Remove Administrative Law Remove Arizona Remove Court
article thumbnail

In back-to-back cases, justices will scrutinize traditional limits on challenges to agency proceedings

SCOTUSBlog

Cochran present a frontal assault on the traditional framework under which federal courts have entertained complaints about federal agencies. The first case involves Axon Enterprise, an Arizona company that makes police body cameras and other technology products for law enforcement. SEC that the ALJ’s appointment was unlawful.

Statute 114
article thumbnail

Affirmative action cases up first in November argument calendar

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Supreme Court will kick off its November argument session with the highest-profile cases of that session: challenges to the consideration of race in the admissions process at Harvard and the University of North Carolina. The court moved Mallory v. Arizona (Nov. President and Fellows of Harvard College on Oct.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Fourteen cases to watch from the Supreme Court’s end-of-summer “long conference”

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. Just before the Supreme Court begins its new term on the first Monday in October , the court gathers to consider all the hundreds of cert petitions that have built up over the summer. At issue in Oklahoma v.

Court 119
article thumbnail

Morning Docket: 01.10.24

Above The Law

* Supreme Court rejects Trump's attempt to halt New York state law sentencing on "president-elect immunity." There's no rule requiring justices to note their dissent from this one, but Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh wanted to make the record clear that they would do what Trump asks even if there's zero basis in law.

article thumbnail

Litigation continues over public charge immigration rule

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Petitions of the Week column highlights a selection of cert petitions recently filed in the Supreme Court. Last term, the court dismissed as improvidently granted, or “DIG”ed , a case brought by Republican-controlled states challenging the government’s repeal of a Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule.

article thumbnail

Divided court declines to reinstate Biden’s immigration guidelines, sets case for argument this fall

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Supreme Court will again weigh the executive branch’s authority to set immigration policy as some red states claim that the Biden administration’s enforcement decisions are too lax. The justices will hear the case in late November without waiting for a federal appeals court to weigh in. In a filing by U.S.

article thumbnail

In U.S. v. Texas, broad questions over immigration enforcement and states’ ability to challenge federal policies

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Tuesday in a dispute over the Biden administration’s authority to set immigration policy. Texas and Louisiana are challenging a federal policy that prioritizes certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for arrest and deportation, arguing that it violates federal law.