Administrative Law Arizona Laws Statute 
SCOTUSBlog
NOVEMBER 4, 2022
In both cases, the targets of agency proceedings want to challenge the legitimacy of those proceedings right away in federal court, rather than having to await the outcomes of long-running administrative processes before getting their day in court. The general federal jurisdiction statute ( 28 U.S.C.
SCOTUSBlog
OCTOBER 10, 2024
The same law is at the center of Environmental Protection Agency v. The Supreme Court recently invalidated a removal restriction for an agency headed by a single official in Seila Law LLC v. The Bruen test, the state court added, was “fuzzy,” “backward-looking,” and “unravels durable law.” Calumet Shreveport Refining, L.L.C.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
SCOTUSBlog
OCTOBER 7, 2022
Under federal law, immigration officials may not admit someone to the United States if they deem that person likely to become a public charge, or dependent on government benefits. In 2018, the Trump administration issued a rule that expanded the qualifying benefits to include Medicaid, food stamps and housing assistance.
Above The Law
MARCH 21, 2025
In a series of recent decisions, federal courts across the United States have addressed a range of significant legal issues, from civil rights and constitutional law to administrative authority and criminal justice. Fontes , which involved election law and constitutional questions, and Foote v. Other Areas: 15 points.
Above The Law
APRIL 7, 2025
Accusations of her being a DEI judge and a rattled law professor have flooded social media, with figures like Mike Davis and Laura Loomer leading the charge. These cases share common themes, in resolving disputes over regulatory and administrative law, economic regulation, state-federal authority conflicts, and taxation.
SCOTUSBlog
JANUARY 7, 2022
Texas presents the latest stage in the Biden administration’s attempt to unwind the Trump administration’s “remain in Mexico” policy. After Texas and Missouri challenged that decision, a federal district court vacated the secretary’s termination, in part on the administrative-law ground that the decision was insufficiently explained.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
117 
Let's personalize your content