Remove Administrative Law Remove Attorney Remove Court Decisions
article thumbnail

US Supreme Court hears oral arguments over FDA’s refusal to approve flavored e-cigarettes

JURIST

” The FDA appealed a Fifth Circuit court decision , which ruled the agency violated administrative law by misleading the applicant companies about scientific standards and rejecting applications without genuinely considering their efforts to discourage youth smoking.

Court 211
article thumbnail

DOJ Re-Brands Guidance Documents

FDA Law Blog

This policy, announced by then Associate Attorney General Rachel Brand in 2018 was referred to as the Brand Memo. As a matter of administrative law, the Brand Memo made good sense from the perspective of FDA-regulated industry, as we described here. The memorandum cites the 2019 Supreme Court decision, Kisor v.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

High Court's New EPA Ruling And Its Long-Term Implications

Law 360

Supreme Court's decision in West Virginia v.

article thumbnail

The Preserve Access to Affordable Generics and Biosimilars Act: It’s Back! And Bigger and Bolder than Before!

FDA Law Blog

Supreme Courts decision in SEC v. The bill adopts the very Administrative Law Judge process that the U.S. Attorney General (USAG). It also permits the FTC to sue using its own attorneys rather than DOJ attorneys, again in direct conflict with EO 14215. (As 5) CIVIL PENALTY. Jarkesy, 144 S. Second , S.

article thumbnail

Divided By Principle: How Justices Barrett And Jackson Are Shaping The Future Of Constitutional Law

Above The Law

She posed scenarios to clarify which actions could be deemed private, such as collaborating with private attorneys to disseminate false election claims or submitting fraudulent elector slates. Barrett : 1520 words Justice Barrett’s line of questioning delved into distinguishing between official and private actions of a president.

article thumbnail

Circuit Scoop — February 2025

Above The Law

Cases involving high-stakes issues, such as presidential authority, Fourth Amendment protections, or election law, were prioritized due to their broader implications. Additionally, cases that reversed lower court decisions or set new legal precedents were considered more significant. Administrative Law, Criminal Law: 20 points.

Court 74
article thumbnail

Justices decline to reach merits of conservative states’ attempt to revive public charge rule

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Supreme Court on Wednesday threw out an effort by Arizona and 12 other states with Republican attorneys general to defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule after the Biden administration refused to do so.