Remove 2025 Remove Contract Remove Court Rules
article thumbnail

No tort liability in family business conflict.

Day on Torts

In a case about the demise of a family business, the Court of Appeals reversed trial court rulings for the plaintiff on tort claims of intentional interference with business relationships and conversion. The trial court credited the plaintiffs testimony that the brothers had an oral agreement. In Grubb v. Grubb , No.

Tort 52
article thumbnail

A New Precedent in Contract Conflicts: Decoding the Tyson v. GIC Ruling on Hierarchy Clauses

Conflict of Laws

The transaction involved two agreements; a Market Reforms Contract ( MRC ) and second Facultative Certificates ( Certificates ). The MRC contained an explicit choice of law and an exclusive jurisdiction clause, submitting disputes to English courts to be governed by the laws of England and Wales ( English DRC ).

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Chinese Judicial Practice on Asymmetric Choice of Court Agreements in International Civil & Commercial Disputes

Conflict of Laws

Chen Fanglin , Fujian High Peoples court held that such a clause does not violate CPL and recognized its validity. [14] Chen Jianbao , Beijing Fourth Intermediate Peoples Court pointed out that CPL allows parties to a contract the right to select the court by agreement, which reflects party autonomy in civil procedure law.

Court 45
article thumbnail

Many rulings, but no straight grants at this week’s conference

At the Lectern

The Supreme Court ruled on 145 matters at yesterday’s conference , but none of those rulings was a straight grant. 5th 981: the court sent one case back for reconsideration in light of the Lynch , Salazar , and Reyes opinions. Lopez (2025) 17 Cal.5th Here are some highlights. Forest River, Inc.

Court 45
article thumbnail

Washington State Supreme Court rules immigration detainees entitled to minimum wage

JURIST

The Washington Supreme Court ruled Thursday that civil immigration detainees employed in private facilities must be treated as legal employees and are thus entitled to the minimum wage stipulated by the state. The case, Ugochukwu Goodluck Nwauzor, et al v. The GEO Group, Inc.

article thumbnail

Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax) 5/2024: Abstracts

Conflict of Laws

Klink: Der Commercial Court nach dem Justizstandort-Stärkungsgesetz – ein Modellprojekt für grenzüberschreitende Gerichtsverfahren The Legal Venue Strengthening Act allows the German states to establish Commercial Courts at the higher regional courts as of 2025.

Divorce 59
article thumbnail

Washington federal court rules against for-profit immigration detention center for minimum wage violations

JURIST

As such, the center will be shut down before 2025, when GEO’s contract with ICE expires. The post Washington federal court rules against for-profit immigration detention center for minimum wage violations appeared first on JURIST - News - Legal News & Commentary.