SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 7, 2022

After Texas and Missouri challenged that decision, a federal district court vacated the secretary’s termination, in part on the administrative-law ground that the decision was insufficiently explained. whose attorneys contribute to SCOTUSblog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioners in this case.

Laws 125

Laws Immigration Court Administrative Law 125

JURIST

MARCH 10, 2021

The Attorneys General of Arizona and Montana filed an amended a joint lawsuit Monday alleging that the Biden administration has violated immigration and administrative law. The Attorney General of Florida filed a similar lawsuit on Tuesday.

Immigration 178

Immigration Attorney Administrative Law Laws 178

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 28, 2022

The justices directed the Biden administration and the states to address three specific questions. The first is whether the states have a right to bring their lawsuit at all – a concept known as legal standing. But Texas and Louisiana, U.S.

Immigration 103

Immigration Government Healthcare Court 103

SCOTUSBlog

DECEMBER 31, 2020

On March 2, the justices will hear oral argument in a major voting-rights dispute from Arizona. Democratic National Committee and Arizona Republican Party v. whose attorneys contribute to SCOTUSblog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the U.S. In the two cases, Brnovich v. Saul (Mar.

Calendaring 136

Calendaring Immigration Misdemeanor Construction 136

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 23, 2022

Share The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Wednesday in a case involving whether a group of states can defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule after the Biden administration refused to do so. After nearly 90 minutes of debate in Arizona v.

Immigration 93

Immigration Court Administrative Law Government 93