Remove 2025 Remove Diligence Remove Law School
article thumbnail

Global Value Chains and Transnational Private Law Workshop at Edinburgh Law School – Report

Conflict of Laws

Candidate in Law, Peking University Law School) The ‘Global Value Chains and Transnational Private Law’ workshop was successfully held at Edinburgh Law School in a hybrid format from June 23 to 25, 2024. This project is funded by the Law Schools Global League (LSGL) , convened by Prof.

article thumbnail

Time’s Up: Will Law Firms Say Goodbye To Billable Hour In The (Gen)AI Era?

Above The Law

In our forthcoming Spring 2025 publication, Fighting the Hypothetical: Why Law Firms Should Rethink the Billable Hour in the Generative AI Era, [1] we hypothesize that Generative AI (GenAI) technology will change forever how legal services are delivered and will force law firms to re-engineer their legacy economic model.

Law Firm 107
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Guest Commentary: Lessons from the Belgium Climate Case: the devil is in the details

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

To redress this violation, Klimaatzaak asked the Tribunal to set specific—and legally binding—emission reduction targets of 48% in 2025 and 65% in 2030 compared to 1990 levels, achieving net zero emissions by 2050. Matthias Petel is an SJD Candidate at Harvard Law School and Antoine De Spiegeleir is an LLM Candidate at Yale Law School.

article thumbnail

Is There Really a Fiduciary Duty to Destroy the Climate?

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

At a recent Columbia Law School colloquium, jointly sponsored by the Sabin Center and the Millstein Center, participants posed a foundational question: How do corporate law standards of fiduciary duty relate to what scientists call the climate emergency? [1] 2025, at 12 (forthcoming in Stanford Law Review ).

Statute 59
article thumbnail

April 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The Klimaatzaak—“climate case”—was brought by an organization of concerned citizens arguing that Belgian law requires the Belgian government’s approach to reducing greenhouse gas emissions to be more aggressive. From February 2019 through March 2020, the parties submitted their main conclusions and final conclusions. VZW Klimaatzaak v.

Court 122