Administrative Law Arizona Attorney 
SCOTUSBlog
OCTOBER 10, 2024
But the 5th Circuit wrote that this case “may … attract the [Supreme] Court’s interest” because “[i]t tees up one of the fiercest (and oldest) fights in administrative law: the Humphrey’s Executor ‘exception to the general ‘rule’ that lets a president remove subordinates at will.” Davis seeks review of that ruling. 30 conference.)
JURIST
MARCH 10, 2021
The Attorneys General of Arizona and Montana filed an amended a joint lawsuit Monday alleging that the Biden administration has violated immigration and administrative law. The Attorney General of Florida filed a similar lawsuit on Tuesday.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
SCOTUSBlog
JANUARY 7, 2022
After Texas and Missouri challenged that decision, a federal district court vacated the secretary’s termination, in part on the administrative-law ground that the decision was insufficiently explained. whose attorneys contribute to SCOTUSblog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioners in this case.
SCOTUSBlog
NOVEMBER 28, 2022
If this lawsuit is allowed to go forward, the administration warns, it will mean that any state could “sue the federal government about virtually any policy.”. Eighteen states with Republican attorneys general, led by Arizona, filed a “friend of the court” brief supporting Texas and Louisiana.
SCOTUSBlog
JUNE 15, 2022
Share The Supreme Court on Wednesday threw out an effort by Arizona and 12 other states with Republican attorneys general to defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule after the Biden administration refused to do so. The case, Arizona v.
SCOTUSBlog
JULY 21, 2022
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit rejected the Biden administration’s request to put Tipton’s ruling on hold while it appeals. In a separate case, Arizona, Montana, and Ohio also challenged the policy in a federal district court in Ohio. The district court barred the Biden administration from relying on the memorandum, but the U.S.
SCOTUSBlog
DECEMBER 31, 2020
On March 2, the justices will hear oral argument in a major voting-rights dispute from Arizona. Democratic National Committee and Arizona Republican Party v. whose attorneys contribute to SCOTUSblog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the U.S. In the two cases, Brnovich v. Saul (Mar.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
122 
Let's personalize your content