This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
What follows are Matthews answers to my remaining two questions as Newman Infinite prepares its appeal to the Peoples Supreme Court of China before April 30, 2025, seeking to overturn the remaining points of contention with respect to the lower courts infringement findings.
2, 2025) that affirms FDAs denial of authorization to market flavored vape products. To the manufacturers chagrin, FDA squarely rejected approximately 1.2 Frustrating as that may be for the manufacturers, FDAs denial orders did not constitute a change in existing policy. Wages & White Lion Investments, LLC , No.
23-1141 took place in March 2025 before the US Supreme Court. As previously indicated, this is a much-politicized case brought by Mexico against US gun manufacturers. The hearing before the US Supreme Court took place on 4 March 2025. Estados Unidos Mexicanos (Mexico) No. We have previously reported on this case here and here.
14, 2025) (Lourie, J.). This latest ruling stands in contrast to the court's January 2025 decisions upholding preliminary injunctions against Samsung Bioepis and Formycon, effectively blocking their biosimilar launches. All three cases are part of consolidated multi-district litigation in the Northern District of West Virginia.
On March 18, 2025, Judge Ronnie Abrams dismissed the lawsuit with prejudice , penning an opinion that upholds Local Law 154 as a valid exercise of local authority beyond the purview of EPCAs preemption clause. In other words, EPCAs text and structure clearly intended to avoid a patchwork of conflicting and unpredictable regulations.
ur Tatlici, however, denies any involvement in the publications and maintains that the defamatory material was fabricated by Applicant Mehmet Tatlici and his Florida lawyers to manufacture a basis for litigation. [10] The Maltese Courts Decision In its judgment dated 13 February 2025 (Application No. 2025/720 Sor. [8]
1) publish a list of selected drugs in accordance with section 1192; (2) enter into agreements with manufacturers of selected drugs with respect to such period, in accordance with section 1193; (3) negotiate and, if applicable, renegotiate maximum fair prices for such selected drugs, in accordance with section 1194; and. (4)
As support for its claim that “3 trees [are] planted for every tree used,” Georgia-Pacific demonstrated that it “accurately tracks the number of trees consumed throughout its manufacturing process and that it can ensure that three trees are regrown for each tree used.”
As background, FDA approved Catalyst’s NDA for Firdapse (amifampridine) for the treatment of adult Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS) and, because the product had been designated an orphan drug, awarded Firdapse the statutory 7 years of orphan drug exclusivity expiring in November 2025. 6 to less than 17 years of age).
Dodge (George Washington University Law School) and first published on Transnational Litigation Blog. The original version can be found at Transnational Litigation Blog. On March 7, 2025, Judge Stephen N. factories [in China] and the direct hoarding of PPE manufactured or for sale in the United States. Limbaugh, Jr.
J.Crew has a $400 million exit term loan from Anchorage, GSO Capital Partners LP and others due 2027, and a $400 million asset-based lending credit facility due 2025 from Bank of America NA. The company said its stores and manufacturing operations would continue to operate normally under a restructuring deal reached with most secured lenders.
Mller-Berg: The effects of the new product liability directive on international product liability The Swiss Federal Court had to decide on the international jurisdiction for a negative declaratory action in a product liability dispute in the case of cross-border manufacturing involving a division of labour. 3 Lugano Convention.
In contrast, the 2022 proposed redefinition focused on food groups recommended by nutrition science and the Dietary Guidelines (DGs), 2020-2025. Therefore, manufacturers must maintain records for foods bearing a healthy claim unless it is clear from the foods mandatory labeling information. The compliance date is February 25, 2028.
The reconciliation process for the fiscal year 2025 federal budget is underway and, unsurprisingly, various provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA) are at risk. Terminations under both IRA programs have been challenged in court (see here and here for more information on the litigation).
On February 19, 2025, Judge Sean Jordan in the Eastern District of Texas heard oral arguments in American Clinical Laboratory Association (ACLA) and the Association for Molecular Pathologys (AMP) [1] lawsuit against the Department of Health and Human Services. 1] Hyman, Phelps & McNamara represents AMP in this litigation.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. CLIMATE LITIGATION CHART. and non-U.S. If you know of any cases we have missed, please email us at columbiaclimate@gmail.com.
In 2022, Texas, along with several other states and industry groups representing fuel manufacturers (together, Petitioners), challenged EPA’s new emissions standards in court. These standards required each automobile manufacturer to reduce the average emissions from its vehicle fleet by approximately 5% per year between 2012 and 2025.
The two graphs below track the Justices word counts across all argument in the 2023/2024 Term and those already completed in this 2024/2025 Term. The remainder of this piece proceeds by breaking down and comparing their argument styles across eight oral arguments, four from the 2023/2024 Term and four from the 2024/2025 Term.
If genuine, the merchandisewould have an estimated total Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) value of approximately $29,989. Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) Reminder: changes to the three tiers of DDTC registration fees went into effect on January 9, 2025. sanctions against Russian national Viktor Perevalov.
Of course, some in the Trump administration — including, at times, Trump himself — insist that these tariffs are more or less permanent, meant to create manufacturing jobs in the United States and reorder the world economy. The tariffs will thus not resurrect manufacturing in the United States. Those folks are lying to you.
climate litigation database , and looks ahead at what we may see next. With some exceptions, federal agencies formerly defending Biden administration climate actions requested that the cases be held in abeyance to allow new political leadership time to be briefed on the litigation and to determine how to proceed.
It is likely that President Trump and the incoming Congress will seek to make similar use of the CRA in 2025. This question will likely continue to be litigated. Here, too, the CRA was used in the environmental context to invalidate Trump-era deregulatory actions. 3d 879, 883 (D. Idaho 2019).
By 2024-2025, however, Barretts opinions began showing a shift toward supporting greater agency deference. Oklahoma (2025) reflect a consistent adherence to traditionally conservative judicial principles, particularly in her emphasis on federalism, judicial restraint, and deference to state authority in death penalty cases.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. HERE ARE RECENT ADDITIONS TO THE INTERNATIONAL CLIMATE LITIGATION CHART. By Margaret Barry and Korey Silverman-Koati.
These appointments are already influencing rulings on key areas, including administrative law, corporate litigation, and constitutional law. Furthermore, recent Supreme Court decisions curbing the power of regulatory agencies set the stage for an additional litigation surge. The Judges response? Elizabeth G.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content