SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 4, 2022

In both cases, the targets of agency proceedings want to challenge the legitimacy of those proceedings right away in federal court, rather than having to await the outcomes of long-running administrative processes before getting their day in court. The general federal jurisdiction statute ( 28 U.S.C.

Statute 115

Statute Court Entertainment Administrative Law 115

SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 10, 2024

But the 5th Circuit wrote that this case “may … attract the [Supreme] Court’s interest” because “[i]t tees up one of the fiercest (and oldest) fights in administrative law: the Humphrey’s Executor ‘exception to the general ‘rule’ that lets a president remove subordinates at will.” 30 conference.)

Court 121

Court Lawyer Lawyers Real Estate 121

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 7, 2022

After Texas and Missouri challenged that decision, a federal district court vacated the secretary’s termination, in part on the administrative-law ground that the decision was insufficiently explained. Arizona — confirming that the rule announced in Simmons v. Issue : Whether the Supreme Court’s decision in Lynch v.

Laws 128

Laws Immigration Court Legal 128

SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 7, 2022

Those states, led by Arizona, appealed to the Supreme Court. The justices granted the states’ petition in Arizona v. In his concurrence in Arizona , the chief justice noted his worry “whether the Government’s actions, all told, comport with the principles of administrative law.”

Immigration 89

Immigration Litigation Litigating Administrative Law 89