Administrative Law Arizona Litigating 
SCOTUSBlog
NOVEMBER 4, 2022
In both cases, the targets of agency proceedings want to challenge the legitimacy of those proceedings right away in federal court, rather than having to await the outcomes of long-running administrative processes before getting their day in court.
Broadcast Law Blog
APRIL 27, 2023
The FCC Administrative Law Judge, who is overseeing the hearing ordered by the Media Bureau on certain alleged factual issues that the Bureau has identified with the proposed acquisition, recently put the proceeding on hold so that the parties do not need to spend more money litigating if the deal will not happen.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Above The Law
APRIL 7, 2025
These cases share common themes, in resolving disputes over regulatory and administrative law, economic regulation, state-federal authority conflicts, and taxation. Arizona (2023), Barrett expressed deference to state court decisions, stating, Given the respect we owe state courts, that is not a conclusion we should be quick to draw.
SCOTUSBlog
OCTOBER 7, 2022
In a concurring opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts noted that the court’s DIG did not reflect “the appropriate resolution of other litigation, pending or future, related to” the rule. This week, we highlight cert petitions that ask the court to consider, among other things, the ongoing public charge litigation.
Above The Law
MARCH 21, 2025
Area of Law: Constitutional Law, Civil Rights, Federal Authority: 25 points. Administrative Law, Criminal Law: 20 points. 2 Plaintiffs triumphed as the court struck down Arizonas restrictive voter registration laws, with Jonathan L. Concurring Opinion: +15 points per opinion. Other Areas: 15 points.
SCOTUSBlog
JUNE 15, 2022
Share The Supreme Court on Wednesday threw out an effort by Arizona and 12 other states with Republican attorneys general to defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule after the Biden administration refused to do so. The case, Arizona v.
SCOTUSBlog
JULY 21, 2022
The justices left in place a district-court ruling striking down the policy, which means that the Biden administration cannot implement it while it waits for the Supreme Court to hear argument and issue a decision. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit rejected the Biden administration’s request to put Tipton’s ruling on hold while it appeals.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
119 
Let's personalize your content