Remove 2023 Remove Court Remove Demurrer Remove Laws
article thumbnail

Supreme Court will decide parole eligibility issue for young-adult offenders

At the Lectern

Yesterday’s Supreme Court conference , a double one, was one of several firsts: the first conference of 2023, the first with Patricia Guerrero as chief justice, and the first for new Justice Kelli Evans. Conference actions of note included: Supreme Court accepts Ninth Circuit jail employment case. Parole eligibility.

Court 85
article thumbnail

Three review grants, including one to resolve an issue that’s a law school staple

At the Lectern

Supreme Court actions of note at its conference yesterday included: Negligent infliction of emotional distress. The court agreed to hear Downey v. The court yesterday also granted review in Lanier v. The court also granted review in People v. The court denied review in Boydston v. ” Vehicle sales arbitration.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Review granted in a taxpayer action about COVID speedy trial rights and in yet another SB 1437 case

At the Lectern

At its conference yesterday, a double one, the Supreme Court’s actions of note included: Taxpayer standing. The court granted review in Raju v. ” The delays at issue began after a three-month COVID-pandemic shutdown of the superior court. .” The court will also hear People v. Navarro below.)

article thumbnail

Standing to Challenge Inventorship

Patently O

Sywula sued for correction of invention, and the District Court initially dismissed the case on standing, but – after an amended complaint – has now agreed that Sywula has met the requirements to survive a pleading-stage demurrer. Standing to Sue : Federal Courts can only hear “actual cases or controversies.”

article thumbnail

Gang enhancements, union protections, racially biased prosecutions, the Second Amendment, Michael Jackson, and more at the Supreme Court’s conference

At the Lectern

At yesterday’s Supreme Court’s conference , a double one, actions of note included: AB 333 retroactivity. The court agreed to hear People v. where he appeals for a second time after his judgment was conditionally reversed and the Court of Appeal issued a limited remand to the trial court to address sentencing issues?