Remove Administrative Law Remove Arizona Remove Court Rules
article thumbnail

In back-to-back cases, justices will scrutinize traditional limits on challenges to agency proceedings

SCOTUSBlog

In both cases, the targets of agency proceedings want to challenge the legitimacy of those proceedings right away in federal court, rather than having to await the outcomes of long-running administrative processes before getting their day in court. SEC that the ALJ’s appointment was unlawful.

Statute 121
article thumbnail

“Remain in Mexico” and Texas’ anti-abortion law

SCOTUSBlog

After Texas and Missouri challenged that decision, a federal district court vacated the secretary’s termination, in part on the administrative-law ground that the decision was insufficiently explained. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit to send their challenge to Texas’ restrictive anti-abortion law back to U.S.

Laws 138
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Divided court declines to reinstate Biden’s immigration guidelines, sets case for argument this fall

SCOTUSBlog

The justices will hear the case in late November without waiting for a federal appeals court to weigh in. The justices left in place a district-court ruling striking down the policy, which means that the Biden administration cannot implement it while it waits for the Supreme Court to hear argument and issue a decision.

article thumbnail

Justices probe states’ effort to defend Trump immigration rule after Biden stopped defending it in court

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Wednesday in a case involving whether a group of states can defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule after the Biden administration refused to do so. After nearly 90 minutes of debate in Arizona v.