article thumbnail

Germany top court rules climate change law is insufficient

JURIST

The court agreed with the plaintiffs and stated that the obligations the Federal Climate Change Act creates to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55 percent by 2030 is insufficient. The provisions also neglect to create emissions reduction responsibilities after 2030.

article thumbnail

UK High Court rules that government climate strategy is inadequate and unlawful

JURIST

The UK High Court ruled Friday that the Government’s climate strategy is inadequate and therefore violates the UK Climate Change Act 2008. The ruling comes nearly two years after a previous High Court judgment ordered the Government to strengthen its net zero strategy to bring it in line with the Climate Change Act.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Belgium court rules Belgium’s failure to meet climate obligations amounts to human rights violation

JURIST

Some of the recommendations from Klimaatzaak are to impose concrete reduction targets, such as 50 percent by 2030. The post Belgium court rules Belgium’s failure to meet climate obligations amounts to human rights violation appeared first on JURIST - News - Legal News & Commentary.

article thumbnail

German court rules government violated climate change policy

JURIST

Environmental NGOs Deutsche Umwelthilfe and BUND brought the claim to court. Their claim rested on Section 8 of the Climate Protection Act, which aims to reduce 65% of greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 compared to 1990 levels. The post German court rules government violated climate change policy appeared first on JURIST - News.

article thumbnail

The Czech Climate Case: Uncertainty after the Case’s Dismissal

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

On November 26, 2024, the Supreme Administrative Court of the Czech Republic dismissed the countrys first strategic climate case ( Klimatick aloba R v. Czech Republic ), finding that the European Union (EU)s commitment to reduce emissions by 55 percent by 2030 is a collective obligation, not an individual one for Czechia.

article thumbnail

Climate activists challenge Norway’s Arctic oil plans in Europe rights court

JURIST

In 2018, the Oslo District Court held that Article 112 only applies to local environmental harm and greenhouse gas emissions in Norway, but not to emissions from combustion that occurs abroad. In May, a Hague court ordered Royal Dutch Shell to cut its carbon emissions 45 percent by 2030. The case was then dismissed on appeal.

Court 197
article thumbnail

Understanding Unsuccessful Climate Litigation: The Spanish Greenpeace Case

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Under Annex 1 of the EU Regulation, by 2030, Spain must have reduced its GHG emissions by 37.7% The PNIEC and the Law on Climate Change include a target of GHG emission reduction of 23% by 2030 compared to 1990. The plaintiffs argued that reducing GHG emissions by 23% compared to 1990 levels by 2030 was insufficient to meet the 1.5º