This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The court-approved settlement requires Teslas directors including chair Robyn Denholm, Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison and former 21st Century Fox CEO James Murdoch to return roughly $277 million in cash and $459 million in stock options to the company. Tesla CEO Elon Musk did not receive compensation in his role as a director.
Supreme Court ruling addressing states' jurisdiction over out-of-state companies and a key ruling in sprawling multidistrict litigation against Silicon Valley's biggest companies over social media addiction are among Law360's top personal injury and medical malpractice cases for 2023.
Since 2012, almost 2,000 courtdecisions have referenced these cases along with 8,000+ PTAB decisions. These were clearly watershed cases that dramatically changed the landscape of patent law and patent litigation. The recent decision in Hawk Tech Sys. 2023) , highlights the current state of the law.
Gonzalez — The annual Enforcement, Litigation, and Compliance Conference put on by the Food and Drug Law Institute (“FDLI”) took place in Washington this week. FTC Supreme Courtdecision stripping FTC of its ability to obtain restitution or disgorgement under Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act. By Steven J.
In particular, the Court found that it could not impose a concrete minimum emission reduction target on Shell. This blog post explains some of the key takeaways from the appeal, highlighting some critical ground rules laid down by the court which may serve future litigation and several key challenges.
The fallout has led many companies to consider revising their DEI initiatives to stave off the threat of litigation, particularly concerning board diversity requirements. The post Supreme CourtDecision Complicates Diversity Disclosure Landscape appeared first on Intelligize.
By Jason Rantanen It’s time for the January 2023 Federal Circuit statistics update! These charts draw on the Federal Circuit Dataset Project , an open-access dataset that I maintain that contains information on all Federal Circuit decisions and docketed appeals. (Note that this figure does not include Rule 36 summary affirmances).
This blog post discusses the case and its implications for future climate litigation and policy in Czechia. Consequently, the Court found that the defendants had been in default since December 18, 2020, when the UNFCCC Secretariat received an updated EU NDC. Consequently, the case was returned to the first instance court.
Recently, the 25th Volume (2023) of JYPIL has been published. The study examines European courtdecisions, domestic legislation, and international projects aimed at stabilizing the legal status of such children. It suggests that Japan might consider recognizing parentage through foreign decisions.
Schütze: Security for costs of english plaintiffs in Austrian litigation The judgment of the Austrian Supreme Court (Oberster Gerichtshof – OGH) of 29 March 2022 deals with the obligation of English plaintiffs to provide security for costs according to sect. 57 Austrian Code of Civil Procedure. It was approved by means of Law No.
Written by Dr. Meng Yu and Dr. Guodong Du, co-founders of China Justice Observer * On 20 August 2023, China Justice Observer released the 2023 version of List of China’s Cases on Recognition of Foreign Judgments. The full version of the 2023 List of China’s Cases on Recognition of Foreign Judgments is available here.
Appellate courts issued a bevy of important decisions applying federal benefits law in 2023, including a recent Second Circuit ruling in favor of Cornell University that deepened a circuit split and a Tenth Circuit finding that an Oklahoma law regulating pharmacy benefit managers was preempted.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has begun 2023 with its first precedential patent decision in DexCom, Inc. 2023-1795 (Fed. In an opinion by Judge Stoll, the court affirmed a district courtdecision denying DexCom’s motion for a preliminary injunction. by Dennis Crouch The U.S.
Similar to other challenges against local natural gas bans, the plaintiffs in this 2023 lawsuit argued that the federal Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA) preempted Local Law 154. District Court for the Northern District of California, which ruled that EPCA did not preempt Berkleys ordinance.
Share In its first opinion of the 2023-24 term in an argued case, the Supreme Court on Tuesday morning threw out a dispute over whether a self-appointed “civil rights tester” has a legal right to file a lawsuit under the Americans with Disabilities Act alleging that a hotel had failed to provide information about its accessibility on its website.
Koblitz — Back in late September 2023 (and corrected in October), FDA issued its first interchangeable exclusivity determination pursuant to the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (“BPCIA”).
Coal-Fired power plants targeted at the case, taken by Attorney Shunsuke Sugit In March 2023, two important decisions regarding the operation of newly built coal-fired power plants were handed down by courts in Japan. This case was appealed to the Supreme Court and was closed with that Court’s refusal to review the case.
The Supreme Court of India Friday dismissed a plea challenging the Caste Census initiated in the Indian state of Bihar. By terming the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) a “Publicity Interest Litigation,” the Supreme Court lent its tacit approval to the caste census.
Bringing an administrative claim is typically much less demanding in time and resources than litigating a jury trial. H&P specifically relies on the Supreme Courtdecision in Jarkesy , as well as the 2023 Supreme Courtdecision in Axon Enterprise, Inc. In Huff and Puffers v. Constitution. FTC , 598 U.S.
They reiterate the argument today and say, “the easiest solution is for the California Supreme Court to allow the recall election to go forward, but hold that if Newsom is recalled, the lieutenant governor will then become governor until the expiration of Newsom’s term in January 2023.”
2023-6 on August 30, 2023, calling for comments from interested parties addressing dozens of questions. The Office received roughly 10,000 comments on October 30, 2023. The copyright law implications of AI training are currently being litigated in several different federal copyright infringement actions. 8] See U.S.
The 2020 update [2] , 2022 update [3] , and 2023 update [4] were also posted on Conflictoflaws.net. 2023) Gui 71 Xie Wai Ren No. 1, [13] a local Chinese court in Nanning, Guangxi Province, ruled to recognize and enforce a Thai monetary judgment in 2024. (Note: Foreign divorce judgments are excluded in the Case List.)
