This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The US Supreme Court Monday granted both Jones v. Both of these cases were added to the 2022-2023 docket. The Supreme Court previously denied Jones certiorari but granted it after the Eighth Circuit affirmed a lower court’s dismissal of his habeas petition in August 2021. ” Jones v. Cochran is.
Constitutionallaw took center stage in many U.S. Supreme Court and the New Jersey Supreme Court cases decided in 2023. Supreme Court’s Most Significant Decisions of 2023 In Students for Fair Admissions v. Supreme Court’s Most Significant Decisions of 2023 In Students for Fair Admissions v.
.” The select committee explained that even when there is clear evidence that refugees sent to Rwanda are at risk of refoulement, decision-makers and courts must still regard it as a safe country when determining whether to send refugees there. The committee concluded that this may be a breach of the separation of powers.
Written by Hadrien Pauchard (assistant researcher at Sciences Po Law School) The fourth issue of the Revue critique de droit International privé of 2023 (available here ) was released online some time ago. It features two articles and several case notes. The full table of contents is available here.
Tarar further stated that the constitution and prevailing laws are followed by the courts in Pakistan, further emphasising that Khan is in jail as a convicted prisoner. The WGAD demanded Khan’s immediate release, claiming that his arrest was arbitrary and in violation of international law.
Supreme Court will hear two significant voting rights cases out of Arizona. It also has a “ballot-collection law,” known as H.B. 2023, which permits only certain persons (i.e., Both lawsuits before the Court involve the above provisions. Issues Before the Supreme Court. Next month, the U.S.
United States , 598 U.S. _ (2023), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the penalty for the nonwillful failure to file a Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) is $10,000 per report rather than per account. The statute imposes a maximum $10,000 penalty for nonwillful violations of the law. In Bittner v.
Hennepin County , 598 U.S. _ (2023), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the government can’t keep the profits of properties sold to satisfy tax debts. The District Court dismissed the suit for failure to state a claim, and the Eighth Circuit affirmed. Supreme Court’s Decision The Supreme Court reversed. In Tyler v.
Supreme Court’s decision in Axon Enterprise, Inc. Federal Trade Commission , 598 U.S. _ (2023), allows federal district courts to consider constitutional challenges to administrative proceedings prior to the issuance of final rulings. Cochran’s and Axon’s suits were both dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Hansen , 599 U.S. _ (2023), the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a federal law that criminalizes “encouraging or inducing” an immigrant to come or remain in the United States unlawfully. According to the Court, the law does not run afoul of the First Amendment. In United States v.
Supreme Court next term. The justices recently granted certiorari in two cases challenging state laws that restrict social media companies’ ability to moderate content on their platforms. The key issue before the Court is whether the Texas and Florida laws violate the First Amendment. The court held that S.B.
On Monday, May 8, 2023, the Hamburg Max Planck Institute will host its 33th monthly virtual workshop Current Research in Private International Law at 3 :00 p.m. – 5 :00 p.m. The discussion discussion will be in German. After opening statements from the panelists, the discussion will be opened to the audience.
Supreme Court recently added to its growing list of high-profile intellectual property cases, agreeing to consider Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. Issues Before the Supreme Court. However, the Supreme Court is expected to issue a decision before the term ends in June 2023. VIP Products LLC. 1125(c)(3)(C).
Colorado , 600 U.S. _ (2023), the U.S. Supreme Court held that to establish that a statement is a “true threat” unprotected by the First Amendment, the state must prove that the defendant had some subjective understanding of the statements’ threatening nature, based on a showing no more demanding than recklessness. In Counterman v.
Supreme Court recently agreed to consider a case that is expected to define the scope of federal identity theft law. The specific issue before the Court in Dubin v. After a district court upheld the convictions, Dubin appealed. Issues Before the Supreme Court. Facts of the Case.
600 U.S. _ (2023), the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of state laws requiring corporations operating within their borders to consent to personal jurisdiction when they register to do business in those states. According to the Court, such laws do not offend the Constitution’s Due Process Clause.
Buckley , 598 U.S. _ (2023), the U.S. Supreme Court held that debts incurred by fraud can’t be discharged in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy, even if a debtor wasn’t culpable for the fraud. Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote on behalf of the unanimous Court. In Bartenwerfer v. Invoking Strang v. Bradner , 114 U.S. Bradner , 114 U.S.
Today I have the honor of speaking to the judges and lawyers in the 2023 Ohio Judicial conference on the Supreme Court in Columbus, Ohio. I will be discussing the last year of cases and controversies for the Court, incluiding recent and upcoming decisions. However, this is shaping up as another huge year for the Court.
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in two big cases involving Big Tech this week. The federal courts of appeal are currently split regarding whether section 230(c)(l) immunizes an interactive computer service when it makes targeted recommendations of information provided by such another party. The cases, Gonzalez v. The post U.S.
Smagin ,599 U.S. _ (2023), the U.S. Supreme Court held that a plaintiff alleges a “domestic injury” as mandated under RJR Nabisco, Inc. The District Court initially froze Yegiazaryan’s California assets before finally entering judgment against him. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed. In Yegiazaryan v.
Supreme Court recently agreed to consider two cases involving the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution. United States, will decide whether a defendant’s rights under the Confrontation Clause were violated when his codefendant’s redacted out-of-court confession was admitted during his trial. The first, Smith v.
