2020-01626-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 244108 (Tenn. 27, 2022), plaintiff purchased a piece of property in a distress sale and did not perform an inspection before the purchase. Note: Chapter 82, Section 1 of Day on Torts: Leading Cases in Tennessee Tort Law has been updated to include this decision. In Walker v. State , No.
Where plaintiff wife failed to give written notice of her loss of consortium claim against the State of Tennessee to the Division of Claims and Risk Management, dismissal of her claim was affirmed, despite the fact that her complaint was filed with the Claims Commission within the statute of limitations. In Kampmeyer v. State , No.
M2021-01021-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 2718659 (Tenn. July 13, 2022), plaintiffs’ son died and the local police department ruled the death a suicide. This case is an important read for anyone litigating a tort case involving a matter of public concern. In Adreacchio v. Hamilton , No. Summary judgment was therefore affirmed.
E2021-01330-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 3570880 (Tenn. 19, 2022), plaintiff was a passenger while defendant was driving. Note: Chapter 73, Section 6 and Chapter 106, Section 1 of Day on Torts: Leading Cases in Tennessee Tort Law has been updated to include this decision. In Owings v. Owings , No.
M2020-01651-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 17334223 (Tenn. 30, 2022), plaintiff filed a complaint against defendants asserting claims for defamation, invasion of privacy, and intentional interference with business relations. In Adamson v. Grove , No. internal citation omitted). Rule 41.01 internal citation omitted). internal citation omitted).
The revision of this regulation, which will enter into force on 1 July 2022, provides an opportunity to examine the current and future rules by taking the example of the international service of writs of summons. The refusal to provide information per se is not a tort in the sense of Article 7 No. van Calster: Lex ecologia.
M2021-00878-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 4490980 (Tenn. 28, 2022), plaintiff was a real estate professional involved in some capacity with Durham Farms, which was a large residential community. Because the TPPA is a relatively new statute, it has not been interpreted in many opinions. In Charles v. McQueen , No. The TPPA, Tenn.
E2021-012553-COA-R9-CV, 2022 WL 1788380 (Tenn. June 2, 2022), plaintiff was injured when he crashed his motorcycle after hitting a pothole on a state-owned highway. Note: Chapter 41, Section 21 of Day on Torts: Leading Cases in Tennessee Tort Law has been updated to include this decision. In Polhamus v. State , No.
M2021-00867-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 4112706 (Tenn. 9, 2022), plaintiff was a roofer who was injured while working on a homeowner’s roof. Note: Chapter 89, Section 1 and Chapter 30, Section 4 of Day on Torts: Leading Cases in Tennessee Tort Law has been updated to include this decision. In Lynch v.
E2021-00988-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 14162828 (Tenn. 25, 2022), the patient underwent a hysterectomy at a hospital in Kingsport, Tennessee. Note: Chapter 49, Section 8 of Day on Torts: Leading Cases in Tennessee Tort Law has been updated to include this decision. In Jackson v. Thibault , No.
M2021-00314-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 1633552 (Tenn. May 24, 2022) , plaintiff suffered antibiotic tendonitis, a traumatic rupture to a tendon in her ankle, and chronic tendonitis after being prescribed medication for a cough that had an adverse reaction with the steroids she had been taking for years. In Breithaupt v.
M2021-00653-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 1652552 (Tenn. May 25, 2022) (memorandum opinion), plaintiff was an inmate at defendant county’s jail. Note: Chapter 41, Section 7 of Day on Torts: Leading Cases in Tennessee Tort Law has been updated to include this decision. In Vaughn v. Coffee County, Tennessee , No.
M2021-00107-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 244532 (Tenn. 27, 2022), plaintiff’s father and defendant were neighbors. Day on Torts: Leading Cases in Tennessee Tort Law ? Day on Torts: Leading Cases in Tennessee Tort Law? Compendium of Tennessee Tort Reform Cases ) is available by subscription at? Fuqua , No.
E2021-00881-COA-R9-CV, 2022 WL 1117453 (Tenn. April 14, 2022), plaintiff filed an HCLA claim against several defendants, including the State of Tennessee as the employer of Dr. Landry, who was allegedly negligent. In Gilbert v. State , No. This opinion was released three months after oral arguments in this case.
M2020-01507-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 420666 (Tenn. 11, 2022), plaintiff was injured in a one-car accident caused by tire debris on the interstate. Note: Chapter 30, Section 1 and Chapter 73, Section 6 of Day on Torts: Leading Cases in Tennessee Tort Law has been updated to include this decision. In Walker v. McMillin , No.
M2019-02238-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 202639 (Tenn. 24, 2022), plaintiffs were the parents of a minor child who was severely injured when he was playing on property owned by defendant church and he came into contact with a downed power line. In Kelly v. Debre Keranio Medhanialem Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church , No.
The homeowner appealed arguing that, in limiting her recovery to $3,600, the trial court interpreted the statute too narrowly. Because the trial court properly interpreted the statute, we affirm the trial court’s decision. Seven of the civil cases are tort cases. Code Ann. § 20-12-119(c). Appellants’ Briefs Filed: May 5, 2021.
M2020-01448-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 1210462 (Tenn. April 25, 2022), plaintiff was shot multiple times by her estranged husband in August 2018. Note: Chapter 41, Sections 5 and 18 of Day on Torts: Leading Cases in Tennessee Tort Law has been updated to include this decision. In Haynes v. Perry County, Tennessee , No.
W2020-00430-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 353697 (Tenn. 7, 2022), plaintiff was in a car accident caused by an employee of defendant, and defendant had admitted fault. Note: Chapter 25, Section 10 of Day on Torts: Leading Cases in Tennessee Tort Law has been updated to include this decision. In Malone v.
M2019-01748-SC-R11-CV, 2022 WL 175804 (Tenn. 20, 2022), plaintiff met with defendant doctor to discuss a breast reduction surgery, and defendant stated that “he was a board-certified plastic surgeon.” In Cooper v. Mandy , No. Click on the link to see the book’s Table of Contents.
M2021-00877-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 4841912 (Tenn. 4, 2022), plaintiff was leaving a church service and walking on sidewalks owned by defendant city when she tripped and fell. The statute at the core of the appeal was Tenn. In Mitchell v. City of Franklin, Tennessee , No. internal citation omitted). Code Ann. §
E2021-01085-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 3589838 (Tenn. 23, 2022), several insurance companies filed suit against the City of Sevierville, Sevier County Electric System (SCES), and Wolf Tree, who was SCES’s vegetation management contractor (the cases filed by the insurance companies were consolidated). Sevier County Electric System , No.
M2021-01335-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 17175608 (Tenn. 23, 2022), the issues revolved around plaintiff’s purchase of a home. Note: Chapter 40, Section 8 and Chapter 72, Section 1 of Day on Torts: Leading Cases in Tennessee Tort Law has been updated to include this decision. In Hogue v. P&C Investments, Inc. ,
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content