JURIST

MARCH 10, 2021

The Attorneys General of Arizona and Montana filed an amended a joint lawsuit Monday alleging that the Biden administration has violated immigration and administrative law. As pointed out in the joint Arizona and Montana complaint, this will result in the release of some detainees due to capacity limits.

Immigration 178

Immigration Attorney Administrative Law Laws 178

Broadcast Law Blog

MARCH 12, 2023

For a further discussion of Sohn’s withdrawal and its implications for broadcast regulation, see the article on our Broadcast Law Blog, here. Channel 280A at Peach Springs became vacant due to the Bureau’s cancellation of the license of the station that previously occupied that channel.

Construction 82

Construction Administrative Law Legal Legal 82

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 7, 2022

After Texas and Missouri challenged that decision, a federal district court vacated the secretary’s termination, in part on the administrative-law ground that the decision was insufficiently explained. Arizona — confirming that the rule announced in Simmons v. Issue : Whether the Supreme Court’s decision in Lynch v.

Laws 143

Laws Immigration Court Legal 143

SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 7, 2022

Those states, led by Arizona, appealed to the Supreme Court. The justices granted the states’ petition in Arizona v. In his concurrence in Arizona , the chief justice noted his worry “whether the Government’s actions, all told, comport with the principles of administrative law.”

Immigration 82

Immigration Litigation Litigating Administrative Law 82

Above The Law

MARCH 21, 2025

Area of Law: Constitutional Law, Civil Rights, Federal Authority: 25 points. Administrative Law, Criminal Law: 20 points. 2 Plaintiffs triumphed as the court struck down Arizonas restrictive voter registration laws, with Jonathan L. Concurring Opinion: +15 points per opinion. Other Areas: 15 points.

Court 72

Court Contract Government Education 72

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 28, 2022

If this lawsuit is allowed to go forward, the administration warns, it will mean that any state could “sue the federal government about virtually any policy.”. Eighteen states with Republican attorneys general, led by Arizona, filed a “friend of the court” brief supporting Texas and Louisiana.

Immigration 105

Immigration Government Healthcare Court 105

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 15, 2022

Share The Supreme Court on Wednesday threw out an effort by Arizona and 12 other states with Republican attorneys general to defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule after the Biden administration refused to do so. The case, Arizona v.

Immigration 102

Immigration Government Administrative Law Court 102

SCOTUSBlog

JULY 21, 2022

Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit rejected the Biden administration’s request to put Tipton’s ruling on hold while it appeals. In a separate case, Arizona, Montana, and Ohio also challenged the policy in a federal district court in Ohio. The district court barred the Biden administration from relying on the memorandum, but the U.S.

Immigration 145

Immigration Court Government Court Rules 145

SCOTUSBlog

DECEMBER 31, 2020

On March 2, the justices will hear oral argument in a major voting-rights dispute from Arizona. Democratic National Committee and Arizona Republican Party v. In the two cases, Brnovich v. Saul & Davis v. Saul (Mar. Disclosure : Goldstein & Russell, P.C.,

Calendaring 139

Calendaring Immigration Misdemeanor Construction 139

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 23, 2022

Share The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Wednesday in a case involving whether a group of states can defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule after the Biden administration refused to do so. After nearly 90 minutes of debate in Arizona v.

Immigration 102

Immigration Court Administrative Law Government 102