This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Share The Supreme Court will kick off its November argument session with the highest-profile cases of that session: challenges to the consideration of race in the admissions process at Harvard and the University of North Carolina. The justices also released a revised calendar for the October argument session. The court moved Mallory v.
Cavender The Supreme Court issued 58 opinions in the October 2022 Term. Rulings in several cases will affect the practice of regulatory and administrativelaw either directly or indirectly, as is recounted below.
Supreme Court declined to hold, in FTC v. Such penalty shall accrue to the United States and may be recovered in a civil action brought by the Commission, in its own name by any of its attorneys designated by it for such purpose, in a district court of the United States against any party that violates this section. Actavis, Inc. ,
Share On Tuesday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in HollyFrontier Cheyenne Refining, LLC v. 7545 — those whose “average aggregate daily crude oil throughput is 765,000 barrels or less for a calendar year.”. Instead, the court explained that the “any time” language reconciled a different timing issue: EPA has a Nov.
All deadlines for the submission of comments or actions by Commerce discussed below refer to the number of calendar days from the applicable starting date. Notice is hereby given that USITC has determined not to review the presiding administrativelaw judge’s (“ALJ”) initial determination (“ID”) (Order No.
The Supreme Court on Thursday released the calendar for its February argument session, which begins on Feb. immigration courts. This article was originally published at Howe on the Court. The post February argument calendar includes immigration, voting-rights cases appeared first on SCOTUSblog. Georgia (Feb.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content