Remove 2027 Remove Manufacturing Remove Statute
article thumbnail

This Week in Regulation for Broadcasters: January 23, 2023 to January 30, 2023

Broadcast Law Blog

While the FCC also found Fox responsible for transmitting the segment to its affiliates nationwide in violation of the rule, the FCC did not fine Fox as a programming network because the one-year statute of limitations period applicable to non-broadcasters had expired.

Sports 98
article thumbnail

Proposed LDT Rule Raises Many Questions but Provides Few Answers

FDA Law Blog

The crux of the proposed rule lies in the addition of ten words: “ including when the manufacturer of these products is a laboratory.” These words would be added to the definition of “ in vitro diagnostic [IVD] products” in 21 C.F.R. But, by statute all devices not previously classified are automatically placed into Class III.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

AstraZeneca’s Challenge to Price Negotiation Fails in Federal District Court

FDA Law Blog

First, AstraZeneca alleged that CMS improperly defined a “qualifying single source drug” to include all dosage forms and strengths of the drug marketed by the manufacturer with the same active moiety or ingredient—even if those different forms and strengths were approved under different NDAs. Opinion at 17.

Court 64
article thumbnail

Customs and Trade News Weekly Snapshot

Customs & International Trade Law

If genuine, the merchandisewould have an estimated total Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) value of approximately $29,989. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) The CPSC published a notice announcing that the new eFiling requirements will be effective in stages in 2026 and 2027.

eFiling 52