Patently O

DECEMBER 4, 2023

2023-145 (Fed. The court also cited federal statutes associated with fraud against the US: 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 (Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States), 1001 (false statement to US). Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied a petition for a writ of mandamus filed by Cozy, Inc. In re: Cozy, Inc. , 21-cv-10134-JGD.

Prima Facie Case 49

Prima Facie Case Attorney Court Statute 49

Patently O

DECEMBER 13, 2023

The PTO responsive brief is due December 14, 2023. = = = The Federal Circuit recently affirmed a PTAB rejecting claims in a patent application filed by Institut Pasteur on the ground of obviousness-type double patenting. 13, 2023) (non-precedential). Cellect’s petition has been supported by 10 amicus briefs. 2022-1896 (Fed.

Prima Facie Case 53

Prima Facie Case Statute Court 53

At the Lectern

DECEMBER 12, 2024

Superior Court (2023) 15 Cal.5th The order granting the reconsideration petition was made more than 60 days after the petition’s filing, and the then-governing statute provided a petition “is deemed to have been denied. 2023) 97 Cal.App.5th 2024) 99 Cal.App.5th Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd.

Prima Facie Case 45

Prima Facie Case Court Construction Finance 45

Conflict of Laws

JANUARY 15, 2023

The Federal Court Legislation Amendment Rules 2022 (Cth) (‘Amendment Rules’) came into force on 13 January 2023. Leave to serve turned on three conditions: the court had subject matter jurisdiction, the claim was of a kind mentioned in the rules, and the party had a prima facie case for any or all of the relief claimed: FCR r 10.43(4).

Court 40

Court Prima Facie Case Statute Cause of Action 40

Conflict of Laws

JUNE 11, 2023

In Yin v Wu [2023] VSCA 130 , the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria set aside a judgment [1] which had affirmed the enforcement a Chinese judgment by an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court. [2] Yin’s evidence raised a prima facie case that he had been denied natural justice in the Chinese proceedings: [91].

Prima Facie Case 40

Prima Facie Case Court Litigation Litigating 40

Above The Law

JANUARY 24, 2025

Decision The court concluded that Lewis failed to make a prima facie case for discrimination because her comparators were not “similarly situated in all material respects.” Judge Stark / Federal Circuit / April 12, 2023 Case Overview This case involves Sanderling Management Ltd. suing Snap Inc.

Contract 52

Contract Court Prima Facie Case Laws 52