This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The dispute is whether a superior court can consider grand jury testimony in deciding if a defendant meets the criteria for resentencing under SB 1437 and subsequent amending legislation, which narrowed liability under the felony murder and the natural and probable consequences doctrines. Ocobachi (2024) 105 Cal.App.5th 2d 218; Pen.
The dispute is whether a superior court can consider grand jury testimony in deciding if a defendant meets the criteria for resentencing under SB 1437 and subsequent amending legislation, which narrowed liability under the felony murder and the natural and probable consequences doctrines. Ocobachi (2024) 105 Cal.App.5th
Racial Justice Act grant-and-transfer The court granted a district attorney’s petition for review in People v. Quintero (2024) 107 Cal.App.5th There hasn’t been a straight grant since February 26. There also weren’t many highlights, but here are some. Section 1170.1(c) and 1170.1, in denying compassionate release.
The defendant was sentenced over 40 years ago to life without parole for felony murder after a jury’s true finding of felony-murder special circumstances. The 2018 legislation narrowed felony murder liability and allows for resentencing. FCA US, LLC (2024) 17 Cal.5th Williams (2024) 17 Cal.5th
It was the plaintiff-employee who demanded arbitration and, when the defendant-employer who had drafted the arbitration agreement didn’t timely pay the arbitration fees, withdrew from the arbitration and was awarded attorney fees and costs of over $175,000. 2024) 16 Cal.5th 2024) 16 Cal.5th Walker (2024) 16 Cal.5th
Emanuel , another case concerning a resentencing petition under Senate Bill 1437 , legislation that limited criminal liability for felony murder and eliminated it for murder under the natural-and-probable-consequences doctrine. 1307 (2023-2024 Reg. Murder resentencing. The court will also hear People v. In Make UC a Good Neighbor v.
The companion bill was introduced to the Tennessee House of Representatives on January 29, 2024 as HB 2310 by Representative Bryan Richey and to the Tennessee Senate on January 31. Senator Janice Bowling introduced SB 2782 in the Senate.
The lawsuit names Idaho Attorney General Raúl Labrador, the prosecuting attorney for a county in Idaho and members of the Idaho Code Commission as defendants. The law will go into effect on January 1, 2024. Idaho Governor Brad Little signed House Bill 71 into law in April.
The indictment alleged that Anastasiou sent threats to Supreme Court justices from January 4, 2024, to July 11, 2024, by internet messages through the court’s publicly accessible website. The indictment alleged felonies of nine counts of threats against a federal judge and 13 counts of threats in interstate commerce altogether.
But there were notable actions, including: Felony murder resentencing. Superior Court , a writ petition that attempted to knock off this November’s ballot the initiative titled “Protect Patients Now Act of 2024.” Burgos (2024) 16 Cal.5th Hardin (2024) 15 Cal.5th Relatively, that’s a small number.
The Supreme Court hasn’t been holding many oral arguments this term: only 23 cases have been heard or scheduled through the court’s recently announced March calendar , which will be its seventh of 2024–2025. The last update was in June 2024. Association of Deputy District Attorneys for Los Angeles County v.
Resentencing was sought under Senate Bill 1437 , 2018 legislation that limited criminal liability for felony murder, eliminated it for murder under the natural-and-probable-consequences doctrine, and allowed possible resentencing for those convicted under pre-SB 1437 law. Hardin (2024) 15 Cal.5th Court attorney pension denial.
The court sent an oral argument letter in December of last year, but the case might not be calendared until this coming November at the earliest because the court has found good cause for one attorney’s request not to set the case for argument in September or October. An oral argument letter was sent in March 2024. 1950 (Stats.
Nine arguments makes early-May the largest calendar of the 2023-2024 term thus far and goes a long way towards fulfilling Chief Justice Patricia Guerrero’s pledge to increase the court’s opinion output during the term’s second half. (May is the only month with two argument calendars.) More about the cases here. Turrieta v.
His sentencing hearing will be on August 12, 2024. Attorney Carla Freedman for the Northern District of New York stated, “ The federal felony conviction [Dai] sustains today underscores that those who break the law by making violent threats will be found and prosecuted, even if they attempt to hide by posting anonymously.”
Watts had initially been charged with felony abuse of a corpse in October after Warren County police found the remains of her pregnancy in her toilet and trash. More decisions on access to reproductive care are to come in 2024. The grand jury responded by returning a no bill—effectively dismissing the case.
And the court denied review to a group of 13 much-relisted cases that raised the question whether felony defendants have a constitutional right to a 12-person jury rather than just a six-person one. relisted after the May 23, 2024 conference) Delligatti v. relisted after the May 23, 2024 conference) Granier v. Kentucky ex rel.
A feud between two of Texas’ most prominent justice reformers—Harris County District Attorney Kim Ogg and Judge Lina Hidalgo—has exploded into a bitter court case. A Democrat, she is up for reelection in 2024. They called for an “unbiased attorney” to be appointed to take her place. Harris County DA Kim Ogg.
Former Republican State Representative Daire Rendon and former Trump-backed attorney general candidate Matthew DePerno were charged Tuesday over efforts to access and tamper with voting machines in Michigan following the 2020 US presidential election. The 2024 presidential election will soon be upon us.
I was highly skeptical of the charges brought by Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner, who was later removed from the case due to ethical concerns. banc 2016), Hill pleaded guilty to and was convicted of felony forgery. Louis appeared outside of their home in an armed standoff with protesters in St.Louis. In Bill v. Boyer (Mo.