Goertz , 598 U.S. _ (2023), the U.S. Supreme Court held that death row inmate Rodney Reed did not wait too long to seek DNA testing of the evidence in his case. 1983 procedural due process claim begins to run at the end of the state-courtlitigation. Supreme Court’sDecision The Supreme Court reversed by a vote of 6-3.
2023) , the court has affirmed a district court denial of attorney fees for the successful defendant. In this case, the court noted a “totality of the circumstances” approach should be taken on a “case-by-case” basis. or the unreasonable manner in which the case was litigated.”
Supreme Court issued its first opinion of the 2022-2023 Term. S. _ (2023), a unanimous Court held that the effective date of an award of service-related disability compensation to a veteran of the United States military determined pursuant to 38 U.S.C. §§ 5110(a)(1) and 5110(b)(1) is not subject to equitable tolling.
Lower CourtDecisions Trade associations representing the platforms challenged both the Florida and Texas laws on First Amendment grounds. In the Florida case, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a preliminary injunction in part. 7072 was motivated by viewpoint discrimination.
After a few slow weeks on the relist front, the Supreme Court came roaring back this week with four newly relisted petitions that, if granted, will likely be added to the March 2023 argument calendar. Two years ago, in United States v. Coinbase, Inc. Bielski , 22-105. relisted after the Dec. 2 conference). United States v.
The court granted review in June 2023. Quach is expected to decide whether California’s test for determining whether a party has waived its right to compel arbitration by engaging in litigation remains valid after the United States Supreme Courtdecision in Morgan v. (Links added.) Sundance, Inc.
Milligan , 599 U.S. _ (2023), the U.S. Supreme Court held that challengers showed a reasonable likelihood of success on their claim that an Alabama Congressional redistricting plan likely violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. Alabama’s congressional map has remained remarkably similar since that litigation. In Allen v.
On Tuesday and Wednesday, May 21 and 22, in San Francisco, the court will hear the following cases (with the issue presented as summarized by court staff or limited by the court itself ): Castellanos v. The court granted review in March 2023. The court granted review in August 2022. Vigilant Insurance Co.
Several of them are sequels to earlier high courtdecisions. First Amendment The current court is very solicitous of First Amendment rights. Three trials the district court selected as non-binding “bellwether” trials resulted in plaintiff verdicts. Below we briefly discuss those 14 cases. du Pont de Nemours & Co.
United States , 598 U.S. _ (2023), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Quiet Title Act’s statute of limitations is a claim-processing rule rather than a bright-line rule that constrains a court’s jurisdiction. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote on behalf of the Court. In Wilkins v. Fort Bend County v. Davis , 587 U.S.
The last of these cases was the first climate case in the form of administrative litigation. This blog post introduces two judgments of the Yokosuka climate case, one issued in January 2023 and the second in February 2024. Therefore, the plaintiffs in the Yokosuka case have largely inherited the legal structure adopted in that case.
Even some judges on the Federal Circuit have labeled the eligibility framework as an “incoherent doctrine” [1] that might tempt district courts into “an effective coin toss,” [2] while others have openly confessed that “the nation’s lone patent court … [is] at a loss as to how to uniformly apply § 101.” [3] 2(3) (2023) [link]
by Dennis Crouch The USPTO has published new examination guidelines regarding the enablement requirement for utility patent applications in light of the Supreme Court’s May 2023decision in Amgen v. 1243 (2023). Sanofi , 143 S. Most notably, Amgen does not mention In re Wands , 858 F.2d 2d 731 (Fed. Genentech, Inc.,
The Nevada Supreme Court upheld a 2021 state ban on ghost guns Thursday, overturning a lower-courtdecision that declared the law unconstitutional for being vague. Stiglich authored the opinion of the court. That year, a US District Court also upheld the law, ruling that it did not violate the Second Amendment.
O n Monday, April 17, 2023, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit handed down a decision in California Restaurant Association v. The court overturned a District Court ruling to invalidate a Berkeley, California, prohibition on natural gas infrastructure in newly-constructed buildings. City of Berkeley.
The judge reaffirmed his conclusion that Iowa’s law banning books is “facially unconstitutional,” preventing officials from enforcing it while litigation continues. That standard, Judge Locher wrote, went beyond the US Supreme Court’s well-established precedent on obscenity for minors.
For litigants embroiled in cross-border litigation, the anti-suit injunction has become a staple in the conflict of laws arsenal of common law courts. In fact, Kea had originally advanced a cause of action for abuse of process, claiming that the alleged fraud was an abuse of process of the Kentucky Court.
In the recent case of Ingang’a & 6 others v James Finlay (Kenya) Limited (Petition 7 (E009) of 2021) [2023] KESC 22 (KLR), the Kenyan Supreme Court dismissed an appeal for the recognition and enforcement of a locus inspection order issued by a Scottish Court.
Article III standing remains a hot topic at all levels of federal litigation and across many different areas of law. He has an extensive background in chemistry, food science, and viticulture. Inter partes review is not unique. In Allgenesis Biotherapeutics Inc. Cloudbreak Therapeutics, LLC , Case No. 22-1706 (Fed. of Wildlife , 504 U.S.
The Supreme Court first recognized the fundamental constitutional right to a clean environment in Francis Coralie Mullin (1981) , where it held that the right to life and liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution encompasses “the right to health, clean environment, and basic necessities of life”.
Introduction In a previous post , I reported and commented on a decision rendered by the Abu Dhabi Supreme Court (hereinafter “ADSC”) in which the Court addressed the issue of the applicability of the Abu Dhabi Civil Marriage Law (Law No. In its judgment, the ADFCF refers to the contract dated 7 December 2023 ).
On September 1, 2023, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress promulgated the Foreign State Immunity Law of the People’s Republic of China (FSIL) (English translation here ). to Article 14(3) is significant because Chinese courtdecisions that recognize foreign judgments are considered “rulings.”
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content