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in three cases this week, with the Second Amendment taking center stage. In the wake of the country’s most recent mass shooting, the justices considered a case that could overturn a federal gun law. The case, United States v. 1681 et seq.,
. ——————————————————————————————- [1] Brain Bennett, Hunter Biden Sold “Illusion of Access” to Father, Former Associate Testifies , Time, July 31, 2023. [2]
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in four cases last week. While the case centers on the EPA’s regulation of interstate air pollution under the Clean Air Act, the issues before the Court are largely procedural. In 2023, the EPA disapproved the submissions of 21 states and proposed its own federal-implementation plan.
Ross , 598 U.S. _ (2023), the U.S. Supreme Court rejected a constitutional challenge to a California animal welfare law that requires pork sold in the state to come from humanely raised pigs. According to the Court, the law did not violate the dormant commerce clause in regulating the pork industry outside California.
Supreme Court issued its first opinion of the 2022-2023 Term. S. _ (2023), a unanimous Court held that the effective date of an award of service-related disability compensation to a veteran of the United States military determined pursuant to 38 U.S.C. §§ 5110(a)(1) and 5110(b)(1) is not subject to equitable tolling.
Supreme Court has added another high-profile case to its docket, agreeing to address the religious rights of employees. The Supreme Court granted certiorari on January 13, 2023. The Supreme Court granted certiorari on January 13, 2023. Oral arguments are scheduled for April 18, 2023. The case, Groff v.
Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in its first significant Second Amendment case in two years. Rahimi, will decide whether a federal law banning the possession of guns by individuals who are subject to domestic violence restraining orders is constitutional. The case, United States v.
Sturgis Public Schools , 598 U.S. _ (2023), the U.S. Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote on behalf of the unanimous Court. After settling his administrative complaint, Perez sued in federal district court under the ADA seeking compensatory damages. As explained by the Supreme Court, Section §1415( l ) contains two key clauses.
Supreme Court has concluded its oral arguments for the 2022-2023 Term. The Court’s final week included four cases, with issues ranging from bankruptcy to RICO to government takings. Below is a brief summary of the issues before the Court: Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. 2d 1112, 1115 (7th Cir.
Pennsylvania and Wisconsin , 598 U.S. _ (2023), the U.S. Supreme Court held that uncashed MoneyGram checks are governed by the Disposition of Abandoned Money Orders and Traveler’s Check Act (FDA) and should be returned to the state where they were issued. In Delaware v. It was Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s first opinion.
VIP Products LLC , 599 U.S. _ (2023), the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously found that when an alleged trademark infringer uses the mark as a designation of source for its own goods or services the threshold test for expressive works established in Rogers v. Justice Elena Kagan wrote on behalf of the unanimous Court.
Supreme Court’s January docket features several closely watched cases involving constitutionallaw. The Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction, holding that Longoni’s testimony did not violate the Confrontation Clause. Issues Before the Supreme Court In appealing to the U.S. In Smith v.
600 U.S. _ (2023), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the trademark infringement provisions of the Lanham Act do not apply extraterritorially, but rather extend only to claims where the infringing use in commerce is domestic. Supreme Court’s Decision The Supreme Court reversed by a vote of 5-4. In Abitron Austria GmbH v.
DeJoy , 600 U.S. _ (2023), the U.S. Supreme Court modified the religious accommodation standard under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which requires employers to accommodate the religious practice of their employees unless doing so would impose an “undue hardship on the conduct of the employer’s business.” In Groff v.
S. _ (2023), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the False Claims Act’s scienter element — which asks whether a defendant “knowingly” submitted a “false” claim to the government — refers to a defendant’s knowledge and subjective beliefs — not to what an objectively reasonable person may have known or believed. SuperValu Inc. ,
United States , 599 U.S. _ (2023), the U.S. Supreme Court narrowed the scope of a federal aggravated identity theft statute. The issue before the Court was whether, in defrauding Medicaid, he also committed “[a]ggravated identity theft” under 18 U.S.C. Supreme Court’s Decision The Supreme Court sided with Durbin.
United States , 598 U.S. _ (2023), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Quiet Title Act’s statute of limitations is a claim-processing rule rather than a bright-line rule that constrains a court’s jurisdiction. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote on behalf of the Court. In Wilkins v. North Dakota ex rel. Board of Univ.
District Court Judge Larry Hicks dismissed the case in 2023. Now the Ninth Circuit has reversed Judge Hicks and found that Jensen is entitled to his day in court. The Court has held that, when a public employer retaliates against an employee for workplace-related speech, the First Amendment requires balanc[ing].
In the wake of its controversial 2021 term, all eyes will be on the Supreme Court when the justices return to the bench in October. Harper , an elections case out of North Carolina that involves how much oversight state courts may exercise over federal elections. The plaintiffs brought their claims in state court in light of the U.S.
Supreme Court agreed to keep the federal government’s Title 42 policy in place while legal challenges continue. By a vote of 5-4, the justices stayed a lower court decision that would have lifted the policy on December 21, 2022. Circuit Court of Appeals denied the States’ motion. In Arizona et al. Alejandro Mayorkas et al.,
the United States , 599 U.S. _ (2023), the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held that the Constitution permits the retrial of a defendant following a trial in an improper venue conducted before a jury drawn from the wrong district. In Smith v. We hold that it does not.”
the United States , 599 U.S. _ (2023), the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held that the Constitution permits the retrial of a defendant following a trial in an improper venue conducted before a jury drawn from the wrong district. In Smith v. We hold that it does not.”
Supreme Court continues to add high-profile gun rights cases to its docket. The second case centers on whether a “bump stock” – an attachment that converts a semiautomatic rifle into a fully automatic weapon – qualifies as a “machinegun” under federal law. Supreme Court granted certiorari on November 3, 2023.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content