A Manhattan jury has found former US President Donald Trump guilty on all 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in the first degree in his New York hush money criminal trial. Donald Trump is the first former US president to be convicted of a felony. His conviction will not disqualify him from running in the 2024 election.
The Center for Reproductive Rights, a reproductive rights organization, filed a lawsuit challenging the state’s ban, which currently makes it a felony to perform or aid an abortion, with an exception for situations where women face death or a serious health risk. ” A jury trial is currently set for August 2024.
Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill supported the indictment, stating : “It is illegal to send abortion pills into this State and it’s illegal to coerce another into having an abortion. .” After the daughter ingested the pill, she was taken to the hospital because of a medical emergency.
The case was the only addition to the justices’ docket for their 2024-25 term. And over a dissent by Justice Neil Gorsuch, the justices declined to decide whether the Constitution guarantees the right to a trial by a 12-person jury when the defendant is charged with a felony. But the justices declined to do so.
attorney for the District of Delaware. At the same time, Attorney General Merrick Garland has steadfastly ignored the obvious basis for the appointment of a special counsel despite repeated references to the President as an intended recipient of influence peddling proceeds. Take t he investigation of David Weiss, the U.S.
There is no question that the best course in dealing with a felonious president is to first remove the president from office through the impeachment process and then indict the former president in the wake of the Senate conviction. He could wait to see if Biden does not run for reelection or loses in 2024.
That alone will be an historic moment for Congress to declare that the son of a sitting president may have committed a federal felony. Jonathan Turley, an attorney, constitutional law scholar and legal analyst, is the Shapiro Chair for Public Interest Law at The George Washington University Law School.
The list of civil cases includes the ongoing investigation by New York Attorney General Letitia James into whether he falsely inflated the value of his assets in annual financial statements. Accordingly, they argued that Eastman could not withhold from Congress the subpoenaed evidence on the grounds of attorney-client privilege.
New leaks from the Justice Department investigation have indicated that prosecutors are considering four charges : two misdemeanor counts for failure to file taxes, a single felony count of tax evasion related to a business expense for one year of taxes and a potential felony count on falsifying a form linked to a gun permit.
Some Republican presidential candidates have stated already that they will (or would consider) pardons for Trump if they are elected in 2024. Trump also knows that while he cannot afford to lose one felony count, Smith cannot afford to lose one juror.
That is not even including potential felony charges for the original gun violation , money laundering, or other crimes. Jonathan Turley, an attorney, constitutional law scholar and legal analyst, is the Shapiro Chair for Public Interest Law at The George Washington University Law School.
Four Washington Post journalists analyzed Donald Trump’s polling numbers for the 2024 presidential election among all voters as well as personal interviews with Republicans from multiple states.
Yet at the press conference and Q & A following the arraignment District Attorney Alvin Bragg told the world that the 34 felony charges brought against defendant Trump were nothing more than the Manhattan office engaging in its everyday prosecution of “bread and butter” white-collar crimes.
District Attorney Fani Willis had described Wade as “ a Southern gentleman. In New York, the legislature changed the statute of limitations to allow Trump to be sued while New York Attorney General Letitia James effectively ran on a pledge of selectively prosecuting him. Fulton County, Ga. Me, not so much.”
Even though the 2024 summer movie season kicked off with a disappointing debut , podcast listening is expected to be at an all time high. Avid listeners will be excited to know that Attorney and Author J.
In November 2022, US Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed Jack Smith to serve as special counsel with oversight of two investigations related to Trump. Smith argued he qualified as an “inferior” officer, thus validating his appointment by the US Attorney General. After careful study of this seminal issue, the answer is no.
I previously testified in Congress on the seizure of some boxes of material at Mar-a-Lago and the authority of the National Archives to seek intervention by the attorney general to force compliance with the PRA. The PRA is rarely subject to criminal prosecution, and past prosecutions have resulted in remarkably light punishments.
After an absurd $450 million decision courtesy of Attorney General Letitia James, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg will bring his equally controversial criminal prosecution over hush money paid to former porn star Stormy Daniels before the 2016 election. However, this is a Pyrrhic victory for the New York legal system.
Plaintiffs, including 22 state attorneys general and medical associations, argued that the cap violated federal law and threatened to disrupt biomedical research and public health initiatives. Austin , 2025) later overruled its earlier decision in Jean (2024) and aligned with Thacker. For example: Fifth Circuit: In McRorey v.
New York Attorney General Letitia James (D) ran on a pledge to bag former president Donald Trump. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg also pledged to get Trump. Through various contortions, Bragg converted a dead misdemeanor case into 34 felonies in an unprecedented prosecution. Jonathan Turley is the J.B. and Maurice C.
Once considered the premier legal system in the country, figures like New York Attorney General Letitia James , Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, Justices Arthur F.Engoron and Juan Merchan have caused the system to be weaponized for political purposes. million New York votes, or 42.7%, in the 2024 election.
In April, Trump pleaded not guilty to 34 felony counts brought by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg related to hush money payments made to porn star Stormy Daniels prior to the 2016 election. Nevertheless, Comey chose this month to declare that, in the 2024 election, “it has to be Joe Biden.”
Below is an expanded version of my column in the New York Post on the start of the Trump trial and much awaited explanation of District Attorney Alvin Bragg on the underlying alleged criminal conduct. We have never seen a case like this one where a dead misdemeanor from 2016 could be revived as a felony just before any election in 2024.
Yet in the second GOP debate on Wednesday night that underscored Donald Trump’s dominance and the irrelevancy of the rest of the so-called Republican field of candidates, there was no mention whatsoever of the threat to American democracy that will be the defining issue of the 2024 presidential election.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content