This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Courts Tie for No. You can access the American Tort Reform Foundation’s 2023/2024 Judicial Hellholes Report at this link. You can access the American Tort Reform Foundation’s 2023/2024 Judicial Hellholes Report at this link. Courts Tie for No. “‘Nuclear Verdicts’ Again Cited as Ga.,
The US Supreme Court Thursday released the list of oral arguments it will hear during the January 2023 session. The court will hear seven arguments in a session that begins on January 9, 2023. The court will first hear arguments in the cases of In re Grand Jury and Ohio Adjutant General’s Department v.
“Merck shingles vaccine appeal will test controversial mass torts case management tool”: Alison Frankel’s “On the Case” from Reuters has this post about an appeal that I will be arguing on behalf of the plaintiffs-appellants before a three-judge panel of the U.S.
Amnesty International on Thursday condemned a Thai court’s dismissal of a spyware misuse lawsuit against NSO Group Technologies, claiming the court’s decision was an “alarming setback.”
In the 2018 case, the plaintiffs were found not to have standing because their interest in not suffering damage from climate change was not considered an individual interest to be protected (see Japanese Courts Admit the Operation of New Coal-Fired Power Plants in Kobe for more discussion).
2023-01593-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. 23, 2024), plaintiff filed a complaint alleging several tort claims, including assault, battery, and trespass. This third complaint was filed in September 2023. The trial court granted dismissal, and the Court of Appeals affirmed. In Abdou v. Brown , No. Continue reading
2023-01593-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. 23, 2024), plaintiff filed a complaint alleging several tort claims, including assault, battery, and trespass. This third complaint was filed in September 2023. The trial court granted dismissal, and the Court of Appeals affirmed. In Abdou v. Brown , No. Continue reading
Courts in Tie for No. ” The Legal Intelligencer has published this more Pennsylvania-centric version of Everett Catts’s article covering the 2023/2024 American Tort Reform Foundation’s Judicial Hellholes Report. .’” Courts in Tie for No. “Recent Rulings, Verdicts Land Pa.
66, 2023) of the Japanese Yearbook of International Law (formerly Annual Yearbook of Private International Law) – published by the International Law Association of Japan – has recently been released. 561) Tokyo District Court, Judgment, April 12, 2021 Applicable Law to Tort Liability — Infringement of a Right of Child Custody (p.
By Adeline Chong, Singapore Management University Introduction In two decisions decided within a fortnight of each other, the Singapore Court of Appeal considered anti-suit injunctions pursued to restrain proceedings allegedly brought in breach of arbitration agreements. The same points on nullity and public policy were raised.
The latest issue of the Dutch Journal on Private International Law (NIPR) has just been published NIPR 2023 issue 4 EDITORIAL I. 573-596 Abstract On 1 September 2023, the 2019 Hague Judgments Convention (HJC) entered into force in the Netherlands. Sumner, The next stops on the European international family law train / p. ARTICLES B.
The fourth issue of 2023 of the Rivista di diritto internazionale privato e processuale (RDIPP, published by CEDAM) was just released. Once the main critical aspects have been identified, the article puts forth some reform suggestions to strengthen EU private international law mechanisms in the context of environmental mass torts.
An Ontology of the In-Between [18th Ernst Rabel Lecture, 2022] [OPEN ACCESS], 433–464, DOI: 10.1628/rabelsz-2023-0063 The conflict of laws can serve heuristically to underscore two established but radically opposing models of modernist legal ordering: multilateralism and statutism. Such a prism is helpful if we want to rethink (as we must!)
Coal-Fired power plants targeted at the case, taken by Attorney Shunsuke Sugit In March 2023, two important decisions regarding the operation of newly built coal-fired power plants were handed down by courts in Japan. The court further held that the right to a stable climate was not an established right.
5–45, DOI: 10.1628/rabelsz-2023-0003 Great Debates in Company Law: The International Discourse on Fiction Theory versus Real Entity Theory. 76–117, DOI: 10.1628/rabelsz-2023-0005 Digital Infringement of Personality Rights and the Applicable Law. Zheng Sophia TANG: Smart Courts in Cross-Border Litigation, pp. Under art.
bankruptcy, class action, trademark, securities, and tort litigation, to the tune of $50 to $100 billion in investments annually. [10] That’s because current disclosure of litigation funding relies on a patchwork of state law, court rules, self-reporting, FOIA requests, leaks to journalists, and funding pitches.
Where the trial court took judicial notice of items from the court case underlying a tort action for invasion of privacy, abuse of process, and intentional infliction of emotional distress, it did not convert the motion to dismiss to a motion for summary judgment and dismissal of the claims based on the statute of limitations was affirmed.
The latest amendments to the Civil Procedure Law in 2023, referred to as the new CPL, involve 26 amendments, including 14 modified articles and 15 new additions. Further, the new CPL introduces “the place of torts committed within the territory of China” as a new connecting factor for jurisdiction. 276, para.
By Moses Wiepen, Legal Trainee at the Higher Regional Court of Hamm, Germany In its decision of 21 July 2023 (V ZR 112/22), the German Federal Court of Justice confirmed that Art. In general, following the procedural law principle of actor sequitur forum rei , the Canadian trust should be brought to court in Canadian courts.
The district court quickly issued a TRO followed-up with a preliminary injunction against the patentee. In particular, the court has held that state courttort claims associated with out-of-court patent enforcement activities are preempted by federal law unless the patent holder “acted in bad faith.”
Where plaintiff’s claims against defendant county were based on intentional torts, a one-year statute of limitations applied. 21, 2023), plaintiff was pulled over by a sheriff’s deputy employed by defendant county. In Anderson v. Lauderdale County, Tennessee , No. W2022-00332-COA-R3-CV (Tenn.
