Remove 2026 Remove Court Rules Remove Legal
article thumbnail

The Alert: April – June 2024

Parasec

We have a team with over 63 years of combined corporate governance experience, and we retain legal counsel that we can engage with quickly if necessary. Federal: Federal Court Rules CTA Unconstitutional On March 1, 2024, a federal court in Alabama ruled in National Small Business United (NSBU) v.

article thumbnail

Nevada voter ID amendment qualifies for November ballot

JURIST

If passed, the amendment would need to be reaffirmed by voters in 2026 to be permanently adopted into the state constitution. The amendment includes provisions that would require voters submitting mail ballots to provide the last four digits of their driver’s license or Social Security number.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Next-Gen Bar Exam That Truly Tests Daily Practice Skills Must Include Technology

LawTechnologyToday

In today’s legal profession, lawyers must be technologically competent. This is reinforced by ABA Model Rule of Professional Conduct 1.1 Currently, most states have created the duty of technology competency by adopting some form of Model Rule 1.1 and Comment 8. and/or Comment 8.

article thumbnail

Africa’s Advisory Opinion Request: Taking Climate Justice to the Continent’s Highest Court

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The request for an Advisory Opinion addresses critical legal obligations relating to the human rights obligations of African States to protect the rights of citizens in the context of the climate crisis. The questions raised in the advisory opinion request are expansive in scope and legal significance.

Court 64
article thumbnail

March 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

On March 1, the federal defendants filed their opposition to the motion to stay the mandate, arguing that the Supreme Court was unlikely to grant the petition, “much less reverse this Court’s judgment,” because the Ninth Circuit had applied settled precedent. Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Azar , No. 3:20-cv-03703 (N.D.

Court 64