Share The Supreme Court on Monday morning issued orders from the justices’ private conference last week. The justices did not add any new cases to their merits docket for the 2023-24 term, and they did not act on several of the high-profile petitions for review that they considered on Friday.
Recently, the 25th Volume (2023) of JYPIL has been published. It outlines trends, legislative changes, and Supreme Court precedents since 1996, with a focus on judgments involving the United States and China. Part 2 provides practitioner insights into Japan’s potential accession to the Hague Conventions.
31, 2023), plaintiffs owned a restaurant in defendant City. This suit followed, asserting several contract and property claims, as well as a tort claim for intentional interference with business relationships. The trial court dismissed the tort claim against the City pursuant to the GTLA, and dismissal was affirmed on appeal.
This also applies to the extended possibility of choice of court agreements, for which it is still unclear whether exclusive prorogation is possible beyond the cases named in Article 10 section 4 of the Brussels II ter Regulation. The Federal Supreme Court requested a ruling of the Federal Constitutional Court on this issue in November 2018.
Readers of this blog may find particular interested in selected articles, case notes, books review and English translations of court decisions related to private international law. 117(1) of the Child Abduction Convention Implementation Act to a Return Agreement in an In-Court Conciliation (p. 67, 2024) has recently been released.
They all used bankruptcy to try to get out of mass tort claims. [1] 8] The second step is to then transfer the tort liabilities into the new corporations. [9] 12] Johnson & Johnson Johnson & Johnson used the Texas two-step to avoid tort liabilities regarding its talc claims. [13] 3, 2023), [link] [4] Id. [5]
Share The Supreme Court on Monday morning added two additional hours of argument, in cases involving federal funding of health care services for Native Americans and the Armed Career Criminal Act, to its docket for the 2023-24 term. The court designated six cases as bellwether cases.
At the end of each year I publish an article (in German) about the Conflict of Laws developments in Germany of the last twelve months, covering more or less the year 2024 and the last months of 2023. I would be really curious to hear whether these or similar cases are also moving courts in other jurisdictions and how courts deal with them.
14, 2023), plaintiff filed suit asserting multiple claims against the county and county employees. The trial court granted the motion, ruling that plaintiff’s claims arose out of civil rights claims and that the county therefore retained immunity under the GTLA. In Betty H. Williamson County , No. M2022-00300-COA-R3-CV (Tenn.
For litigants embroiled in cross-border litigation, the anti-suit injunction has become a staple in the conflict of laws arsenal of common law courts. This was the scenario facing the New Zealand High Court in the recent case of Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley Family Trustee Limited [2022] NZHC 2881.
And that has implications for tort law, contract law, and property law, because it is less clear in many ways how basic legal principles such as negligence, foreseeability, force majeure, and reasonableness will apply to particular problems. “You In late 2023, LSEW committed “to being net zero by 2030” in its operations.
Where plaintiff and defendant presented contradicting credible evidence regarding whether all of plaintiff’s claimed injuries were caused by the car accident at issue, the trial court’s denial of plaintiff’s motion for new trial based on her assertion that the jury’s award did not adequately compensate her for her injuries was affirmed.
On Monday morning, the Supreme Court will file its opinion in Downey v. This is one that torts professors are probably anxiously awaiting. The court granted review in July 2023. City of Riverside. Briefs here ; oral argument video here.) More about the case here.
The UK Supreme Court ruled that the cause of action in the aftermath of the 2011 Bonga offshore oil spill accrued at the moment when the oil reached the shore. On 10 May 2023, the UK Supreme Court has ruled in one of the cases in the series of legal battles started against Shell in the English courts in the aftermath of the Bonga spill.
The New Zealand Court of Appeal has just released a judgment on the cross-border application of New Zealand consumer and fair trading legislation ( Body Corporate Number DPS 91535 v 3A Composites GmbH [2023] NZCA 647 ). In response, 3AC protested the New Zealand court’s jurisdiction.
1 re 27 septembre 2023, n°22-15.146, available here ), the French Cour de cassation (première chambre civile) had the opportunity to rule on the duty of domestic courts to apply European rules of conflict on their own motion. The claim was based on general tort law and on French rules regarding “unfair competition”.
Symeonides, The Torts Chapter of the Third Conflicts Restatement: An Introduction, pp. 7–59, DOI: [link] This article presents the torts chapter of the Restatement (Third) of Conflict of Laws, as approved by the American Law Institute in May 2023. Enjoy reading: Symeon C.
One is the jurisdictional challenge of finding a competent court in the same jurisdiction as the individual users. [3] This constellation provides a strong argument for facilitating collective redress, as otherwise individual users may not be able to obtain justice for privacy infringements before the courts.
The rules regarding service outside the jurisdiction are about to change for the Supreme Court of Western Australia. In a March notice to practitioners , the Chief Justice informed the profession that the Supreme Court Amendment Rules 2024 (WA ) ( Amendment Rules ) were published on the WA legislation website on 26 March 2024.
Here are some of the actions of note at yesterday’s Supreme Court conference : Third review grant. ” This is the third time the Supreme Court has granted review in the case after a Fifth District affirmance. In 2020, the court granted and held pending the decision in People v. Espinoza (2023) 14 Cal.5th
In instances where multiple representative foundations seek to bring proceedings for the same event without reaching a settlement up to a certain point during the proceedings, the court will appoint an exclusive representative. The court’s jurisdictional analysis commences with a reference to Case C?27/17
Supreme Court returned to the bench this week to begin their February session. In the most high-profile case of the week, the Court addressed the scope of the attorney-client privilege when an attorney provides both legal and non-legal advice. The justices heard oral arguments in four cases, two of which involved labor disputes.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
189 
Let's personalize your content